{"id":110813,"date":"2017-11-30T13:36:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T13:36:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:04:19","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:04:19","slug":"does-mrs-clinton-have-another-missing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/does-mrs-clinton-have-another-missing\/","title":{"rendered":"Does Mrs. Clinton Have Another Missing Form, Redux"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Hillary Clinton&#8217;s e-mail scandal&#8211;like a bad computer virus&#8211;simply won&#8217;t go away. <\/p>\n<p>The latest revelation merely confirms what many have suspected from the  start: Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s private e-mail network&#8211;clearly designed to evade  government archiving and accountability rules&#8211;was used to send  classified information.&nbsp; According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/investigation-sought-into-hillary-clintons-emails-1437714369\"><i>The Wall Street Journal<\/i><\/a>,  the Intelligence Community Inspector General has found at least four  e-mails that contained SECRET-level material when they were sent, and  that information remains classified to this day.<\/p>\n<p>As the <i>Journal<\/i> reports, the IG has reviewed only about 40 of the  30,000 e-mails that have been turned over by the former Secretary of  State.&nbsp; If that sample is any indication, then Mrs. Clinton and her  associates may have sent literally thousands of messages containing  classified information over her private e-mail network that was far less  secure than NIPRNET, the government network that was created to  transmit sensitive, but unclassified information.&nbsp; Appropriately enough,  NIPRNET is now referred to as the Sensitive but Unclassified IP Data  Network, reflecting its intended use. <\/p>\n<p>The government also has SIPRNET, a separate network that can handle  SECRET information (the service was later renamed the Secret IP Service)  and JWICS, which transmits information at the Top Secret\/Sensitive  Compartmentalized Information (TS\/SCI) level.&nbsp; As a cabinet secretary,  Mrs. Clinton had access to information from all three networks, along  with thousands of other government employees with the proper security  clearance and a need-to-know. <\/p>\n<p>But this resurrects a question <a href=\"http:\/\/formerspook.blogspot.com\/2015\/03\/hillarys-e-mail-problem.html\">we first posed back in March<\/a>:  how was Secretary Clinton accessing information from these systems?&nbsp;  Normally, someone cleared to the TS\/SCI level (and beyond) would have a  minimum of three government e-mail accounts, one for NIPRNET, one for  SIPRNET and one for JWICS (we&#8217;ll stick with the old designations, since  most users still use them in referring to the networks).&nbsp; Officially,  there is no record of Mrs. Clinton ever establishing such accounts  during her tenure at Foggy Bottom, but then again, her friends in the  press corps haven&#8217;t exactly pressed the issue.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, a FOIA request to the Special Security Office (SSO) at State  could, potentially, clear up much of the mystery.&nbsp; As a sitting U.S.  Senator, Mrs. Clinton had a TS\/SCI clearance when she arrived at the  department.&nbsp; Records from the SSO would reflect her &#8220;transfer-in-status&#8221;  (a term used to describe a cleared individual moving from one position  to another), along with her signature on the Standard Form 312, the  Classified Information Non-Disclosure Agreement. <\/p>\n<p>We detailed <a href=\"http:\/\/formerspook.blogspot.com\/2015\/03\/does-mrs-clinton-have-another-missing.html\">the importance of that document four months ago<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8230;It&#8217;s a document signed by anyone who has been granted access to  classified information, including government employees, military  personnel, political appointees, elected officials (and anyone else with  a security clearance).&nbsp; By signing the SF 312, individuals promise to  never divulge classified information to other organizations, groups or  individuals without determining they have a need for the information and  the required clearance. <\/p>\n<p>Additionally, signatories of the SF-312 acknowledge acknowledge that the  &#8220;unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling  of classified information by me could cause damage or irreparable  injury to the United States or could be used to advantage by a foreign  nation.&#8221;&nbsp; They also enter into a binding agreement that requires them to  return all classified information upon leaving their position, as  detailed in various federal statutes:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">&#8220;I shall return all classified  materials which have, or may come into my possession or for which I am  responsible because of such access: (a) upon demand by an authorized  representative of the United States Government; (b) upon the conclusion  of my employment or other relationship with the Department or Agency  that last granted me a security clearance or that provided me access to  classified information; or (c) upon the conclusion of my employment or  other relationship that requires access to classified information. If I  do not return such materials upon request, I understand that this may be  a violation of sections 793 and\/or 1924, title 18, United States Code, a  United States criminal law.