{"id":110893,"date":"2017-11-30T12:58:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T12:58:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:05:00","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:05:00","slug":"the-gathering-storm-russia-edition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/the-gathering-storm-russia-edition\/","title":{"rendered":"The Gathering Storm (Russia Edition)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>This post is being written late Sunday afternoon, about three hours  before the second presidential debate from Washington University in St.  Louis.&nbsp; At this point, we (officially) don&#8217;t know what questions will be  posed to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump by moderators Anderson Cooper  of CNN and Martha Raddatz of ABC, along with members of the studio  audience.&nbsp; But you don&#8217;t need to be a political pundit to discern that  many of tonight&#8217;s queries will focus on Mr. Trump and his contemptible  remarks about women, made to Billy Bush (then a co-host of &#8220;Access  Hollywood&#8221;) almost 12 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, we&#8217;ll be greatly surprised if Mr. Cooper, Ms. Raddatz and  the audience questioners spend much time outside the realm of the  salacious, and actually inquire about issues that actually matter to the  nation&#8217;s security.&nbsp; And we&#8217;re not referring to the border, immigration  or other issues that are clearly security-related, and have dominated  much of the campaign season.&nbsp; Instead, it&#8217;s time for a discussion on  equally-pressing matters that are reaching the crisis level at hot spots  around the globe. <\/p>\n<p>The logical starting point is Russia.&nbsp; As John Schindler recently noted in the <a href=\"http:\/\/observer.com\/2016\/10\/putins-activation-of-iskander-m-ballistic-missile-is-a-message-to-obama\/\"><i>New York Observer<\/i><\/a>,  we are facing a likely nuclear standoff with Russia in the Baltics  region, probably before President Obama leaves office.&nbsp; It&#8217;s no secret  that Vladimir Putin has no regard for the American leader, and he is  determined to inflict another humiliation on Mr. Obama before he leaves  office.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">It\u2019s long been obvious that Vladimir Putin and his inner  circle view Barack Obama with utter contempt. To the hard men in Moscow,  who got their schooling in the KGB, our diffident, wordy Ivy League  lawyer president is a weakling\u2014almost a caricature of everything they  despise about the postmodern West.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Here the Kremlin mirrors most Russians, who find Obama a  puzzling and contemptible man. This is nothing new. I\u2019ve heard  remarkable put-downs of our commander-in-chief for years, going back to  2008, even from the mouths of highly educated Russians. Their comments  are invariably earthy, insulting, and nowhere near politically correct.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">It\u2019s therefore no surprise that Russians view Obama with  contempt\u2014and so does their leader. As our president winds up his second  term and prepares to move out of the White House, the Kremlin simply  isn\u2019t bothering to hide that contempt any longer, even in high-level  diplomacy, where a modicum of tact is expected.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">Of  course, Mr. Obama hasn&#8217;t exactly helped his cause by ignoring Russian  provocations and refusing to make tough choices&#8211;and stand behind them.&nbsp;  That non-existent &#8220;red line&#8221; in Syria was followed by Putin making (and  keeping) his own vow to support long-time ally Bashir Assad.&nbsp; Pentagon  analysts claim Russia&#8217;s military efforts in Syria have been far from a  victory, but that misses the central point.&nbsp; Putin didn&#8217;t go to war to  defeat ISIS; his primary objective was to prevent Assad&#8217;s military  collapse and weaken the U.S.-backed rebel groups trying to depose his  regime.&nbsp; By those metrics, the deployment has been successful.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">The  Russian President has derived additional benefits by showing off his  modernized arsenal, and vowing to challenge the U.S. and NATO.&nbsp; In  recent months, Moscow has deployed two advanced surface-to-air missile  systems to Syria, to protect its forces and Assad&#8217;s troops from western  air attack.&nbsp; Shortly after the second system (the SA-23) arrived, a  senior Russian military official vowed to attack U.S. aircraft over  Syria, if they pose a military threat.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">And,  upping the ante even more, Putin is dispatching a carrier battle group  to the eastern Mediterranean, extending his air defense network well  beyond the Syrian coast, and posing a potential threat to U.S. naval  forces in the region. Defense analysts have speculated that any American  attack against Assad would likely be a cruise missile strike, mounted  by ships and submarines assigned to the 6th Fleet.&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">Mr.  Putin is also on the move in Europe.&nbsp; Elite airborne units&#8211;potentially  useful in operations against Ukraine and the Baltics&#8211;have been training  west of Moscow, near Russia&#8217;s borders with Poland, Latvia and Estonia.&nbsp;  In some instances, airborne elements have deployed out of garrison with  a full complement of equipment, rehearsing mobility skills that would  be useful during future operations.