{"id":110782,"date":"2017-11-30T14:18:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T14:18:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:03:59","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:03:59","slug":"outgunned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/outgunned\/","title":{"rendered":"Outgunned"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-MJuMWDSnDtw\/VUp0mwmDh8I\/AAAAAAAAA-k\/Z6vIRV5rTpE\/s1600\/THAAD%2Blauncher.jpg\" style=\"clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"300\" height=\"230\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/11\/thaad2blauncher.jpg\" class=\"wp-image-110783\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p><i>A Theater High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) launcher.&nbsp; North Korea&#8217;s  growing missile threat has led some analysts to suggest a THAAD  deployment on the Korean peninsula (U.S. Army photo) <\/i><\/p>\n<p>As Stalin was fond of saying, &#8220;quantity has a quality all its own,&#8221; and that certainly applies to missile defense.<\/p>\n<p>One of the more effective counter-measures against advanced defensive  systems like the Patriot, Aegis and S-300 is old-fashioned brute force:  simply launch more missiles than the interceptors can handle.&nbsp; As a  war-gamer for the Air Force in the late 90s, I recall some simulations  of a PRC missile attack against Taiwan; the more optimistic estimates  predicted that Taipei&#8217;s Patriot batteries would last for a few minutes  before running out of missiles and becoming targets for the next wave of  CSS-6 and CSS-7s from the mainland. <\/p>\n<p>The picture may be almost as grim in Korea.&nbsp; Former Pentagon analyst Van Jackson tells <i><a href=\"http:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2015\/05\/save-our-seoul-south-korea-needs-thaad-asap-for-missile-defense\/?utm_source=Breaking+Defense&amp;utm_campaign=222a8a1fda-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_4368933672-222a8a1fda-408487809\">Breaking Defense<\/a> <\/i>the  current array of American and South Korean Patriot batteries,  supplemented by Aegis-equipped ships of U.S. and ROK navies, couldn&#8217;t  defend our own bases, let alone major population centers like Seoul. <\/p>\n<p>Once again, it&#8217;s a matter of quantity.&nbsp; North Korea has as many as 1,000  missiles available for use against targets below the 38th parallel and  in Japan.&nbsp; While many are older Scud-series missiles, they could (when  launched in massive volleys) overwhelm missile defenses on the  peninsula. <\/p>\n<p>Dr. Jackson and other experts believe the U.S. should deploy a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Terminal_High_Altitude_Area_Defense\">Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)<\/a> battery to South Korea.&nbsp; With a more powerful radar (and longer-range  interceptor missiles), THAAD could play a useful role in negating  Pyongyang&#8217;s more capable missiles, at greater distances.&nbsp; And, because  of China&#8217;s heavy-handed lobbying against a THAAD deployment, Seoul is  growing more receptive to the idea. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Koreans are much more favorable about THAAD,\u201d [Jackson] said, \u201cthan  they were six months ago.\u201d That\u2019s not because of any brilliant strategy  on America\u2019s part \u2014 the US hasn\u2019t even made an official proposal to  deploy new missile defense, he said \u2014 but because of \u201cheavy-handedness\u201d  on the part of the Chinese. In a twist that must <a href=\"http:\/\/breakingdefense.com\/2013\/12\/china-can-win-big-in-the-pacific-by-backing-down-edward-luttwak\/\">make Sun Tzu spin in his grave<\/a>, China has lobbied South Korea so hard <i>against<\/i> the THAAD deployment that Koreans, as a backlash, are now more <i>in favor<\/i> of it.<\/p>\n<p>Even so, said Jackson, \u201cI wouldn\u2019t anticipate South Korea asking for a  deployment of THAAD without some kind of precipitating event, [such as]  maybe a fourth nuclear test\u201d by the North. Of course, if there\u2019s one  thing we can count on in the unpredictable peninsula, it\u2019s that  Pyongyang will do <i>something<\/i> provocative, given time.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, even Beijing has voiced recent concerns about the North Korean  threat, but they want the U.S. to use diplomacy to deal with the  problem, rather than a military build-up.&nbsp; The PRC has even claimed the  THAAD radar could be used to &#8220;spy&#8221; on their activities, a charge that is  downright laughable.