{"id":110918,"date":"2017-11-30T12:09:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T12:09:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:14","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:14","slug":"thinking-outside-box","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/thinking-outside-box\/","title":{"rendered":"Thinking outside the box"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>I think I&#8217;m going to talk about something a little different today.  As  we know, China has often been listed as America&#8217;s most likely adversary  in the future.  I have often regarded military technology as the least  of America&#8217;s problems when considering China&#8217;s new found economic  strength.<\/p>\n<p>The one threat that people have always brought up as  China&#8217;s leverage against America is the vast holding of gov&#8217;t and agency  bonds that China has invested in America.  I think we&#8217;ve also heard  about their investment into Black Rock (which has been a horrible  investment) and Morgan Stanley.  And with the currency appreciation  being far more than the coupon rates, the actual rate of return is  actually in the negatives.  So, there is no question that Chinese  sovereign fund would do a lot better buying Euros, Yens, minerals and  other assets that are relatively liquid.  People have called the threat  of selling the holdings as a &#8220;financial\/money nuke&#8221; against America as  the biggest economic threat.  Some have even advocated the idea of just  voiding any of the holdings that China has in America.  I disagree with  both ideas and I will explain why.  As anyone that deals with Fixed  Income would know, there is a rating system by S&amp;P and Moody for all  bonds.  US Treasury bonds is rated as AAA, because it is thought to be  the safest of all investments.  Consider this, UK treasury is AA rated  despite also being considered risk free (I could be wrong on this).   Either way, such a huge cancellation of bonds will certainly drop the  rating of US Treasury bonds.  With such a move, any financial firm in  America that deals with bonds would have to re-engineer many models of  programs that are predicated on the assumption US Treasury is AAA rated.   A trouble in the ratings of US treasury bonds would immediately hit  the values of any currently held US treasuries.  The largest problem  probably resides in the fact that the coupon rates for US Treasury would  have to be raised (in general, yield is determined by the liquidity and  risk factor of a bond) due to the higher risk factor.    At the same  time, with the loss of one of the biggest holders, the liquidity of US  Treasury would also go down by a bit.  The net result of cancellation of  300 billion USD worth of bond would be having to offer higher coupon  rates (by maybe 50 to 100 basis point?) for the near future.   Considering how much Treasury is in circulation to cover the US national  debt (10 trillion).  having to pay 4.5 or 5% instead of 4% would  increase the value of coupon payments by over 10%.  That would be an  extra 50 to 100 billion in coupon payments per year.  Over the long run,  it&#8217;s simply a loosing proposition to make such a move.  Having covered  that, let&#8217;s look at the even bigger issue.<\/p>\n<p>I know a lot of people  think Ron Paul is crazy, but working in the financial field for the  past year and half have made me realize a lot of stuff he says is  actually valid.  I think we all know about the huge national debt and  the operating deficit of America.  A typical excuse I often hear is that  America was okay in the Regan years despite having higher operating  deficit to GDP ratio.  However, there is also the problem of paying for  the social security program and retired gov&#8217;t workers that people seem  to ignore.  If you divide that cost amongst average American families,  you&#8217;d know how much money we each owe.  So, the only way to possibly get  past this is further debasing the currency by injecting more liquidity  (printing money out of the thin air as Ron Paul calls).  What people  don&#8217;t realize is that the money supply in America is expanding at a much  faster rate than the productivity.  So, that&#8217;s why you see this huge  devaluation in the currency and the inflation in food and gas.  US  Dollar became the dominant currency after WWII because it was the only  currency tied to Gold.  All the European countries also tied their  currency to USD, so it would in effect also be tied to gold.  Let&#8217;s face  it, how do you trust a piece of paper that your gov&#8217;t forces you to use  if there is nothing behind it?  As a side note, if you collect all of  your wealth in Nickels and melt that, you would actually end up with  more money from selling the metals making up the nickels.  (yep, each  nickel is worth around 7 cent.  So the treasury is spending more money  to make less money, go figure that out)  Aside from my snide comments,  the strength of a currency is always weakened when the good\/mineral  backing the currency is weakened.  This normally happens in wartime when  the gov&#8217;t needs to deflate the money to pay for debts.  So, what  happened to the link to the gold standard?  Up until 1971, central banks  traded gold amongst themselves at the value of $35 an ounce.  Since  this was not market based (not traded amongst the public), we got a  problem where the liquidity in market far exceeded the amount of Fed  holdings of gold x $35\/ounce.  So when the French came in 1971 and  demanded gold for $35\/ounce, Nixon simply said we don&#8217;t have that much  gold.  The gold standard was dropped, so there really is nothing behind  USD at the moment.  Now, we can see from the history that many countries  rose to prominence with the usage of gold or other rare-mineral to back  their currency.  This was true in the case of Persian empire, Alexander  the Great, the Romans, British Empire and America.  So, you might have  asked by now how this has anything to do with China?  Well, the reason  is that some people are speculating a move by China toward gold  standard.  Of course, it doesn&#8217;t seem to conform with the official  policy of keeping currency lower for more exports.  We do know that  China has been a huge buyer of gold recently and that it has also become  the world&#8217;s top producer of gold (even more than South Africa).  One  might think that China is doing this as a better investment (and that&#8217;s  true), but you cannot think about what might happen if an economy as  influential as the Chinese one is linked to the gold standard.  Of note,  it&#8217;s generally believed that the official gold reserves reported by  China is vastly less than what it actually has.  Then, it would not be  too much of a surprise that Yuan might surpass USD and Euro as the  dominant currency in the future.  I don&#8217;t think one can underestimate  such financial power.<\/p>\n<p>I know this is an interesting change of  topic for this blog, but I thought it might be a good time to change the  focus a little bit and look at things from different angle.  Of course,  I&#8217;m not a financial expert by any stretch of imagination, so I&#8217;m sure a  lot of you would disagree with what I wrote.  Well, I will go back to  my regular military stuff in the near future.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think I&#8217;m going to talk about something a little different today. As we know, China has often been listed as America&#8217;s most likely adversary in the future. I have often regarded military technology as the least of America&#8217;s problems when considering China&#8217;s new found economic strength. The one threat that people have always brought [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110918"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110918"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110918\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110918"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110918"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110918"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}