{"id":110991,"date":"2017-11-30T10:57:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T10:57:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:52","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:52","slug":"the-state-of-domestic-military-aviation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/the-state-of-domestic-military-aviation\/","title":{"rendered":"The state of domestic military aviation projects"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Over the past 5 years, we can see the dramatic improvement in the  hardware of Chinese navy from all of the really nice new ships that have  come out.  As naval fleet has improved, it\u2019s always been a wonder if  the same advances can be found in aviation projects.<\/p>\n<p>So far, we\u2019ve seen both real success stories and areas where things are  going slower than expected.  In the civilian field, it seems like most  of the projects are going rather badly.  ARJ-21 is turning into a  nightmare.  At this point, it appears that AVIC-1 completely  underestimated the work needed in integration that components, going  through all of the needed test flights and most importantly actually  certifying an aircraft.  Even the certification process in China has  dragged on way past the original delivery date.  I think that C919  started off on a much better footing with greater involvement from  foreign partners.  However, we are now hearing news on those partners  rethinking their commitment to the program and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/2013-08-06\/comac-said-to-delay-maiden-flight-for-china-s-first-large-plane.html\">impending delay of maiden flight<\/a>.   These are not surprising since most major airliner projects experience  delays these days.  However, I think all that we have seen from ARJ-21  and C-919 projects would indicate that China has a lot to learn here.   The learning curve in designing, certifying and building airliners is a  very complicated process.  There is a reason only Boeing and Airbus are  capable of building the larger airliners.  China needs to accept any  help it can get from Western partners in an industry where few companies  are willing to share their secrets.  These are the reasons why China  was so eager to partner up with Bombardier and also set up local  production with Embraer and Airbus.<\/p>\n<p>One of the bright spots in both civilian and military field is the  improvements we have seen in the helicopter industry.  There was a time  when China was only capable of producing single digit number of  helicopter per year, but that is no longer the case.  When I first  started following PLA, the insufficient number of helicopters was very  obvious to see and widely talked about, but we have finally turned a  corner.  In this past 2 years, we\u2019ve seen 5 new Z-10 regiments deployed  on top of the original one in addition to 5 Z-19 regiments.  That works  out to be around 120 helicopters a year.  This is on top of the  different variants of Z-8 and Z-9 helicopters that we are seeing coming  into service with various arms.  We\u2019ve seen civilian Z-8 (AC-313),  Z-8J\/H for the larger naval ships, Z-8K\/A for the air force and 5  regiments of Z-8A\/B for the army in transportation role.  This trend  should only get better as China continues to get more involved in the  world\u2019s helicopter market and have license to build more advanced  turbo-shaft engines.  The dual use nature of the helicopter industry has  really allowed transfer of knowledge\/technology from civilian projects  to military projects.  In a decade or so, the Z-15 project should become  the work horse of PLA and PLAN.   The Z-20 and the heavy helo transport  project will also join service sometimes this decade, which will  finally fill the void in 10 ton class and 20+ ton class.<\/p>\n<p>Another relatively bright spot is in the development and deployment of  UAV and UCAV projects.  China has really been putting a lot of  investments in the recent years in civilian and military UAV.  Every  Zhuhai air show, we see a host of new UAV models of display.  Some of  them have now been exported, while other ones have entered service with  PLA or civilian arms.  We\u2019ve seen an increasing number of S-100  servicing in the navy, BZK-006 with the army while still waiting for the  air force to settle on UAV and UCAV.<\/p>\n<p>Moving onto the world of fighter jets, we can assess China\u2019s progress by  looking at AVIC1\u2019s two big players:  SAC and CAC.  Two years ago, CAC  looked to have finally become the top dog of AVIC1.  J-20 had just been  unveiled; J-10B was in the middle of testing and UAVs like Wing Loong  and Soar Dragon were popping up everywhere.  All this was on top of mass  producing the backbone fighter jet of PLAAF (J-10) and PAF (JF-17).   For much of last 2 years, it seemed like CAC was muddling along with not  much progress while SAC was really well.  It felt as if CAC had devoted  all of its resources in developing J-20 and did not have enough left  for other projects.  Most recently, we have seen some good news out of  CAC.  