{"id":91895,"date":"2017-12-02T10:41:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T10:41:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-06T20:53:07","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T20:53:07","slug":"under-umbrella","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/under-umbrella\/","title":{"rendered":"Under the Umbrella"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/hasen\/spages\/1045687.html\">Haaretz reports that President-elect Barack Obama will offer Israel additional protection against an Iranian nuclear attack<\/a>,  A source close to the incoming administration says Mr. Obama will  propose placing Israel under our nuclear umbrella, meaning that any  Iranian nuclear strike would bring a &#8220;devastating response&#8221; from the  United States.<\/p>\n<p>The Obama team is not the first to suggest such a policy. Earlier this year, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2008\/04\/10\/AR2008041003271.html\">columnist Charles Krauthammer urged the Bush Administration to issue a &#8220;Holocaust Declaration,<\/a>&#8221; fashioned after President Kennedy&#8217;s famous words during the Cuban Missile Crisis:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;It  shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear attack upon  Israel by Iran, or originating in Iran, as an attack by Iran on the  United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon Iran.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The statement, he continued, should be accompanied by a simple explanation:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;As  a beacon of tolerance and as a leader of the free world, the United  States will not permit a second Holocaust to be perpetuated upon the  Jewish people.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Former Democratic Presidential candidate  (and Secretary of State designee) Hillary Clinton offered a similar  proposal during this year&#8217;s campaign. During a debate with Mr. Obama in  April, Mrs. Clinton suggested that the American nuclear umbrella be  extended to Israel and friendly Arab states in the Middle East, as a  hedge against Iran.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Krauthammer, Senator Clinton and Mr.  Obama&#8217;s national security advisers believe that such a declaration  offers the best hope for deterring Iran. And, at first blush, it&#8217;s hard  to disagree. Negotiations efforts aimed at curtailing Tehran&#8217;s nuclear  ambitions have been a dismal failure. The same holds true for economic  and political sanctions.<\/p>\n<p>In terms of U.S. military options, those  were essentially derailed by last year&#8217;s National Intelligence Estimate  (NIE) which declared that Iran suspended its nuclear weaponization  program, while accelerating other efforts that will eventually lead to a  bomb. It was an amazing bit of analytical gymnastics that proved&#8211;once  again&#8211;that key elements of our intelligence community view the current  administration as more of a threat than Tehran.<\/p>\n<p>But would such a guarantee actually deter Iran? Scott Johnson at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.powerlineblog.com\/\">Powerline <\/a>reminds us of a particularly astute observation by Middle East scholar Bernard Lewis, who observed:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;Iran&#8217;s  leadership comprises a group of extreme fanatical Muslims who believe  that their messianic times have arrived.&#8221; {For the Iranian regime]  &#8220;mutually assured destruction is not a deterrent factor, but rather an  inducement&#8221; because the regime&#8217;s authorities believes it &#8220;can hasten the  final messianic process. This is an extremely dangerous situation of  which it is important to be aware.&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s also worth noting that <a href=\"http:\/\/formerspook.blogspot.com\/2008\/04\/holocaust-declaration.html\">placing Israel under our nuclear umbrella carries other risks, as we outlined in this April post<\/a>.  For starters, it could limit Israel&#8217;s ability to defend itself. With  the largest nuclear arsenal in the Middle East&#8211;and multiple delivery  platforms&#8211;the Jewish State is more than capable of meeting the Iranian  threat:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">For argument&#8217;s sake, let&#8217;s  say an Iranian attack achieves operational surprise, and the initial  strike eliminates one-third of Israel&#8217;s nuclear arsenal (highly  unlikely). That still leaves Tel Aviv with almost 150 warheads for a  retaliatory attack. We should also note that Israeli weapons are much  more powerful than those initially available to Iran. In other words,  Israel&#8217;s nukes carry a far bigger punch and they would inflict far more  damage and casualties&#8211;against more targets&#8211;than Iran&#8217;s first strike. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">Additionally,  Tehran faces the daunting challenge of pinpointing and accurately  hitting Israel&#8217;s nuclear arsenal. True, Iranian intelligence knows the  location of Israeli fighter bases and its primary missile installation,  but their ability to track dispersed aircraft and missiles is severely  limited. That task is further complicated by the IDF&#8217;s extraordinary  skills at military denial and deception. Virtually every successful  campaign waged by Israeli forces has been accompanied by a detailed  deception campaign, giving the IDF strategic or tactical surprise. Given  that history, it&#8217;s quite possible that Israel would beat Iran to the  punch (with its own preemptive strike) or inflict a devastating  counter-strike, utilizing aircraft and missiles that survived Tehran&#8217;s  initial onslaught. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>So far, Israeli officials haven&#8217;t  exactly embraced the Obama proposal, for obvious reasons. Not only could  it limit Israel&#8217;s strike options, the security pledge also suggests  that the U.S. is willing to come to terms with a nuclear-armed Iran.  From the Israeli perspective, security guarantees against an Iranian  regime with nuclear weapons are simply unacceptable:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;What  is the significance of such guarantee when it comes from those who  hesitated to deal with a non-nuclear Iran?&#8221; asked a senior Israeli  security source. &#8220;What kind of credibility would this [guarantee have]  when Iran is nuclear-capable?&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">The  same source noted that the fact that there is talk about the  possibility of a nuclear Iran undermines efforts to prevent Tehran from  acquiring such arms. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Earlier this week, Mr. Obama said  he would offer Iran economic incentives for abandoning its nuclear  program. If that fails, he promised to intensify sanctions against the  Islamic Republic. <br \/>Readers will note that the president-elect and  his advisers still haven&#8217;t said what will happen when Tehran rejects  those incentives and the sanctions don&#8217;t work. Or (alternatively), they  take a page from the North Korean playbook and accept the economic  carrots, while taking their nuclear program underground. What happens  then? <br \/>It&#8217;s quite a jump from failed sanctions to a U.S. nuclear  counter-strike. Caution&#8211;and common sense&#8211;dictate that Washington have  some sort of intermediate steps, or at least allow Israel to defend  itself. In its current form, the Obama&#8217;s proposed policy for dealing  with Iran&#8211;and ensuring Israel&#8217;s security&#8211;has some rather gaping holes.  No wonder Tel Aviv reacted with such skepticism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Haaretz reports that President-elect Barack Obama will offer Israel additional protection against an Iranian nuclear attack, A source close to the incoming administration says Mr. Obama will propose placing Israel under our nuclear umbrella, meaning that any Iranian nuclear strike would bring a &#8220;devastating response&#8221; from the United States. The Obama team is not the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91895"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91895"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91895\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}