{"id":92016,"date":"2017-12-02T09:33:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T09:33:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-06T20:53:51","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T20:53:51","slug":"chipping-away-at-teddy-defense-legacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/chipping-away-at-teddy-defense-legacy\/","title":{"rendered":"Chipping Away at Teddy&#39;s (Defense) Legacy"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Ted Kennedy was laid to rest three days ago, and it looks like a favorite defense pork bill will follow him to the grave. <\/p>\n<p>Barely 48 hours after Kennedy was buried at Arlington National  Cemetery, the Obama Administration renewed threats to veto a defense  spending bill that funds one of the Senator&#8217;s pet projects&#8211;the  so-called &#8220;alternative&#8221; engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.  According to <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.airforcetimes.com\/news\/2009\/08\/ap_gates_083109\/\">Air Force Times<\/a><\/em>, Defense Secretary Robert Gates made the threat Monday, during a visit to the JSF production facility in Fort Worth, Texas. <\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">Defense Secretary Robert Gates, touring  the Lockheed Martin Corp. plant where the first of the $100 million  planes are being assembled, said there is no need for two engine  suppliers.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;We have looked at the business case a  number of times,&#8221; Gates said. &#8220;The general conclusion is that it would  cost several billion dollars in addition,&#8221; and cause headaches for  production down the road.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><br \/>In an era of defense penny-pinching, Gates said, &#8220;We feel strongly there is not a need for the second engine.&#8221; <br \/><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">While we&#8217;ve faulted Mr. Gates  and his boss, President Obama, for many of their defense cuts, this one  makes eminent sense. The alternative powerplant, the General Electric  F136, offers no improvement in performance over the Pratt &amp; Whitney  F135, the standard engine for F-35. Producing another engine would  create more jobs, but it would take DoD years to recoup the additional  investment. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fas.org\/sgp\/crs\/weapons\/RL33390.pdf\">B one etimate<\/a>,  the Pentagon (and taxpayers) wouldn&#8217;t reach the break-even point on the  alternate engine until &#8220;the late 2020s,&#8221; more than a decade into the  JSF&#8217;s operational career. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Moreover, there is an established  precedent for awarding a single-source contract for advanced fighter  engines. Variants of the F\/A-18 Hornet, which form the backbone of the  Navy&#8217;s fighter fleet, are powered by the GE F414, while the Air Force  F-22 utilizes the Pratt &amp; Whitney F119. In fact, the JSF&#8217;s F135 is a  derivative of the F-22 engine, which will reach 100,000 flight hours in  2009.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Critics claim that a second engine  would help mitigate risks associated with a single-source engine. They  note the F135 has failed twice on test stands, and continued reliance on  the Pratt &amp; Whitney engine could mean problems for operational JSF  units. In response, supporters of the F135 claim the manufacturer is  implementing fixes to correct the problems. <\/span><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">They  also observe that less than 20% of military aircraft groundings over  the last 20 years have been the result of engine problems. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Availability is also a key issue for  the GE engine. Various studies say the F136 is at least four years  behind the Pratt &amp; Whitney power plant in terms of development. As  the JSF enters a critical period of testing and low-rate production,  Lockheed-Martin (and its various customers) can hardly afford to wait  for GE to &#8220;perfect&#8221; the F136.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">It will be interesting to see if  Kennedy&#8217;s Congressional allies put up much of a fight for the GE engine.  Interestingly, few have mentioned the only viable argument for  continuing an alternative engine, i.e., thrust requirements for the  Short Take-off\/Vertical Landing (STOVL) versions of the F-35, built for  the Royal Air Force and the U.S. Marine Corps. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Like most fighters, the JSF has picked  up weight through design changes during the development process. These  changes leave the F135 with little room to meet STOVL performance  requirements for RAF and USMC models, particularly if the F-35 continues  to &#8220;grow.&#8221; The newer F136 design provides more thrust for STOVL  profiles, but those consideration may not be a show-stopper. As <em>Aviation Week&#8217;s<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/aw\/blogs\/defense\/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A2afb375f-19ed-417a-8ef1-87663aabe0b5\">Bill Sweetman observed last year<\/a>, most JSF customers don&#8217;t need the STOVL feature; for them, the Pratt &amp; Whitney engine is more than sufficient.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Reading the procurement tea leaves is  sometimes difficult, but we&#8217;d say the F136 program will finally die in  the months ahead. Without Ted Kennedy and his earmarks, it will be  difficult (if not impossible) for GE to preserve the alternate engine. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ted Kennedy was laid to rest three days ago, and it looks like a favorite defense pork bill will follow him to the grave. Barely 48 hours after Kennedy was buried at Arlington National Cemetery, the Obama Administration renewed threats to veto a defense spending bill that funds one of the Senator&#8217;s pet projects&#8211;the so-called [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92016"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92016"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92016\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92016"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92016"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92016"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}