{"id":110999,"date":"2017-11-30T10:53:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T10:53:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:57","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:57","slug":"some-thoughts-on-5th-gen-projects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/some-thoughts-on-5th-gen-projects\/","title":{"rendered":"Some thoughts on 5th gen projects"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Last week, we got news out of India that they are not happy with the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.business-standard.com\/article\/economy-policy\/russia-can-t-deliver-on-fifth-generation-fighter-aircraft-iaf-114012100059_1.html\">progress of PAK-FA project<\/a>.   The article says that IAF found FGFA (their version of PAK-FA) to be  too expensive, not have enough technology sharing with India and use  inadequate engine solution.  On top of that, IAF has also declared in  the most recent meeting that the radar is inadequate and the stealth  features badly engineered.<\/p>\n<p>So, what does all of this tell us?  It sounds to me that IAF&#8217;s biggest  concern here is with their work share in the project.  They are trying  to put the pressure on the Russians to share more of the technology that  Russia is simply not prepared to share.  We&#8217;ve heard similar complaints  from India in the past regarding other projects with Russians.  The  other complaint of escalating costs seems also be a negotiation tactic.   Cost overrun seems to be a common issue with all the new military  aviation projects.  The article itself even mentioned that MMRCA  project&#8217;s escalating costs is part of the reason that IAF is complaining  here.<\/p>\n<p>The technical issues are something that I think PLAAF followers should  look carefully at.  We know that China still depends very heavily on  Russia in high performance turbofan engines right now.  China invested  large amount of resources in the 99M project, which is still lagging in  progress to the 117S project used on Su-35.  If Russia is having trouble  developing and mass producing a new generation of engine for 5th gen  aircraft, then one can imagine the stumbling blocks facing WS-15 project  and other next generation Chinese turbofan projects.  Up to now, all  indications are that WS-15 development is going well, but as we&#8217;ve seen  from WS-10 project, the mass production version of a new engine takes  some time to sort out problems.  So, it remains to be seen whether or  not WS-15 will be ready by the end of this decade.<\/p>\n<p>The other issue of inadequate radar with PAK-FA is less of an issue with  J-20.  China is ahead of Russia in electronics and are ready to cost  efficiently produce the components needed for AESA radar, whereas Russia  is not.  I believe that China has even tried to sell AESA radars to  Russia.  It appears that J-10B and J-16 will be equipped with the 1st  and 1.5th generation of AESA radar, so China&#8217;s AESA technology should be  a lot more mature by the time J-20 is in mass production.  Even so, one  has to look at the whole systems of avionics.  F-35 is said to have  more than 8 million lines of code to manage all of the weapon and  sensory subsystems to give unprecedented situation awareness to the  pilot.  However with such a complex system, any software engineer can  tell you that it would take a long time to test out such a complicated  system.  There is quite a few articles on issues with the complexity of  F-35 code.  When it comes to J-20, CAC has smartly been using J-10B as a  testbed for a bunch of next generation avionics that will help with  J-20&#8217;s integrated avionics architecture development.  I think it partly  explains why J-10B took so long to go into production.  When it comes to  J-20, we are likely to see similar delays due to avionics that we&#8217;ve  seen with F-35.  My guess is that IAF chief will be complaining a lot  about avionics delays on PAK-FA as we get closer to induction time.<\/p>\n<p>Stealth is probably the biggest issue with PAK-FA compared to western  definition of 5th generation aircraft.  When I look at PAK-FA, it looks  to be stealthier than the 4th generation fighter jets, but just can&#8217;t  compare to F-22\/35.  IAF chief would have known about this all along.   Just in my non-professional eyes, J-20 looks to be stealthir than  PAK-FA, but is probably closer to PAK-FA in lo technology than F-22\/35.   Stealth technology is probably the biggest advantage that Lockheed and  Boeing have over the Russian and Chinese aircraft companies.<\/p>\n<p>So I find that IAF complaints over PAK-FA just shows how difficult it is  to develop 5th generation aircraft.  Only US, China and Russia are  actively developing these aircraft.  And if you ask some Western defense  analyst, they would say J-20 and PAK-FA don&#8217;t qualify as truly lo  platforms.  These are extremely advanced technologies, so it&#8217;s not  surprising that Russia is reluctant to share them with India.  Cost  escalations are common.  We don&#8217;t really hear about it on Chinese  military aviation projects, but it probably has similar cost escalation  as F-35 and PAK-FA.  From that, I think it&#8217;s quite interesting that  China can still afford J-20 and J-31 (supposedly will be made official  PLAAF project) at the same time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, we got news out of India that they are not happy with the progress of PAK-FA project. The article says that IAF found FGFA (their version of PAK-FA) to be too expensive, not have enough technology sharing with India and use inadequate engine solution. On top of that, IAF has also declared in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110999"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}