{"id":111039,"date":"2017-11-30T10:26:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T10:26:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:06:14","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:06:14","slug":"plan-modernization-philosophy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/plan-modernization-philosophy\/","title":{"rendered":"PLAN modernization philosophy"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Most recently, I have been reading writings from pop3, a good source for  PLAN, on the upcoming Type 055 cruiser.  At the same, I have also been  reading and discussing the issue of India\u2019s purchase of Rafael fighter  jet.  While reading pop3\u2019s thoughts on PLAN development leading up to  Type 055, it made me really reflect on PLAN\u2019s philosophy in its drive to  modernization. <\/p>\n<p>When the news of India\u2019s purchase of Rafael came out, I was quite  surprised by how much money they are paying for just 36 Rafael. Of  course, India\u2019s leaders were eager to point out they had haggled down  price from over $13 billion to over $8 billion.  That claim would ignore  that the original MRCA rfp was to purchase 126 fighter jets for $8  billion.  Even so, it was quite shocking that when they finally settled  on direct purchase of 36 Rafael, the average total cost came out to be  well over $200 million.  If they had actually gotten all ToT and local  production from Dassault as they had originally wanted, the cost would  undoubtedly have been even higher.  If we ignore the service, support,  missiles and spare cost of this deal, the fly away cost + \u201cIndia  modification work\u201d would still come out to $160 million per aircraft.  I  think that would be higher than the fly away cost of F-35, J-20 and  probably PAK-FA.  For an air force that has continually complained about  lack of available squadrons, it seems very curious that price was not a  bigger factor in its MRCA competition.  To be fair, India is not the  only country in the world that ends up paying premium for the weapon  system that best fit its performance criteria. <\/p>\n<p>I think that most people would agree PLAN has done a really good job of  modernization up to this point.  They have managed to do so with little  access to Western exporters and relatively weak technology base (at  least back in the 90s).  At the same time, PLAN also had very limited  funding for much of 80s and 90s.   The question is what I have they done  right to get to this point.  It certainly helps that they have a  productive domestic shipbuilding industry and low cost manufacturing  base.  South Korea and Japan have also been able to build very powerful  ships at reasonable cost by leveraging their competitive shipbuilding  industry.  However, they both had access to all the major exporters,  which China does not have.  So what else allows China to modernize so  quickly? <\/p>\n<p>I think the first part is to look at the practical nature of its naval  acquisitions.  I want to focus on Type 054\/054A program in this example.   I read that France sold data of La Fayette frigate to China at the  same time it had sold the ships to Taiwan.  That certainly sped up their  development of hull of Type 054, but I think it also showed they were  very practical.  While La Fayette is a modern frigate design with  advanced signature reduction technology, it does have drawbacks in the  role of ASW escort.  It uses CODAD propulsion that is quite underpowered  and noisy (compared to something using COGAG propulsion like OHP class)  for ASW operations.  Type 054 and 054A have the same shortcomings.   Even so, PLAN recognized that it had access to all the components  (including the diesel engines) needed to serially produce a much better  frigate than Jiangwei class.  There was no reason to wait on a perfect  frigate for its requirements.  The interesting part is that only 2 Type  054 class frigates were built before they moved onto Type 054A.  Even  after they had built Type 054, they built 2 more Jiangwei class  frigates.  At the time they built Type 054, most of the subsystems for  Type 054A was not ready.  The development of Type 382 Sea Eagle radar  (looks like Top Plate) completed in 2002.  The development of Type 366  OTH radar (Chinese version of Mineral-ME) completed in 2004.  The AJK-16  weapon system (which fires HQ-16 missiles) only started land based  testing in 2004.  The actual testing on sea came after that.  The Yu-8  rocket assisted torpedo completed testing in 2006.  So none of these  subsystems were ready when Type 054 was laid down.  Instead, Type 054  was fitted with the AJK-02 weapon system (HQ-7) and Type 360 search  radar.  Looking at the firepower of Type 054 vs the most recent Jiangwei  units, I would say Type 054 is only slightly more powerful than those  Jiangwei.  Type 054 would be close to twice as expensive as Jiangwei,  but PLAN decided it was important to build and test out this new hull  design before adding the new subsystems.  When Type 054A was being  designed, Type 701 Institute could focus on just integrating the new  weapon system onto the same hull as Type 054.  Since that point, Type  054A has become the workhorse of PLAN even as newer technology and  weapon system has become available.  I think they found it more  important to mass-produce a good enough design since their frigates have  been modernized cheaply and quickly this way.  Each 054A probably costs  around $250 million, which is very cheap.  They can now wait for  available technology to catch up to design requirements of Type 054B,  since all of the older Type 053 frigates have already been replaced. <\/p>\n<p>Another interesting element is China\u2019s goal of not utilizing imports for  mass production.  Back when Type 052 project first started, China  simply did have the technology needed to build what PLAN wanted.  They  ended up importing various parts from various countries, but were dealt a  reality check when military embargo was put in place after the June 4th  student crackdown.  All of that caused delays in the development and  production of the 2 Type 052s.  I think Type 052 was way ahead of its  time in terms of the technology employed, but PLAN simply could not  afford to build more Type 052 until their military industrial complex  caught up.  Once that happened, they were still very cautious in  building 2 Type 052B, 2 Type 052C and 2 Type 051C before the mass  production of Type 052C happened.  They did not want to rely on  importing Ukrainian gas turbines, so waited until domestic version of  DA-80 was ready for production.  They were willing to test out new  technology like Type 346 radar and AJK-03 VLS on 2 ships, but were not  willing to mass-produce more Type 052Cs until the technology was more  mature.  Since QC-280 became available, Type 052C and 052D production  has been continuous.  It does not matter to PLAN if the subsystem is  foreign designed or inspired as long as domestic firms can produce them  cheaply.  Due to cost and lack of import options, PLAN was driven to  rely on domestic production for all of the new naval surface combatants.   One could say that PLAN modernization has completed now that probably  2\/3 of its ships have been replaced with modern designs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most recently, I have been reading writings from pop3, a good source for PLAN, on the upcoming Type 055 cruiser. At the same, I have also been reading and discussing the issue of India\u2019s purchase of Rafael fighter jet. While reading pop3\u2019s thoughts on PLAN development leading up to Type 055, it made me really [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111039"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111039"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111039\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}