{"id":87227,"date":"2018-02-25T19:45:00","date_gmt":"2018-02-25T19:45:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-06T20:18:26","modified_gmt":"2023-01-06T20:18:26","slug":"the-impact-civil-war-1861-1865-on","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2018\/02\/25\/the-impact-civil-war-1861-1865-on\/","title":{"rendered":"The Impact the Civil War 1861-1865 on Economic, Politic and Industry Development in the USA"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h1 style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;\">The Impact the Civil War 1861-1865 on Economic, Politic and Industry Development in the USA<\/h1>\n<pre style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9; color: #333333; font-size: 12px; padding-left: 18px;\">                        NATIONAL PEDAGOGOC UNIVERSITY<br \/>                        FOREIGN PHILOLOGY DEPARTMENT<br \/><br \/><br \/><br \/>Tne Impact the Civil War 1861-1865 on Economic, Politic and Industry<br \/>Development in the USA<br \/><br \/><br \/><br \/>                                                   Written by<br \/>                                                   53-th  group student<br \/>                                                   Tatiana Ryabchun<br \/><br \/><br \/><br \/>                                 Kyiv, 2000<br \/><br \/><br \/>                               Reconstruction<br \/><br \/>      (1865-77), in U.S. history,  period  during  and  after  the  American<br \/>Civil War in which attempts were made to solve the  political,  social,  and<br \/>economic problems arising from the  readmission  to  the  Union  of  the  11<br \/>Confederate states that had seceded at or before the outbreak of war.<br \/>      As early as 1862, Pres.  Abraham  Lincoln  had  appointed  provisional<br \/>military  governors  for  Louisiana,  Tennessee,  and  North  Carolina.  The<br \/>following year, initial steps  were  taken  to  reestablish  governments  in<br \/>newly occupied states in which at least 10 percent of the voting  population<br \/>had taken the prescribed oath of allegiance.  Aware  that  the  presidential<br \/>plan omitted any  provision  for  social  or  economic  reconstruction,  the<br \/>Radical  Republicans  in  Congress  resented  such   a   lenient   political<br \/>arrangement under solely executive jurisdiction. As a result,  the  stricter<br \/>Wade-Davis Bill was passed in 1864 but pocket vetoed by the President.<br \/>      After Lincoln's  assassination  (April  1865),  Pres.  Andrew  Johnson<br \/>further alienated Congress by continuing Lincoln's  moderate  policies.  The<br \/>Fourteenth  Amendment,  defining  national  citizenship  so  as  to  include<br \/>blacks, passed Congress in June 1866 and was ratified, despite rejection  by<br \/>most Southern states (July 28, 1868). In response to  Johnson's  intemperate<br \/>outbursts  against  the  opposition  as  well  as  to  several   reactionary<br \/>developments in the South (e.g., race riots and  passage  of  the  repugnant<br \/>black codes severely  restricting  rights  of  blacks),  the  North  gave  a<br \/>smashing victory to  the  Radical  Republicans  in  the  1866  congressional<br \/>election.<br \/>      That victory launched the era of congressional Reconstruction (usually<br \/>called Radical Reconstruction), which lasted  10  years  starting  with  the<br \/>Reconstruction Acts of  1867.  Under  that  legislation,  the  10  remaining<br \/>Southern states (Tennessee had been readmitted to the Union  in  1866)  were<br \/>divided into five military districts; and, under  supervision  of  the  U.S.<br \/>Army, all were readmitted between 1868 and 1870. Each state  had  to  accept<br \/>the  Fourteenth  or,  if  readmitted  after  its  passage,   the   Fifteenth<br \/>Constitutional Amendment, intended to ensure civil rights of  the  freedmen.<br \/>The newly created state governments were generally Republican  in  character<br \/>and  were  governed  by  political  coalitions  of   blacks,   carpetbaggers<br \/>(Northerners who had gone into the South), and  scalawags  (Southerners  who<br \/>collaborated with the blacks and carpetbaggers). The Republican  governments<br \/>of the former Confederate states  were  seen  by  most  Southern  whites  as<br \/>artificial creations imposed from without, and the conservative  element  in<br \/>the region remained hostile to them. Southerners particularly  resented  the<br \/>activities of the Freedmen's  Bureau,  which  Congress  had  established  to<br \/>feed,  protect,  and  help  educate  the  newly  emancipated  blacks.   This<br \/>resentment led to formation of secret  terroristic  organizations,  such  as<br \/>the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camelia.  The  use  of  fraud,<br \/>violence, and intimidation helped Southern conservatives regain  control  of<br \/>their state governments, and, by the time the last Federal troops  had  been<br \/>withdrawn in 1877, the Democratic Party was back in power.