&nbsp; The most recent airborne drills  come on the heels of a command post exercise involving many of the same  units; it&#8217;s a textbook example of the building-block approach favored by  the Russian Army (and other military elements around the world).&nbsp; Start  off with the command units, then broaden the exercise to include troops  in the field. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">But  the airborne drills aren&#8217;t the most disturbing aspect of Russia&#8217;s  on-going military activity.&nbsp; Concurrently, Moscow is holding a massive  civil defense drill, involving more than 20,000 Radiological, Chemical  and Biological defense troops and other first responders, along with  upwards of 40 million civilians.&nbsp; The exercise scenario is reportedly  based on a limited nuclear conflict between Russia and the west, a  concept Russia has embraced in military doctrine developed over the last  20 years.&nbsp; With the loss of massive conventional forces that were  disbanded with the fall of the USSR, Russian doctrine is now built  around the potential first use of nuclear weapons, and employment of  defensive measures to protect key military, economic and leadership  assets. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">While  this doesn&#8217;t mean a nuclear conflict is Miminent, there are other,  troubling signs that should give everyone pause.&nbsp; In recent days, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defencetalk.com\/russia-deploys-nuclear-capable-missiles-on-nato-doorstep-68335\/\">Moscow has deployed SS-26 Iskander ballistic missiles to Kaliningrad<\/a>,  the Russian enclave that lies between Poland and Lithuania.&nbsp; The SS-26  has a maximum range of 435 NM; it is extremely accurate and (as you  might have guessed) it can carry a nuclear warhead.&nbsp; From launch  positions in Kaliningrad, the Iskander can strike targets throughout  Poland and even reach Berlin&#8211;a fact that isn&#8217;t lost on our increasingly  nervous NATO allies.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">This  is not the first time the SS-26 has been dispatched to Kaliningrad, but  given the current tensions, Putin is using the deployment to send a very  clear signal.&nbsp; With Obama in the White House, he views NATO as  rudderless and weak, and Putin ratchet up the pressure to further divide  the alliance during the run-up to our presidential election. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">So far, the response from Washington has been muted, to say the least.&nbsp; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thesun.co.uk\/news\/1921458\/us-army-chief-mark-milley-fires-terrifying-threat-to-russia-over-syria-and-warns-well-beat-you-any-where-any-time\/\">There was a blistering comment from the Army Chief of Staff, General Mark Milley,<\/a> who warned &#8220;those who wish to do us harm&#8221; that the U.S. military, &#8220;despite all our challenges,&#8221; will <\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">stop  you, and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten  before.&#8221;&nbsp; But Milley&#8217;s superiors, including the Commander-in-Chief, have  been remarkably silent in the face of Russia&#8217;s latest provocations. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">Maybe  it&#8217;s the long holiday weekend (our hard-working federal bureaucrats are  enjoying a three-day break for Columbus Day).&nbsp; Or perhaps the  president&#8217;s political advisers counseled against a high-level statement  ahead of last night&#8217;s debate.&nbsp; Or maybe our latest bluster over Syria  will go the same way as that infamous red line of a few years ago.&nbsp; Put  another way: we don&#8217;t have anything beyond rhetoric, and Mr. Obama  leaves office in less than 100 days.&nbsp; He is quite happy to play out the  string and leave the Baltics as yet another mess for his successor. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">But he  may not get off that easy.&nbsp; Putin is quite aware of how America is now  perceived on the world stage and he understands the potential impact of  one last humiliation before Obama exits the White House.&nbsp; A Baltic  version of the Cuban missile crisis?&nbsp; Don&#8217;t discount that possibility.<\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">***<\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">ADDENDUM:&nbsp;  As predicted, the Baltics didn&#8217;t make the cut for questions in last  night&#8217;s presidential debate.&nbsp; Russia was mentioned, in the context of  hacking and trying to influence the U.S. election next month.&nbsp; But the  looming crisis on NATO&#8217;s eastern flank was conveniently ignored&#8211;rather  curious considering that one of the moderators, ABC&#8217;s Martha Raddatz,  has reported extensively on national security issues.&nbsp; Then again, Ms.  Raddatz (along with CNN&#8217;s Cooper) seemed to abandon at pretense at  impartiality, interrupting Trump five times more often than they  challenged Clinton.&nbsp; Against that backdrop, it&#8217;s no surprise that  Russian moves in the Baltics never entered the debate. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This post is being written late Sunday afternoon, about three hours before the second presidential debate from Washington University in St. Louis.&nbsp; At this point, we (officially) don&#8217;t know what questions will be posed to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump by moderators Anderson Cooper of CNN and Martha Raddatz of ABC, along with members of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110893"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}