{"id":110951,"date":"2017-11-30T11:42:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T11:42:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:33","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:33","slug":"reflection-on-watching-numerous-recent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/reflection-on-watching-numerous-recent\/","title":{"rendered":"Reflection on watching numerous recent documentaries on China"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Last week, I officially quit from my job.  I am currently in the middle  of an one-week hiatus before starting my new job.  As such, I&#8217;ve had  some time to watch <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Peoples-Republic-Capitalism-Ted-Koppel\/dp\/B001O7R75Y\">Ted Koppel&#8217;s piece<\/a> on China (People&#8217;s republic of capitalism) and part of Paul Merton&#8217;s  trip to China.  I think Ted Koppel&#8217;s 4 part mini-series on China was  simply brilliant.  For anyone who is trying to learn about future  US-China relationship, that series would be a good place to start off.   As I watch the series, I really begun to think about several major  questions.  How did China change so quickly?  Were the policies of  economic liberation really as great as people think they are?  Why are  Chinese businesses so competitive now and can they be this competitive  in the future?  Why is the politburo so paranoid about social stability  and order?  Can democracy and more importantly human rights be delivered  in the country without stopping the economic progress?  And most  importantly, what would happen if the current economic growth in China  stop?  Ted Koppel brought up the point that it should not be too  surprising if there will be another huge revolution\/revolt that uproots  the system when that happens.  Considering the current rein on power  that the communist party has on the China, that really seems to be a  far-fetched idea.  I watched some documentary from Mao&#8217;s time (<a href=\"http:\/\/video.google.com\/videoplay?docid=3439076506613505887\">China &#8211; Mao Bloody Revolution Revealed<\/a>) and also on Deng in the past 24 hours and have a slightly different prospective.<\/p>\n<p>There  have often been a lot of criticisms in the Western media regarding  human rights in China.  A lot of that is well deserved.  As shown in  Koppel&#8217;s documentary (and also could be confirmed by anyone that lived  in China for more than a month), the amount of corruption and the driven  for greed is astounding; and has caused so much injustice in the  country (many in the form of human right violations like forcible  eviction).  Koppel&#8217;s interview with billionaire Vincent Lo really  revealed some interesting points.  Mr. Lo basically made several major  points<br \/>&#8211; while he is not happy about China&#8217;s human rights record, but they have to start somewhere.<br \/>&#8211;  the autocratic gov&#8217;t has gone from socialism to become the world&#8217;s most  business friendly government with a constitution of economic  development.<br \/>&#8211; this current autocratic system has delivered 300  million people out of poverty in 30 years and democracy could not have  done that<br \/>&#8211; assurance of stable gov&#8217;t + policies allow investors like  himself get involved in the Chinese economy and deliver more wealth to  the country<br \/>So, does that mean we should accept or tolerate such human right abuses and lack of democracy in the country.<\/p>\n<p>For  this, I watched a documentary on Mao by Phillip Short of BBC and  reflected also on past documentaries I watched + what I know from  growing up in China.  There have been several documentaries made about  Mao in the past 15 years as foreigners became allowed to interview  people close to Mao at that time.  None of which are flattering to Mao.   Simply put, there have been 4 major man-caused disasters since the  founding of CCP in the 1920s.  The first two were the Japanese invasion  in 1937-1945 and the civil war in 1946-1949.  The next two were both  caused by Mao himself in the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural  Revolution.  I knew that things were really bad during the years of  great leap forward, but didn&#8217;t really know how bad they were until  seeing that 20+ million people died of starvation from 1958-1962.  It  was especially disconcerting to read that cannibalism was quite common  during that period (mostly of dead people, but also of living in some  cases).  Even through all of this mass starvation, the gov&#8217;t continued  the insane policies of exporting grains to other countries to pay off  Soviet debts and to look self sufficient in front of outside nations.  I  guess my family was not as affected by those years because we lived in  the cities.  However, the urban dwellers had their turn in front of the  gun when Cultural Revolution came.  All through China, urban youths were  sent to the countryside to help the motherland.  The intellectuals and  the slightly wealthy urban dwellers and supporters of sacked leaders  were all publicly humiliated and beaten.  There were many stories of  deans of universities and principals of schools getting beaten to death  or committing suicide after being tortured.  Worst of all, some of the  most precious art, literature and historical places were destroyed by  the brainwashed youth also known as the Red Guards.  Personally  speaking, my mother&#8217;s parents were both severely persecuted because of  their educational background.  The Mao era had none of the war and  foreign occupation that plagued the country for the 100 years before  that.  However, it was replaced by a psychotic leader that managed to  brainwash much of the population and destroyed all possible political  opponents through radical ideological movements (Cultural Revolution and  other major purges).  Other than Zhou Enlai and Zhu De, all of the  other major revolutionaries like Peng Dehuai, Liu Shaoqi, Deng Xiaoping  and many other generals were purged, humiliated and tortured.  The  administration was infected by leftist radicals like the Gang of Four,  Mao himself and Lin Biao to a lesser degree.  