{"id":110915,"date":"2017-11-30T12:15:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T12:15:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:14","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:14","slug":"china-copies-su-27","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/china-copies-su-27\/","title":{"rendered":"China copies su-27?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>There has been several articles recently critiquing J-11B.  I thought I&#8217;d take the time to debunk some of the theories on them.<\/p>\n<p>The first one comes from a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vostokmedia.com\/n609.html\">Russian newspaper<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A  copy of the Su-27 fighter has recently been assembled in China, but the  mass production is not yet started, the Vesti newspaper reports. If  China manages to launch production of the Russian jet in series they may  become a Russian competitor at third-party markets and it will be  difficult to prove the violation of copyright. <\/p>\n<p>Since 1992 Russia  has sold China 76 Su-27SK fighters and a license for production of  another 200 aircrafts that have been produced in Shenyang as J-11 planes  with the use of Russian components since 1996. <\/p>\n<p>Richard Fisher,  expert of the US Center for Security Policy said in 2003 the fully  Chinese J-11 was being elaborated in China that would require ten years.  But China finished the work faster. \u201cThe progress in jets manufacturing  technology let increase the share of China produced components and  technologies from 70-75% to more than 90%,\u201d- the Rosoboronexport  (Russian arms exporting agency) plenipotentiary in China Andrei  Plotnikov reported in the magazine Problems of the Far East. The work  over the domestic Tai Hang WS-10 jet similar to the Russian AL-31F was  completed by the AVIC I holding in 2006. <\/p>\n<p>Rosoboronexport refuses  to comment on the situation. The fact of copying Su-27 was also  rejected in the Chinese Embassy in Russia and PRC State Defense Science  and Industry Commission, the Vedomosti newspaper reports. <\/p>\n<p>Konstantin  Makiyenko from the Russian Center for Analysis of Strategies and  Technologies says that Su-27 and its variant Su-30 are the base of the  Russia\u2019s arms export. Last year\u2019s sale of fighter jets and equipment  gave about 50% of the Rosoboronexport\u2019s exports revenues. If China  manages to launch production of the Russian jet in series it will easily  push Russia from third-party markets, and it will be difficult to prove  the violation of copyright. <\/p>\n<p>China has been producing licensed  and non-licensed copies of the Soviet aircrafts for a long time. The  Chinese J-6 and J-7 fighters were designed after MiG-19 and MiG-21, H-6  bomber &#8211; after Tu-16 Badger, and Y-5, Y-7 and Y-8 &#8211; after An-2 Colt,  An-24 Coke and An-12 Cub, respectively<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think the  fear here is that China will start to produce its own flankers and  somehow overtake the Russians in the arms export market.  However, there  is no indication at the moment that China is willing to export it or  has the production capacity to produce for domestic + export needs.   I&#8217;ve read numerous questions about whether or not J-11B would be  exported to Pakistan.  Frankly, it&#8217;s not going to happen for the above  reasons.  As for the violation of copy right, I don&#8217;t think that will  ever be an issue, since I don&#8217;t think they will be exporting any.   However, the Russians will be feeling pain on this situation, because  China will no longer be paying it royalty or buying parts from it.  As  for the comment about China needing 10 years to clone flankers, it shows  a slight mis-comprehension of the entire situation.  If China needs to  wait until 2013 to clone J-11B, then why bother?  If needs 10 years to  clone a fighter, why not just design a brand new fighter?<\/p>\n<p>Anyhow, the more <a href=\"http:\/\/www.upiasiaonline.com\/Security\/2008\/02\/25\/china_imitates_russian_su-27sk_fighter\/1740\/\">interesting article<\/a> came from our friend Andrei Chang\/Pinkov.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>HONG  KONG, China,  Based on the design of the Russian Sukhoi Su-27SK  fighter, China has come up with its own domestic version, the J-11B  multi-function fighter. Three J-11B prototypes have been manufactured  since 2006. After their factory flight tests, they have been evaluated  by the People&#8217;s Liberation Army Air Force 1st Fighter Division, based in  Anshan in China&#8217;s northeast Liaoning province. <br \/>A Chinese military  industry source has confirmed that pre-production of the fighters will  begin this year. &#8220;We will not need to assemble more Su-27SKs, because it  is old technology given from Russia,&#8221; the source said.<\/p>\n<p>The J-11B  has undergone drastic changes from the original Russian design. A  source from the Chinese aerospace industry says that except for the  Russian-made engines, 90 percent of the major subsystems fitted on the  J-11B, including the radar and optical electronic systems, are made by  China. The Chinese aviation company AVIC 1 has already completed testing  the 1474 serial radar system to be deployed in the J-11B. The fighter&#8217;s  weapons will also integrate indigenous systems. <\/p>\n<p>A Chinese pilot  with more than 20 years of flight experience expressed his high opinion  of the Su-27 fighter, describing it as &#8220;very easy to fly.