<br \/>      About  1900,  many  U.S.  historians  espoused  a  theory  of   racial<br \/>inferiority of blacks. The Reconstruction  governments  were  viewed  as  an<br \/>abyss of corruption resulting from Northern vindictiveness  and  the  desire<br \/>for political and economic domination. Later, revisionist  historians  noted<br \/>that not only was public and private dishonesty widespread  in  all  regions<br \/>of the country at that time but also that a number of  constructive  reforms<br \/>actually were introduced into the South  during  that  period:  courts  were<br \/>reorganized,   judicial   procedures   improved,    public-school    systems<br \/>established, and more feasible methods of taxation devised. Many  provisions<br \/>of the state constitutions adopted during the postwar years  have  continued<br \/>in existence.<br \/>      The  Reconstruction  experience  led  to  an  increase  in   sectional<br \/>bitterness, an intensification of the racial issue, and the  development  of<br \/>one-party politics in the South. Scholarship has  suggested  that  the  most<br \/>fundamental failure of Reconstruction was in not  effecting  a  distribution<br \/>of land in the South that would have offered an  economic  base  to  support<br \/>the newly won political rights of black citizens.<br \/><br \/>                               Wade-Davis Bill<br \/>(1864), unsuccessful attempt by Radical Republicans and others in  the  U.S.<br \/>Congress to set Reconstruction policy before the end of the Civil  War.  The<br \/>bill, sponsored by senators Benjamin F. Wade and Henry  W.  Davis,  provided<br \/>for the  appointment  of  provisional  military  governors  in  the  seceded<br \/>states. When a majority of a state's white citizens swore allegiance to  the<br \/>Union,  a  constitutional  convention  could   be   called.   Each   state's<br \/>constitution was to be required to  abolish  slavery,  repudiate  secession,<br \/>and disqualify Confederate officials  from  voting  or  holding  office.  In<br \/>order to qualify for the franchise, a person would be required  to  take  an<br \/>oath that he had never voluntarily given aid to the  Confederacy.  President<br \/>Abraham Lincoln's pocket veto of the bill presaged the struggle that was  to<br \/>take place after the war between President Andrew Johnson  and  the  Radical<br \/>Republicans in Congress.<br \/>                                Property law<br \/>Ownership as the absolute right to possession<br \/>One may thus define ownership in the same way  that  the  legal  philosopher<br \/>Felix Cohen defined property: \"That  is  property  to  which  the  following<br \/>label can be attached:  To  the  world:  Keep  off  X  unless  you  have  my<br \/>permission,  which  I  may  grant  or  withhold.  Signed:  Private  citizen.<br \/>Endorsed: The state.\" Cohen, however, goes on to warn that all the terms  of<br \/>the definition \"shade off imperceptibly into other  things.\"  Consider,  for<br \/>example,  the  large  range  of  possibilities  encompassed  in  the  phrase<br \/>\"permission, which I may grant or withhold.\" In all  Western  legal  systems<br \/>there are a number of situations in which the law will  either  assume  that<br \/>permission has been granted or will require the  private  citizen  to  grant<br \/>his permission. The  situations  tend  to  be  dramatic:  Firefighters,  for<br \/>example, are usually allowed  to  enter  private  property  to  prevent  the<br \/>spread of a fire and frequently are authorized to destroy  private  property<br \/>in order to prevent the spread of a fire.<br \/>In the 1960s a  number  of  U.S.  Supreme  Court  cases  starkly  posed  the<br \/>conflict between the property owner's right to exclude and civil rights,  in<br \/>the context of \"sit-ins\" in restaurants that  were  excluding  customers  on<br \/>racial grounds. These cases suggested, if they did not quite hold,  that  in<br \/>this context the possessory right of the  restaurant  owner  would  have  to<br \/>yield to the civil-rights claim of those sitting in. In the  same  period  a<br \/>number of courts held that owners of farms could not exclude  visitors  from<br \/>agricultural migrant labour camps.<br \/>The conflict in these cases between property rights  and  civil  rights  was<br \/>made starker by the practice in the United States of treating social  issues<br \/>as constitutional controversies. The issue, however, of the use of  property<br \/>to discriminate against members of  the  society  whom  the  property  owner<br \/>disfavours is present  throughout  the  Western  world.  Ultimately  in  the<br \/>United States the problem of restaurant sit-ins  was  resolved  by  national<br \/>legislation that made it the duty of anyone providing  food  or  lodging  to<br \/>serve all comers without regard to race. Similar legislation exists in  many<br \/>Western countries, as does legislation allowing access to premises in  which<br \/>workers are employed.<br \/><br \/>                                 Black code<br \/>in the United States, any of numerous laws enacted  in  the  states  of  the<br \/>former Confederacy after the American Civil War, in 1865 and 1866; the  laws<br \/>were designed to replace the  social  controls  of  slavery  that  had  been<br \/>removed by the Emancipation Proclamation and  the  Thirteenth  Amendment  to<br \/>the Constitution, and were thus intended  to  assure  continuance  of  white<br \/>supremacy.