{"id":110909,"date":"2017-11-30T12:30:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T12:30:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:10","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:10","slug":"more-on-054a","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/more-on-054a\/","title":{"rendered":"More on 054A"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>SR-64 is one of the less known, but extremely important sensors on PLAN  ships.  We see it on 052B\/C, 051C, 054A, 071 and 054.  Although no  formal information is out on SR-64, it is generally believed to have the  scan rate and computational power needed to track multiple low flying  supersonic anti-ship missiles.  A commonly flown figure is that it has a  detection range of 12 KM against sea-skimmers.  There is also the more  improbable figure of 100 km posted by Koxinga of CDF.  Either way, it&#8217;s  location, scan rate, radar band all point to its role as tracking  sea-skimmers.  Many people have suspected that it has the same role as  the radar that looks like Bandstand on Kashtan equipped ships.  However,  we&#8217;ve seen SR-64 on 071 and 054, which do not have Type 730 CIWS.  It&#8217;s  clear that track or plot data from SR-64 goes into the combat system  rather than straight into Type 730 CIWS.  At the moment, it&#8217;s a little  unclear which sensor provides the mid-course update for the missiles.   It could be the light-bulb datalink, which provides mid-course update  for Anti-ship missiles, but maybe also provide update for HH-16.  The  Sea Eagle search radar, with its 12 rpm scan rate, does not seem to have  the necessary refresh rate to provide updates for HH-16.  SR-64 may  have the additional responsibility of mid-course update on top of  tracking sea-skimmers and surface targets.  Or, some other less known  sensor may be providing the mid-course updates.  If continuous  illuminations of FCRs is required, only a maximum of 4 targets can be  engaged with 8 missiles.  Since only terminal illuminations is required,  054A can theoretically engage against 8 targets simultaneously  (although much less in actual practice) with the number of missiles  limited by the number that can be launched during that time frame and  also be limited by the number that the system can provide mid-course  update for.  Either way, we can conclude that 054A at the current time  has much better multi-target engagement capabilities than prior PLAN  ships with HH-16.<\/p>\n<p>The often overlooked part of 054A&#8217;s air defense  are Type 730 CIWS and AK-176M.  I wrote several posts on SDF in the  past on Type 730&#8217;s capabilities.  Many people believe that Type 730 is  inferior to Kashtan, because it does not have the gun+missile  combination of Kashtan.  In reality, PLAN was never too impressed by the  performance of Kashtan in test trials.  In terms of sensors, it has its  own FCR + E\/O tracker like Goalkeeper, Palma and Kashtan.  And I think  we can safely assume that it is integrated into the air defense system  with all the sensors.  The help of SR-64 would be extremely vital for  Type 730.  Especially in the case of 052C, where Type 730 CIWS pretty  much has to deal with all sea-skimmers below 10 m, SR-64&#8217;s main data  recipient will probably be Type 730 CIWS.  Although, with its own high  frequency FCR and E\/O tracker, it can track and shoot down targets  independently.  At this moment, I do not have the figures on Type 730  CIWS.  Although, it is believed that Type 730 CIWS can encounter  multiple supersonic missiles like Goalkeeper.  I&#8217;ve read an article that  has detailed account of Goalkeeper&#8217;s performance versus multiple  targets, but the only place online that seems to have this is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.navweaps.com\/Weapons\/WNNeth_30mm_Goalkeeper.htm\">this link<\/a>.  A good description is as follows:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This  system can track up to thirty targets, engaging the four most urgent.   It will minimize the salvo length to engage as many targets as possible  and is thought to be able to deal with two pairs of sea-skimming  missiles as little as five seconds apart.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It is  generally believed that Type 730 CIWS was required to at least match, if  not exceed, the performance of Goalkeeper.  Which means, with the help  of on-board sensors, each Type 730 CIWS can handle 4 or 5 concurrent sea  skimmers.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the most overlooked part of 054A&#8217;s air  defense is probably AK-176M.  The one overly hyped main gun that  everyone seems to know about is the Oto Melara super rapid 76 mm gun.   It seems like China evaluated Oto 76 with French 100 mm pre-TianAnMen  Square and decided at that time, the 100 mm was better.  Later, they  evaluated between AK-176 and French 100 mm and preferred AK-176.  To  bring out some of the reasonings used (copied off my original SDF  translations):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>they originally compared oto 76 with the 100 mm naval gun to see which one was better to import and they picked 100 mm one and <span class=\"highlight\">AK-176<\/span> turned out to have even more advantages.<\/li>\n<li>at  that time, OTO-76 did not have the automation level of 100 mm gun. at  that time, it was also easier for China to develop guided munitions for  100 mm. And 054&#8217;s 100 mm was simplified by over 40% in sensors, but it&#8217;s  high speed shooting reliability is not good<\/li>\n<li>Firing rate and  muzzle velocity are extremely important for China due to the requirement  to counter anti-ship missiles. That&#8217;s where AK-176M has serious  advantage.<\/li>\n<li>China started to develop 76 mm around 92 to 94.  After improving on <span class=\"highlight\">AK-176<\/span>, it did not bother to look at the super rapid OTO-76.  The muzzle velocity of OTO-76 is 920 m\/s, whereas <span class=\"highlight\">AK-176<\/span> is 980 m\/s.  Over 5000 m, the flight time is 2.5 second shorter.  Also <span class=\"highlight\">AK-176<\/span> fires off 10 more rounds.<\/li>\n<li>After china improved on AK-176M, it is much faster at replacing rounds than OTO-76.  Auto-reload is important, the improve <span class=\"highlight\">AK-176<\/span> can achieve reload in no time, whereas OTO-76 is behind here<\/li>\n<li>You  can always improve on sensors\/automation (newer electronics) and  projectile guidance (use newer rounds), but muzzle velocity, firing rate  and reloading speed are extremely important too.<\/li>\n<li>Also, the  figure given for accuracy is only for single round 1000 m. When firing  60 to 90 consecutive shots, there is no difference. Also, AK-176&#8217;s  munition is better than OTO, as it can better defend against multiple  targets in high threat environment.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>I can&#8217;t testify to every  statement made there, but most of it did make sense to me when I first  read it.  Either way, China put AK-176M and a brand new FCR (different  from the 100 mm&#8217;s FCR) on 054A and 071, so it must be quite impressed  with their performance.<\/p>\n<p>Theoretically speaking, each 054A has the  capability to track many targets at different flight profiles (even the  fast + low ones) and also the capability to engage many of them at the  same time.  It&#8217;s clearly quite an advanced air defense frigate (although  not as sophisticated as those European &#8220;AAW frigate&#8221;).  With the next  set of 054 sensors currently on 891 undergoing tests, it would be  interesting to see how much more capable the next batch of 054A will be.   I&#8217;m looking forward to update more on Type 730 CIWS and 054A sensors +  other parts like it ASuW and ASW capability in a future post.  Until  then, I hope this gives a good initial overview on 054A&#8217;s air defense  capabilities.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SR-64 is one of the less known, but extremely important sensors on PLAN ships. We see it on 052B\/C, 051C, 054A, 071 and 054. Although no formal information is out on SR-64, it is generally believed to have the scan rate and computational power needed to track multiple low flying supersonic anti-ship missiles. A commonly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110909"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}