&#8221; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">[snip]<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">But there&#8217;s one more interesting portion of the Standard Form 312, found  in the last section of the document, the Security Debriefing  Acknowledgement:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">&#8220;I reaffirm that the provisions of the  espionage laws, other federal criminal laws and executive orders  applicable to the safeguarding of classified information have been made  available to me; that I have returned all classified information in my  custody; that I will not communicate or transmit classified information  to any unauthorized person or organization; that I will promptly report  to the Federal Bureau of Investigation any attempt by an unauthorized  person to solicit classified information, and that I (have) (have not)  (strike out inappropriate word or words) received a security  debriefing.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><span>That  final paragraph is important, since employees must acknowledge receipt  (or non-receipt) of a security briefing, covering all the rules on  non-disclosure and return of classified material listed on the form.&nbsp;  Signing the SF-312 is one of the last acts before a person leaves a job  that requires access to classified information.&nbsp; Before departing the  State Department for the last time, Mrs. Clinton should have received  the required security briefing and it should be documented on the  SF-312&#8211;the same form she also signed upon entering the job. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><span>The  SF-312 isn&#8217;t some rare or optional document.&nbsp; It is part of security  clearance folder for anyone who has ever had access to classified  information, including former political leaders and cabinet officials.&nbsp;  And, the requirements for protecting and returning classified  information are clearly germaine to the current Clinton controversy.&nbsp;  So, where is Hillary&#8217;s Clinton&#8217;s SF-312?&nbsp; There should be a copy on file  at the State Department&#8217;s Special Security Office (SSO), and readily  accessible by department officials.&#8221;<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><span><span>As  we noted in March, Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s actions clearly put her at odds with  the legal requirements outlined on the SF-312.&nbsp; Obviously, she had  access to highly classified information&#8211;including some of the &#8220;crown  jewels&#8221; of U.S. intelligence; what remains unclear is whether she  accessed the information directly (via her own SIPRNET or JWICS  account), or read it in the cables, summaries and analyses that  routinely crossed her desk. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><span><span>And,  according to the Intelligence Community IG, some of that information  made its way onto her private e-mail network and may have shared it with  at least one individual who did not have an active security clearance.&nbsp;  We refer to Sidney Blumenthal, the long-time Clinton confidante who was  denied a State Department position by the Obama White House.&nbsp; E-mails  previously released show that Mr. Blumenthal routinely provided  intelligence assessments to Secretary Clinton, using his own contacts.&nbsp;  The WSJ report did not specify in Blumenthal was among the recipients of  e-mails containing classified material. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><span><span>Meanwhile,  The New York Times is reporting that the Intelligence Community IG  (along with his counter-part at the State Department) have asked the  Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether  sensitive information was &#8220;mishandled&#8221; in connection with Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s  private e-mail account.&nbsp; So far, Justice has not determined if it will  follow that recommendation. &nbsp;<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><span><span>This  is hardly good news for the Clinton campaign, but don&#8217;t hold your  breath waiting for an indictment. Lest we forget, Hillary was Mr.  Obama&#8217;s Secretary of State when she elected to flaunt federal rules on  the archiving and retention of official documents&#8211;and for good measure,  laws governing the handling and transmission of classified  information.&nbsp; Some of those e-mails went to other members of the Obama  Administration, which clearly doesn&#8217;t want a full accounting of how much  classified data was disseminated through the clintonemail.com domain.&nbsp;  So, expect the request for a criminal probe to get the slow-roll  treatment; the e-mail inquiry will be placed on the &#8220;to-do&#8221; list, just  behind a full accounting of the Lois Lerner\/IRS scandal. &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hillary Clinton&#8217;s e-mail scandal&#8211;like a bad computer virus&#8211;simply won&#8217;t go away. The latest revelation merely confirms what many have suspected from the start: Mrs. Clinton&#8217;s private e-mail network&#8211;clearly designed to evade government archiving and accountability rules&#8211;was used to send classified information.&nbsp; According to The Wall Street Journal, the Intelligence Community Inspector General has found at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110813"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110813"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110813\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}