<br \/>The black codes had their roots in the slave codes that  had  formerly  been<br \/>in effect. The general philosophy  supporting  the  institution  of  chattel<br \/>slavery in America was based on the concept that slaves were  property,  not<br \/>persons, and that the law must protect not only the property  but  also  the<br \/>property owner from the  danger  of  violence.  Slave  rebellions  were  not<br \/>unknown, and the possibility of uprisings was a constant source  of  anxiety<br \/>in colonies and then states  with  large  slave  populations.  (In  Virginia<br \/>during 1780-1864, 1,418  slaves  were  convicted  of  crimes;  91  of  these<br \/>convictions were for insurrection and  346  for  murder.)  Slaves  also  ran<br \/>away. In the British possessions in the New World, the  settlers  were  free<br \/>to promulgate any regulations they saw fit to govern  their  labour  supply.<br \/>As early as the 17th century, a set of rules was in effect in  Virginia  and<br \/>elsewhere; but the codes were constantly  being  altered  to  adapt  to  new<br \/>needs, and they varied from one colony, and later one state, to another.<br \/>All the slave codes, however, had certain provisions in common.  In  all  of<br \/>them the colour line was  firmly  drawn,  and  any  amount  of  Negro  blood<br \/>established the race of a person, whether  slave  or  free,  as  Negro.  The<br \/>status of the offspring followed that of the mother, so that the child of  a<br \/>free father and a slave mother was a slave. Slaves had few legal rights:  in<br \/>court their testimony was inadmissible in any litigation  involving  whites;<br \/>they could make no contract, nor could they own property; even if  attacked,<br \/>they could not strike a white person. There were  numerous  restrictions  to<br \/>enforce social  control:  slaves  could  not  be  away  from  their  owner's<br \/>premises without permission; they could not assemble unless a  white  person<br \/>was present; they could not own firearms; they could not be taught  to  read<br \/>or write, or transmit or possess \"inflammatory\" literature;  they  were  not<br \/>permitted to marry.<br \/>Obedience to the slave  codes  was  exacted  in  a  variety  of  ways.  Such<br \/>punishments as whipping, branding, and imprisonment were commonly used,  but<br \/>death (which meant destruction of property) was rarely called for except  in<br \/>such extreme cases as the rape or murder of a white  person.  White  patrols<br \/>kept the slaves under surveillance, especially at night.  Slave  codes  were<br \/>not always  strictly  enforced,  but  whenever  any  signs  of  unrest  were<br \/>detected the appropriate machinery of the state would  be  alerted  and  the<br \/>laws more strictly enforced.<br \/>The black codes enacted immediately after the  American  Civil  War,  though<br \/>varying from state to state, were all intended to secure a steady supply  of<br \/>cheap labour, and all continued to  assume  the  inferiority  of  the  freed<br \/>slaves. There were vagrancy laws that declared a  black  to  be  vagrant  if<br \/>unemployed and without permanent residence; a person  so  defined  could  be<br \/>arrested, fined, and bound out for a term of labour if  unable  to  pay  the<br \/>fine. Apprentice laws provided for the \"hiring out\"  of  orphans  and  other<br \/>young dependents to whites, who often turned out to be their former  owners.<br \/>Some states limited the type of property blacks could  own,  and  in  others<br \/>blacks were excluded from certain businesses or  from  the  skilled  trades.<br \/>Former slaves were forbidden to carry  firearms  or  to  testify  in  court,<br \/>except in cases concerning other blacks. Legal marriage between  blacks  was<br \/>provided for, but interracial marriage was prohibited.<br \/>It was Northern reaction to the black  codes  (as  well  as  to  the  bloody<br \/>antiblack riots in Memphis and New Orleans in 1866;  see  New  Orleans  Race<br \/>Riot) that helped produce Radical Reconstruction  (see  Reconstruction)  and<br \/>the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments. The Freedmen's Bureau  was  created<br \/>in 1865 to help the former slaves. Reconstruction did away  with  the  black<br \/>codes, but, after Reconstruction was over, many  of  their  provisions  were<br \/>reenacted in the Jim Crow laws, which were not finally done away with  until<br \/>passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.<br \/><br \/><br \/><br \/>                                 References:<br \/><br \/>1. Garraty, John A<br \/>A short history of the American  nation,  -  6th  ed.  \u2013  New  York  Collons<br \/>college publ, 1992<br \/>2. Ray Allen Willington,<br \/>American frontier heritage,- New Mexico, Press 1991<br \/>3. Thomas A. Bailey<br \/>David M. Kennedy<br \/>The American pageant, - 9th ed.- Toronto<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Impact the Civil War 1861-1865 on Economic, Politic and Industry Development in the USA NATIONAL PEDAGOGOC UNIVERSITY FOREIGN PHILOLOGY DEPARTMENTTne Impact the Civil War 1861-1865 on Economic, Politic and IndustryDevelopment in the USA Written by 53-th group student Tatiana Ryabchun Kyiv, 2000 Reconstruction (1865-77), in U.S. history, period during and after the AmericanCivil War [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87227"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}