{"id":111003,"date":"2017-11-30T10:51:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T10:51:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:57","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:57","slug":"j-20-program-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/j-20-program-update\/","title":{"rendered":"J-20 Program Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Prototype No. 2011 of the J-20 project had its maiden flight last  weekend.  As previously discussed, No. 2011 has significant changes to  the previous J-20 prototypes that we&#8217;ve seen in flight testing (No. 2001  and No. 2002).  There were probably 2 more prototypes similar to  2001\/2002 for the purpose of static and RCS testing.  It seems like  2001\/2002 are more like the demonstrator prototypes whereas 2011 is the  first pre-production prototype.  It&#8217;s likely that the production version  of J-20 will not see any major differences unless major problems are  found in testing.  The pictures below show prototype 2001 vs prototype  2011 from different view point with Chinese labels on parts that changed  in the first 2 pictures.<br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/s13.postimg.org\/p3oplbrnb\/2011vs2001.jpg\" width=\"400\" \/><br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/s29.postimg.org\/4lr93d81j\/2011vs2001_2.jpg\" width=\"400\" \/><br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/farm3.staticflickr.com\/2694\/12974351163_cdf0c93e47_o.jpg\" width=\"400\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Generally speaking, CAC appears to have taken much greater care for the  LO properties of No. 2011 compared to 2001\/2002.  Quite a bit of type  elapsed from 2002 to 2011 and it looks like they really tried to address  a lot of issues from RCS testing. The workmanship and fit\/finishing of  2011 all appear to be better.  Some of the more obvious changes include <\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Clipped corners on canard\/v-tails<\/li>\n<li>Redesign slender intakes with bump larger or protruding more<\/li>\n<li>F-22-style light-grey colour scheme<\/li>\n<li>Larger weapon bay and smaller wing actuators<\/li>\n<li>Straightened leading edge<\/li>\n<li>Inner canopy frame like F-35<\/li>\n<li>Redesigned front landing gear door<\/li>\n<li>New EOTS-like sensor and holographic HUD display<\/li>\n<li>Redesigned rear fuselage around the engines and nozzles moved further in with longer tail sting.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>It seems like more care is put into all-aspect stealth as the clipped  canards has decreased returns from some angles and the ventral fins now  seem to  completely block engine nozzles from the sides.  Looking at the  inner edge of the canard, they are modified to conform nicely around  intake so as to not create gaps.<\/p>\n<p>Here is a good side view of the front part of the prototype.<br \/><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/farm3.staticflickr.com\/2716\/12974340804_8f5870334f_o.jpg\" width=\"400\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Comparing to other 5th generation projects, I think PLAAF had a higher  LO design requirement for J-20 than PAK-FA, while still trailing  F-22\/35.  Compared to PAK-FA, it looks like everything conform to the  body a lot better leaving fewer gaps and deflecting surfaces all around.   Compared to F-22, it still has some areas like engine nozzle (which is  covered by thrust vectoring plates on F-22) that are just not as well  shielded even after the treatments. This is all from my extremely  untrained eyes, so feel free to give me additional insights.<\/p>\n<p>Project 310, China&#8217;s other next-gen project, at this point still has not  received official PLAAF designation.  It looks to be in the flight  demonstration stage and would probably need to become an offical PLAAF  program before proceeding further to where J-20 is right now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prototype No. 2011 of the J-20 project had its maiden flight last weekend. As previously discussed, No. 2011 has significant changes to the previous J-20 prototypes that we&#8217;ve seen in flight testing (No. 2001 and No. 2002). There were probably 2 more prototypes similar to 2001\/2002 for the purpose of static and RCS testing. It [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111003"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111003"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111003\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}