{"id":110984,"date":"2017-11-30T11:01:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T11:01:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:48","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:48","slug":"china-maritime-disputes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/china-maritime-disputes\/","title":{"rendered":"China&#39;s maritime disputes"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>In light of the recent entry by Galrahn on the issue of China&#8217;s  expanded map, I want to just put my thoughts on this.&nbsp; I was originally  thinking of writing a separate entry on the dramatic expansion of  China&#8217;s maritime surveillance agencies of CMS and FLEC, but I want to  spend a little time just looking at the non-military part of this.<\/p>\n<p>The  main point I want to make here is that China&#8217;s border dispute with  entirely different than its border dispute with India and the countries  around South China Sea.&nbsp; We often read about China&#8217;s recent actions have  made neighbouring countries feel uneasy and have pushed them toward  America.&nbsp; While I do agree the other countries reactions have been  similar, it&#8217;s important to note that these are different issues for  Chinese people.<\/p>\n<p>And this has everything to do with the  historical relationship of the two countries.&nbsp; It starts from 1895 when  China was badly defeated by Japan, who it had always looked upon as a  vassal nation.&nbsp; The unfair treaty which resulted in war reparation in  addition to annexation of Taiwan was followed up by the brutal  Russo-Japanese war of 1905 which was fought over Chinese soil and  resulted in the Japanese control of Lushun (Port Arthur).&nbsp; Of course,  all of this was small compared to the occupation of Manchuria in 1931  and second Sino-Japanese War between 1937 and 1945.&nbsp; The Chinese side  has claimed that around 20 million civilians were killed during this  conflict.&nbsp; If that&#8217;s true, it would in effect be the equivalent of 3  holocausts.&nbsp; I do not know how accurate these numbers are, but I did  hear a story (growing up) where my friend&#8217;s ancestor was tortured to  death by Japanese soldiers.&nbsp; And my opinion is that most people born in  my generation or prior in China probably have heard of such stories from  their family or friends.&nbsp; When I visited Nanjing in 2006, I was told by  locals that the only place not pillaged during the Nanking massacre was  the Sun Yat-Sen memorial.&nbsp; Even by then, Japanese business was not  allowed on the city&#8217;s premise.&nbsp; There has been a lot of anger within  China toward Japan in the past 10 years due to the visits by Koizumi\/Abe  of the Yasukuni Shrine and the denials of wartime atrocities by some  Japanese Nationalists.&nbsp; While I do not think that the Japanese  government is denying th war atrocities, I do think a lot of people in  China would feel better toward Japanese if the Japanese government adopt  the same attitude toward this subject as Germany has adopted toward the  Holocaust.&nbsp; When something like the recent Diaoyu\/Senkaku dispute came  up, it came across as another reminder of Japanese aggression for  Chinese people.&nbsp; Back when the two countries normalized relations in  1978, Deng Xiaoping made a strategic decision to not overly press Japan  over this issue in exchange of money and technology to help with the  Chinese economy.&nbsp; And I think while China was still economically weak  and needing Japan, this was something it was willing to do (not overly  voicing past grievances).&nbsp; However with China&#8217;s growing power in the  past 10 years, this is no longer the case, so the current generation of  Chinese population and officials do not see the need to hold pacifying  attitude toward Japan.&nbsp; With the Koizumi\/Abe visits, all of these  anger\/grievances from the past 60 years flared up and it is tough for me  to see how relations between China\/Japan will get better.<\/p>\n<p>The  difference between the Diaoyu\/Senkaku dispute and the South China Sea  dispute is that the entire Chinese population is invested in this  issue.&nbsp; It&#8217;s not just the PLA or a group of nationalist cranks on the  internet forums that are passionate about this, it&#8217;s the ordinary  people.&nbsp; You&#8217;ve seen that with the wide spread boycotting of Japanese  business in the past few months due to the outrage in China over the  entire Diaoyu\/Senkaku issues.&nbsp; This is not just a couple of islands.&nbsp;  This is 70 years of grievances.&nbsp; It&#8217;s also seen in the expansion of  civilian maritime patrol fleet.&nbsp; In the past few months, 11 ships from  PLAN have been sent to the shipyards to be retrofitted and removed of  weaponry so that they can join the CMS fleet and patrol the disputed  regions with Japan.&nbsp; And I think that until the Japanese government  adopts an attitude toward its World War II crimes toward China (and  South Korea) as Germany has toward Israel, there will always be that  underlying tension that makes all border disputes even worse.&nbsp; I think  that the relationship between the two countries have gotten so bad that  it may be more likely a conflict will break out between China and Japan  rather than China and Taiwan in the next 10 years.&nbsp; That&#8217;s really  unfortunate, because the two countries have so much to gain in this  economically unstable period if they can somehow move past this issue  and resolve past grievances.<\/p>\n<p>As a last point, it really  bugs me that Japan is often put in the same category as  Vietnam\/Philippines with regards to needing American help to defend  itself against the big bad Chinese.&nbsp; Even with the rise of PLAN, JMSDF  is still clearly the stronger force at this time.&nbsp; The Japanese civilian  patrol fleet is also a very powerful fleet, so it is not going to be  scared away by the presence of a few 1500 ton CMS cutters.&nbsp; In fact, CMS  has this huge build up just so that it can get somewhat close to the  size of its Japanese counterpart.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In light of the recent entry by Galrahn on the issue of China&#8217;s expanded map, I want to just put my thoughts on this.&nbsp; I was originally thinking of writing a separate entry on the dramatic expansion of China&#8217;s maritime surveillance agencies of CMS and FLEC, but I want to spend a little time just [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110984"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110984\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}