The succession of Deng  Xiaoping over Hua GuoFeng in late 1970s was the first time in the recent  Chinese history where a succession happened over a unified China  without blood spilling or purges.  And thankfully, they have finally put  in a system that would allow for peaceful transition of power and that  would prevent future emergence of charismatic leader (like Mao himself).   If this series of events sound crazy, one has to realize that this was  nothing new in the Chinese history.  Unfortunately, Chinese history is  marred by continuous cycles of internal war, mass starvation, political  purges by emperors and village rebellions that led to new deification of  rebellion leader as an emperor God.<\/p>\n<p>In Koppel&#8217;s documentary, he  interviewed a bunch of villager who insisted that life is better now  than it has ever been.  Their explanation was that &#8220;the army no longer  forces people to join.  And we are no longer forced to move off our  land.&#8221;  And the oldest women in the village said that right now is the  best time to live because they have enough food to eat and enough  clothes to wear.  Some may think these are extraordinary statements or  that the Chinese population has set their standards way too low.   However, one only has to look at the past to see how much things have  moved.  When my parents were in their early 20s, they were working at  textile factories and villages in the midst of the Cultural Revolution.   All form of higher education were stopped (even most lower level of  education were stopped), so their dreams of going to university were  sitting in vain.  When my grandparents were in their early 20s, China  was involved in the two major wars of this century.  A lot of their  friends were killed by Japanese brutality and then by the civil war.   When my great grandparents were in their early 20s, China had just  became a republic and was in the midst of constant infighting between  local warlords.  It should not be hard to see why the Chinese gov&#8217;t  fears change and instability so much.  Deng Xiaoping what happened to  China in the 60s and 70s when the country went into policies without  pragmatism and caution.  His philosophy of control, pragmatism and  caution has been passed onto all of the current leaders.  Outside of the  TianAnMen Square crackdown, one can hardly argue against this period of  peace, political stability and economical growth in China.  A lot of  people on the top are fearful that if their current hold on power is  taken away, the country will go back into chaos like prior to 1978.  <\/p>\n<p>It  is very easy to credit Deng Xiaoping and recent administrations for  China&#8217;s success in the past 30 years, but are they really that  responsible?  Looking back at the period right after Mao&#8217;s death, the  Chinese population was ready to open itself up to the rest of the world  and embrace capitalism.  I think that opening up the country to Western  investment and technology was the smartest thing that the gov&#8217;t did once  the relations were normalized with the Western countries.  From his  past experiences at the top, Deng Xiaoping saw the need for pragmatic  engagement with the West over extreme ideological warfare.  According to  this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.hoover.org\/publications\/policyreview\/72997307.html\">well written article by Hoover Institution<\/a>,  the Chinese people were hungry by then for political reform.  They were  even acting out illegally in many cases to make money for their  families.  During the late 70s and early 80s, the younger generation  were kids when the great leap forward happened and teenagers when the  cultural revolution happened.  I think they became disillusioned of  class struggle and socialism after being starved and later sent to the  farms.  The older generation still had enough memory of the period of  society prior to 1949.  I think both generations had suffered enough by  then and really wanted to work hard to make lives better for their kids.   Even today, the older generation in China are the younger generation  of the late 70s, so they still remembered the chaos, starvation, poverty  and hard times.  They don&#8217;t really mind to work super hard to ensure  better future for their kids.  And I think Ted Koppel&#8217;s documentary was a  perfect illustration of what every poor Chinese family are willing to  do for their kids.  He made a perfect point later in an extra interview  that &#8220;Chinese people probably deserve to go to the hall of fame for  enduring hardship and suffering&#8221;.  When you look at Ted Koppel&#8217;s  interview with the owner of Lifan, you can see the prototypical hardened  Chinese entrepreneur that is willing to do whatever it takes to make it  in the capitalistic world.  You also hear about this with many of the  other successful business men in China.  They have succeeded because of  their hardened experience during the great leap forward and the cultural  revolution.  They know that the only way forward is to beat out your  competition in any possible way.  So, I think that China is thriving in  the world economy now, because the people that are driving the economic  growth are the same people who were hardened through the Mao-caused  disasters.  It is beating out competitions around the world like Japan  did in the 50s\/60s because it has a very driven group of people willing  to endure hardship.  I think that the recent regime&#8217;s main role through  all of this time is to continue a stable environment to allow Chinese  people to better their own lives.  Deng and the following leaders were  smart enough to not stop a good thing when it has already started.  The  only thing that prevented this from happening for the 100 years prior to  that were continued chaos, utter lunacy in power and the numerous wars.   And maybe Deng&#8217;s policy of maintaining stability and not stopping good  things is the best anyone can ever hope a government to do.  