{"id":91981,"date":"2017-12-02T09:50:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T09:50:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-06T20:53:41","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T20:53:41","slug":"budget-cutting-101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/budget-cutting-101\/","title":{"rendered":"Budget-Cutting 101"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>How does the Obama Administration plan to save money?  If you guessed  &#8220;cutting defense,&#8221; give yourself a gold star and move to the head of the  budgetary class.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB124162900144792405.html\">The <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> reports that defense programs <\/a>will  absorb half of the $17 billion in planned cuts, which will be announced  on Thursday.  Some of the reductions have already been announced,  including plans to halt production of the Air Force&#8217;s F-22 stealth  fighter. <\/p>\n<p>The rest of the cuts will come from domestic programs,  although it&#8217;s unclear if the reductions will actually occur.  As one  administration official told the Journal, virtually all programs have a  constituency, meaning that someone will fight the planned reductions. <\/p>\n<p>Not that it really matters.  The reductions are largely symbolic, as the <em>WSJ<\/em> explains: <\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">Compared  with the total $3.6 trillion spending plan for 2010, the proposed trims  amount to one-half of 1%. Half the cuts would come from defense,  especially Pentagon weapons programs already spelled out by Defense  Secretary Robert Gates, such as trimming back the fleet of advanced F-22  fighter planes. The other half would come from programs that have  strong support among progressive activists who cheered Mr. Obama&#8217;s  election. Programs targeted for elimination or consolidation include  education and housing programs that Democratic aides said will have  fierce advocates among traditionally Democratic constituencies.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Given  that reality, it&#8217;s not inconceivable that some of the domestic  initiatives will be saved, forcing bean counters to look for more cuts  in the defense budget.  So the &#8220;50% share&#8221; for the Pentagon may well  rise, as the administration looks for more ways to save money. <\/p>\n<p>OMB  Director Peter Orszag says the planned defense reductions include &#8220;all  of those&#8221; outlined by Defense Secretary Bob Gates last month.  Programs  targeted for down-sizing (or elimination) include the C-17 transport,  the airborne laser and the aforementioned F-22.  Some analysts believe  that the Air Force has been unfairly singled out for budget cuts, with  ominous implications for the service and its airpower mission. <\/p>\n<p>But  those sorts of arguments don&#8217;t get much traction.  Just today, pollster  Frank Luntz advised Republicans to avoid &#8220;principled arguments&#8221; in  battling the White House on health care reform.  Embrace the reform  mantra, Luntz argued, and advocate efficiency and savings in the GOP  plan. <\/p>\n<p>If you can&#8217;t get American voters to see the folly of  socialized health care, then well-reasoned arguments supporting key  defense programs stand absolutely no chance.  Welcome to the  ill-informed, indifferent U.S. electorate of the early 21st Century.   The greatest of the &#8220;Great Unwashed.&#8221;  Just the kind of voters that  Democrats love.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How does the Obama Administration plan to save money? If you guessed &#8220;cutting defense,&#8221; give yourself a gold star and move to the head of the budgetary class. The Wall Street Journal reports that defense programs will absorb half of the $17 billion in planned cuts, which will be announced on Thursday. Some of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91981"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}