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>However,  as the source from the Chinese military industry points out, some of  the parts used on the Su-27SK have a very short lifespan, which has led  to a high rate of technical accidents. For instance, frequent problems  with the fighter&#8217;s infrared search and track system have restricted its  use in the regular training of combat forces. <\/p>\n<p>To investigate  this issue, the author paid a special visit to the Ural Optical and  Mechanical Complex in Ekaterinburg, Russia. A Russian source revealed  that the company had signed two contracts with a Chinese company to  supply parts for an updated IRST system, the OLS-31E. Execution of the  contract, valued at US$1 million, began in 2007.<\/p>\n<p>Research and  development of the China-made IRST system to be fitted on the J-11B  fighters is already completed. The physical appearance of this new IRST  is very close to the original Russian OLS-31E, making it appear to be an  imitation edition of the Russian system with some upgrades. In fact,  the overall performance of the J-11B is now on a par with the  Russian-edition Su-27SMK.<\/p>\n<p>The J-11B&#8217;s fire control radar system  uses mechanical scanning, integrates more functions and features a  modular design. The fighter also features substantial changes in the  fire control system and the cockpit so the J-11B will be able to fire  China&#8217;s indigenous PL-12 air-to-air missiles and a whole series of other  precision-guided weapons. The cockpit has three large color  multifunctional displays and two small color multifunctional displays. <\/p>\n<p>In  recent years, China&#8217;s pace of development in airborne equipment has  been very fast. The design of its J-10B cockpit has been quite  precocious; the rear cockpit seems to have four multifunctional color  displays and two small multifunctional displays. <\/p>\n<p>In addition,  the J-11B will be fitted with China&#8217;s indigenous strapdown inertial  navigation system, 3-axix data system, power supply system, emergency  power unit, brake system, hydraulic system, fuel system, environment  control system and molecular sieve oxygen generation systems. <\/p>\n<p>The  fact that China is producing a large proportion of the J-11B parts  domestically indicates that its demand for parts imported from Russia  will decline dramatically during the second phase of the fighter&#8217;s  production. Also, some of the subsystems and equipment are compatible  with those used in the J-10A and J-10B fighters. <\/p>\n<p>It is expected  that the J-11B&#8217;s flight control system will also be manufactured in  China. This was the leading reason why Russia could not determine  whether China would continue to produce Su-27SK fighters in the next  phase. In reality, the joint contract between Russia and China for the  Su-27SK\/J-11 development has now been virtually abandoned by the Chinese  side without any consultation with Russia.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The  first thing that jumped out to me is the part about 3 J-11B prototypes  manufactured since 2006.  Well, the truth is that J-11B was seen testing  in CFTE in all of 2006.  In fact, there were probably at least that  number before 2007.  And the second part is that we saw J-11B appearing  in the first division air base recently.  That + a host of AVIC1  articles tell us that J-11B is now joining service finally.  Also,  Pinkov often maintain this theory that J-11B uses Russian engine based  on the recent 180 engine order.  But as I&#8217;ve always maintained, that set  of engines are to service the existing fleet of flankers.  As we know,  AL-31F&#8217;s service life is really nothing to talk about, so it&#8217;s logical  that they would seek replacements at this time.  As far as we know,  J-11B is using WS-10A now and will be doing so for the future.  We&#8217;ve  had a plethora of articles recently talking about the success of the  WS-10A project including a ramp up on production (to possibly 100 in  2008), so that&#8217;s more than enough to cover J-11B + large number of J-10  for this coming year.<\/p>\n<p>The other theory that Pinkov has is that  J-11B is on par with su-27SMK and not on the same level as su-35.  I  have mentionned in past articles on why saying J-11B is inferior to  su-35 is a really bad way to look at things.  The reality is that  something like su-27SMK simply cannot match the requirement of PLAAF,  when the much cheaper J-10 is far superior in air combat than it.  In  terms of radar, avionics, T\/W ratio, ability to fire Chinese weapons,  su-27SMK simply doesn&#8217;t match up with J-11B.  And with the results  coming out regarding J-10 vs MKK, I really don&#8217;t think having something  of the same level as MKK would impress any of the top brass in PLAAF.<\/p>\n<p>Also  on su-35, I really hope that nobody in PLAAF is delusional enough to  think that it has a chance against F-22.  If something like that starts  to get inducted in 2012 (and that&#8217;s a very optimistic estimation), PLAAF  will simply be overpaying for another fighter that cannot match up  against F-22\/35 in a possible confrontation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There has been several articles recently critiquing J-11B. I thought I&#8217;d take the time to debunk some of the theories on them. The first one comes from a Russian newspaper A copy of the Su-27 fighter has recently been assembled in China, but the mass production is not yet started, the Vesti newspaper reports. If [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110915"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110915"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110915\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}