The  question as we move forward is whether or not China can continue to  strive in the world market when the future generation that came in after  the start of the single child policy become the drivers of the economy.   Can the Chinese population still work hard and endure suffering when  most of the people grew up being spoiled and pampered by their parents.<\/p>\n<p>So  in the past 30 years, we have gone from a society of total chaos and  starvation to a society of vibrant growth with large degree of personal  freedom.  It is hard to imagine that China will ever go back to the Mao  days.  In fact, I read a recent article where Chinese tourists started  to complain about lack of freedom after a day of visit in North Korea.   Today&#8217;s North Korea is probably where China was at the time of Cultural  Revolution.  In fact, the evolution of North Korea from a state that was  wealthier and more industrialized than South Korea in the 60s to the  pariah state that it is today is a very good parallel to what happened  to China in the 60s and 70s.  Knowing all of this, the question is what  holds in the future for China in terms of democracy and human rights.  I  think it was very interesting that Ted Koppel mentioned in several  places that what he saw or many of the interviews that he was happening  could not have happened 15 years ago or even 5 years ago.  This shows a  gradual change in the personal freedom that we are seeing in the  ordinary citizens.  For example, I don&#8217;t think the administration would  be able to survive the internal backlash from a crackdown like the one  in TianAnMen Square.  Actually ever since the death of Deng Xiaoping, no  civilian leader will ever have the same power to control the military.   That is a good thing, because the politburo members have to retire  after 2 terms of power.  And we are certainly seeing a lot of checks and  balances within the PSC to prevent a God-like leader ever appearing  again.  As the power at the top have slowly faded from Mao to Deng to  Jiang to Hu and to Xi Jinping in the future, the question is whether or  not we can have a peaceful transition to some form of electoral based  system.  I think that a transition to elecoral based system will happen  in the next 20 years, but I hope it does not come as a result of a  violent national uprising by the disenfranchised over the wealth gap  between the haves and the have-nots.  Even though today&#8217;s system is  causing a lot of corruption, injustice and wealth gap, it has vastly  improved the lives of most Chinese people.  I think that a complete  repudiation of this system would cause chaos and economic disaster in  the short term.<\/p>\n<p>Even so, I do hope for some kind of repudiation  in the future.  I think that the mistakes that Mao made in the Great  Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution will never be properly revealed  to the Chinese public unless this system is shaken.  Deng continued the  legacy of Mao and the legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party by  maintaining that Mao&#8217;s contribution to history was 70% good and 30% bad.   I cannot see CCP go any further in repudiating Mao because 1) that  would take away their legitimacy in power; 2) the population just  doesn&#8217;t care anymore.  And I think my second point is probably the  sadest of all.  Even from my parent&#8217;s generation, they have grown up  with the view that Mao was this great leader that unified China but made  some mistakes along the way.  Leaders like Liu Shaoqi and Peng Dehuai  have been rehabilitated, but they have never received the credit they  deserved for bringing China out of the Great Leap Forward and trying to  run the country.  Most of the blames for the Cultural Revolution should  rest upon Mao rather than the Gang of Four or Lin Biao.  Even though he  unified the country and kicked out the foreigners, he also set the  nation back to stone ages with his insane economic policies and  political movements.  In the future, 95% of the new generation of  Chinese would grow up never know about how bad things were between the  early 1950s and 1978.  And I think that is a mistake, because they need  to learn about the past to not repeat it again in the future.  So, I  hope that as people demand for better rule of law and more freedom in  the future, the government will incrementally become more open about its  past.  More transparency from the gov&#8217;t on these matters is certainly  better than having its own citizens watching documentaries of Mao on  youtube (some of which are quite biased).  There is a major bubble  forming in the Chinese economy.  Once that bubble bursts, the gov&#8217;t  needs to be prepared for millions of unemployed college students hanging  around the country.  It would need to also continuously change to  prevent another million people from protesting in front of TianAnMen  Square.  Because the next time it happens, I doubt the army would be  listening to the civilian commands.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, I think that  even though China is going through a really healthy period of peace and  growth, there are some looming signs of danger up ahead.  Having looked  back through its recent history, I understand the politburo&#8217;s obsession  with stability and caution, but also think that they need to continue to  change to maintain this stability.  Nobody really knows what would  happen if the Chinese economy bubble bursts.  I hope that the country  does not go back to chaos, because that would set the country back many  years.  I would recommend all of the links that I have mentioned in this  blog entry.  They are great places to start in understanding Modern  China.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, I officially quit from my job. I am currently in the middle of an one-week hiatus before starting my new job. As such, I&#8217;ve had some time to watch Ted Koppel&#8217;s piece on China (People&#8217;s republic of capitalism) and part of Paul Merton&#8217;s trip to China. I think Ted Koppel&#8217;s 4 part mini-series [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110951"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}