{"id":110794,"date":"2017-11-30T13:45:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T13:45:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:04:06","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:04:06","slug":"body-count","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/body-count\/","title":{"rendered":"Body Count"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>While reports from the war zone run contrary to the spin in Washington,  members of the Obama Administration are quite happy to tell you: we are  winning the war against ISIS.&nbsp; And they say it with a straight face. &nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Well, perhaps &#8220;winning&#8221; is too strong a word, particularly in light of  the terrorist army&#8217;s recent capture of Ramidi and other key locations in  Iraq and Syria.&nbsp; Maybe the preferred term is &#8220;making progress,&#8221; despite  the fact that usually-friendly media outlets are even challenging that  vague assertion. <\/p>\n<p>Consider <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nbcnews.com\/storyline\/isis-terror\/u-s-claim-10-000-isis-dead-believable-n369181\">this story<\/a>,  which appeared today at NBC News.com.&nbsp; And it raises a legitimate  question: amid claims&#8211;from a senior U.S. official&#8211;that 10,000 ISIS  fighters have been killed in Iraq and Syria, are those numbers  believable? (More on that in a bit).<\/p>\n<p>But first the back story; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/news\/middle-east\/1.659384\">the official estimating the number of dead terrorists<\/a> was Deputy Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, who participated in a  meeting of the anti-ISIS coalition in Paris.&nbsp; Mr. Blinken was filling in  for his boss, Secretary of State John Kerry, who is recovering from a  broken leg, suffered in a bicycle crash over the weekend.&nbsp; So, the &#8220;body  count&#8221; can&#8217;t be blamed on some low-level staffer at the NSC or the  Pentagon.<\/p>\n<p>And, Mr. Blinken simply didn&#8217;t pull the number out of thin area.&nbsp; His  apparent source was a Pentagon analysis prepared last year.&nbsp; But this is  where the math gets a little fuzzy; military intelligence analysts  arrived at the ISIS body count by calculating enemy deaths in Iraq and  Syria, both in ground combat and from coalition air strikes.&nbsp; Needless  to say, the estimate is far from precise, since we don&#8217;t have someone on  the ground (in most locations) who can provide the exact number of ISIS  fighters who have been killed in recent months. <\/p>\n<p>The U.S. military did not plan to release its tally, knowing the number  is suspect.&nbsp; Additionally, Pentagon officials learned a long time ago  that casualty counts are a poor tool for measuring progress in a  conflict.&nbsp; During the Vietnam War, public affairs officers provided  weekly summaries of the number of enemy troops who died in battle, as a  yardstick of progress.&nbsp; Unfortunately, those body totals didn&#8217;t always  square with reality on the ground.&nbsp; Our troops killed hundreds of North  Vietnamese and Viet Cong troops every week, but the enemy kept coming.&nbsp;  Casualties didn&#8217;t matter to the enemy, who was willing to fight until  the war was won. <\/p>\n<p>Fifty years later, ISIS maintains a similar mindset and there is no  shortage of volunteers willing to give their lives for the cause.&nbsp; The  CIA recently estimated that the terror group has been able to maintain a  fighting force of 20-30,000 men through a very aggressive recruiting  campaign that has brought more jihadis to the fight.&nbsp; So, whatever their  losses, ISIS is more than capable of replacing them.<\/p>\n<p>Why use such a flawed metric to demonstrate &#8220;success&#8221; on the  battlefield?&nbsp; It would be easy to claim that Mr. Blinken simply made a  mistake, but his claims appear to be part of a wider strategy by Team  Obama.&nbsp; Six months ago, the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Stuart Jones, told  an Arab TV channel that 6,000 enemy fighters had been killed.&nbsp; But  then-Pentagon spokesman Admiral John Kirby told reporters there was no  official body count, and it would be &#8220;wrong&#8221; to claim there was such a  tally. <\/p>\n<p>Some of the experts questioned by NBC expressed serious doubts about the ISIS body count:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Laith Alkhouri, of security consulting firm and NBC News partner  Flashpoint Intelligence, said he didn&#8217;t believe Blinken&#8217;s number. The  U.S. government hasn&#8217;t shared any underlying evidence, such as  incremental reports of ISIS deaths, to back it up, he said.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">                                                    <\/span><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"> Flashpoint&#8217;s own monitoring of jihadist reports  doesn&#8217;t reflect such a body count, Alkhouri said, also noting that the  number doesn&#8217;t reflect ISIS&#8217; recent string of military victories.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">                                                    <\/span><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"> &#8220;The reality on the ground is that ISIS is capturing territory, not losing ground,&#8221; he said.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">Why  make such a dubious claim?&nbsp; Mr. Obama and his advisers are anxious to  show &#8220;progress&#8221; in the battle against ISIS, and it&#8217;s hard to prove that  case when the terrorists are on the march.&nbsp; So, someone in the  administration spin machine (who is clearly not a student of history)  decided to fall back on the body count metric.&nbsp; But that strategy is  dubious, at best.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">Decades  ago, as public support for the Vietnam War began to fade, CBS anchorman  Walter Cronkite made a famous trip to the war zone.&nbsp; His subsequent  documentary reportedly convinced President Johnson that he had &#8220;lost  middle America,&#8221; and had no chance of winning the war&#8211;or re-election.&nbsp;  This time around, the narrative is different; the NBC report casts grave  doubts on the administration&#8217;s claims and it&nbsp;reflects the new reality  of today&#8217;s relationship between the media and political leaders.&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">In  1968, the media was viewed as a conduit to the public; today, the press  is an institution unto itself, still capable of&nbsp;exerting great influence  on governmental decision-making.&nbsp; This is particularly true in a White  House that has relied on a sycophantic media as a pillar of its popular  support.&nbsp; Somewhere in the West Wing, they must be wondering if they&#8217;ve  &#8220;lost&#8221; NBC News and what can be done to bring them back on the  reservation.&nbsp;&nbsp; Sadly, it won&#8217;t take much (in terms of persuasion) to  bring&nbsp;NBC back in line.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/span> <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While reports from the war zone run contrary to the spin in Washington, members of the Obama Administration are quite happy to tell you: we are winning the war against ISIS.&nbsp; And they say it with a straight face. &nbsp; Well, perhaps &#8220;winning&#8221; is too strong a word, particularly in light of the terrorist army&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110794"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110794"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110794\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}