&nbsp; THAAD is a purely defensive system, but that  doesn&#8217;t stop the Chinese from campaigning against additional deployments  in the Far East. <\/p>\n<p>Clearly, PLA leadership is concerned that THAAD technology will  eventually make its way into the defense forces of South Korea, Taiwan  and Japan, following the examples of Patriot and Aegis.&nbsp; With ballistic  missiles forming a key element of its regional strategy, Beijing will  clearly reject any moves that would lead to better missile defense  capabilities among its neighbors. <\/p>\n<p>For now, it looks like China will get its way.&nbsp; The Obama Administration  goes out of its way to avoid antagonizing our adversaries, and the PRC  certainly falls in that category.&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/lockheedmartin.com\/us\/news\/features\/2015\/mfc-030615-thaad-battery-deploys-guam.html\">While the White House approved a THAAD deployment to Guam in 2013<\/a>&#8211;and  that presence has been sustained for more than two years&#8211;there are no  plans to send other batteries to South Korea.&nbsp; That raises a couple of  interesting scenarios, namely how Washington would respond to a fourth  nuclear test by Pyongyang, or the first launch of a BM-25 Musudan, or  the KN-08, which is capable of reaching targets on the U.S. West Coast. <\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also the matter of limited assets and military budgets in an era  of sequestration.&nbsp; Earlier this year, senior Army officials warned that  air defense artillery units are facing the same problems caused limited  funding and frequent deployments.&nbsp; While ADA elements don&#8217;t rotate to  Afghanistan, they are currently supporting a number of deployments  around the globe.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this year, the Deputy Commander of the Army&#8217;s 32nd Air and  Missile Defense Command reported that, on any given day, roughly half of  the nation&#8217;s Patriot batteries are deployed outside the CONUS.&nbsp; The  Army Chief of Staff, General Ray Odinero has stated that the current  pace of missile defense deployments is &#8220;unsustainable.&#8221;&nbsp; Equipment is  wearing out, highly-trained soldiers are getting out and needed upgrades  are being delayed by the current ops tempo. <\/p>\n<p>That must be music to Pyongyang&#8217;s ears.<br \/>***<br \/>ADDENDUM:&nbsp; These types of discussions always demand an important caveat:  BMD is not based entirely on shooting down missiles in flight.&nbsp;  Destroying launchers on the ground is always effective and our  capabilities to locate and target mobile missiles has improved since the  first Gulf War, along with our ability to pass that information to  airpower assets.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the number of aircraft available for SCUD hunting has  declined dramatically.&nbsp; At the start of Desert Shield, the U.S. Air  Force had more than 180 fighter squadrons.&nbsp; Twenty-five years later,  that total is at 54, and it will soon decline to 49&#8211;and not all of  those units are trained or equipped for taking out ballistic missiles.&nbsp;  Drones can fill part of that gap, but their payload is limited and UAVs  are more vulnerable to the large volume of AAA fire that North Korea can  generate.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, it&#8217;s worth noting that Dr. Jackson is a visiting fellow at the  Center for a New American Defense, a think tank founded by Democratic  security and policy experts.&nbsp; When he describes missile defense  capabilities in South Korea as &#8220;inching towards a crisis,&#8221; the situation  may be worse than we think.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A Theater High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) launcher.&nbsp; North Korea&#8217;s growing missile threat has led some analysts to suggest a THAAD deployment on the Korean peninsula (U.S. Army photo) As Stalin was fond of saying, &#8220;quantity has a quality all its own,&#8221; and that certainly applies to missile defense. One of the more effective counter-measures against [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":110783,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110782"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110782"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110782\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/110783"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}