It appears that CAC may finally be getting a third flying J-20  prototype (if that hasn\u2019t happened already) and the low rate production  for J-20 may have started.  The J-10A production has finally drawn to a  close with J-10B finally entering mass production after more than 4  years of test flight.  There are also speculations of J-10C, but we  haven\u2019t seen any of that yet.  In the world of UAVs, Wing Loong had its  first export sales while soar dragon is finally making test flights.   Probably the biggest deal recently was when rumour came out that CAC has  beaten SAC for the next generation naval fighter jet project.  So, we  may see a naval version of J-20 in the future rather than J-31.<\/p>\n<p>SAC have been enjoying a more successful past two years.  It had  received a lot of criticisms for slow progress in J-11B program and  continued production of J-8 series, but a lot of those blames should be  placed on Shenyang Liming and PLAAF.  Since WS-10A mass production has  really started, we\u2019ve seen many new regiments of J-11B\/S entering  service with both PLAAF and PLANAF.  J-15 and J-16 projects seem to also  be going well recently, which has continued to raise their profile.   I\u2019ve definitely heard of some bad things in all 3 flanker projects, but  Shenyang has been doing well with them over all.  The J-31 project has  also been a pleasant revelation in the past year or soon.  Now, there is  news that they are about to showcase a new 5th generation design that  will be more impressive than J-31.  Just as importantly, their stealthy  UCAV design Lijian surprised a lot of people this year.  As a whole, SAC  has been very busy and showing a lot of good results.<\/p>\n<p>Xi\u2019an AC and Shaanxi AC have been progressing, but not seem to be  advancing too much.  We have seen continued production of JH-7A, but  have not seen any possible replacement for it.  It is quite possible  that J-16 will be taking over that role and reducing XAC\/SAC to only  developing strategic bombers and transports.  Y-9 and H-6K are nice  improvements over Y-8C and older H-6 variants, but they are not next  generational designs that would push forward Chinese aviation industry.   It\u2019s quite possible that most of their resources have been spent on the  Y-20 project, which made its maiden flight this year.  It will be a few  more years before we can see mass production of Y-20.  The one really  bright area is the ever increasing number of Y-8 based special mission  aircraft that have entered service.  Hopefully, we will continue to see  improved production rate in XAC and SAC factories, so that China will  not have to depend on imported Il-76 \/78 much longer.<\/p>\n<p>The one area that has really been dragging China behind is aerospace  engine.  The problems experienced in WS-10A program caused delays in  J-11B program.  I think Shenyang Liming and other AVIC engine factories  have really experienced the difficulties in taking a new design and  maintaining quality\/reliability in mass production.  China has never  developed a high performance turbofan engine like WS-10A before this, so  the problems in J-11B should probably be expected.  As we go forward  with projects like WS-13, improved Taihang, WS-15, WS-18 and WS-20, it\u2019s  important to note that it takes time to really sort out issues with a  new engine.  Hopefully, AVIC1 has learnt lessons from Taihang projects  in going from testing out a few prototypes of an engine to mass  producing it.  We have yet to see WS-13 really equipping JF-17, even  though it should have happened by now.  Until then, China\u2019s Achilles  Heel remains propulsion.  Since Russia is not exactly fast with its new  development, high priority aircraft projects will be delayed if these  domestic options fall behind.<\/p>\n<p>On a whole, China\u2019s aviation industry definitely has experienced ups and  downs in the last couple of years.  We\u2019ve seen some real improvements  in many helicopter and fighter jet projects, whereas civilian aviation  and engines have been struggling.  As a whole, I think this part of the  growing pain.  China\u2019s civilian aviation industry will need continued  investment if it hopes to catch up to Western competitors.  Military  aviation projects can only benefit from that.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the past 5 years, we can see the dramatic improvement in the hardware of Chinese navy from all of the really nice new ships that have come out. As naval fleet has improved, it\u2019s always been a wonder if the same advances can be found in aviation projects. So far, we\u2019ve seen both real [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110991"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110991"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110991\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110991"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110991"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110991"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}