{"id":110948,"date":"2017-11-30T11:44:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T11:44:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:33","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:33","slug":"latest-sipri-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/latest-sipri-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Latest SIPRI report"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>In the recent times, SIPRI posted a new report regarding the military  sales in the five year period from 2005-2009.  There are some reports on  it regarding to China&#8217;s affect on the military sales in this period.<\/p>\n<p>I think <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldpoliticsreview.com\/article.aspx?id=5283\">this article<\/a> from WPR pretty much summarized what all the other articles have been saying.<\/p>\n<p>It  is quite clear that a lot of the Southeastern Asian nations are  building up their forces during the past 5 years.  That is confirmed by  the report.  However, I can&#8217;t really definitively say that all of the  countries are aiming at China.  In the case of Vietnam, it&#8217;s quite  obvious that the recent purchases for the Kilo submarines and Su-30  fighter jets were aimed at China.  I have talked about those purchases  before and have labeled them as basically a waste of money.  In the case  of Indonesia, their purchases have pretty much been to just replace  American weapons after America stopped supplying parts for those weapon  systems.  In fact, one could argue that those purchases were made in  response to Australia and Singapore rather than China.  It also explains  why China has no qualms about selling weapons to Indonesia.  In the  case of Malaysia and Singapore, I think their purchases are aimed at  each other as well as China.  In many cases, one would ask why Malaysia  needs to spend so much money on its defense.  One could say that they  are fearful of Chinese rise, but one could also say that they are just  fearful of the more modern arsenal of Singapore.  In both countries&#8217;  cases, the rise in military import is also a cyclical issue.  For  example, Singapore only needs to buy fighter jets every x number of  years.  It just happens that it made a major purchase for F-15SGs during  this 5 year period.<\/p>\n<p>It did surprise me that China remained the  largest importer of weapons during this period, because it seemed to  have been so long since they actually bought anything meaningful.  The  report also acknowledged that China have only been buying some  helicopters and engines for different platforms since 2007.  Although,  they did receive some S-300PMU2 from the Russians in 2008.  Looking  back, a large part of their purchases made in the wake of Bush&#8217;s  approval for Taiwan military sales were delivered in 2005 and 2006.  I  would expect the figures to drop quite a bit in the next 5 years, which  would cause China to loose the title of the world&#8217;s top importer of  weapons.  That would certainly be a good thing.  However, they still do  have quite a few items that would be considered foreign purchases like  the Zubr deal, Ka-28\/Mi-171 purchases, possibly another batch of AL-31FN  for J-10, more RD-93s for JF-17s, D-30KP2 for H-6Ks, diesel engines for  054 series, engines for Z-8\/Z-9\/Z-10\/Z-15.  They could also potentially  buy S-400 and Il-76\/78s from the Russians, but we will have to wait and  see.<\/p>\n<p>I also read an article where the Russians complained that  China is not buying more weapons from them.  The truth is that they just  need to get used to the fact that what they are selling is not all that  appealing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the recent times, SIPRI posted a new report regarding the military sales in the five year period from 2005-2009. There are some reports on it regarding to China&#8217;s affect on the military sales in this period. I think this article from WPR pretty much summarized what all the other articles have been saying. It [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110948"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110948\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}