{"id":110777,"date":"2017-11-30T14:21:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T14:21:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:03:55","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:03:55","slug":"sealing-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/sealing-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Sealing the Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>The expected deal between Iran and the U.S. has been widely condemned as  &#8220;paving the road&#8221; for Tehran to get the bomb.&nbsp; And rightfully so.&nbsp;  Talks that began years ago with the goal of preventing the mullahs from  enriching uranium will conclude with an &#8220;agreement&#8221; that makes Iran a  nuclear threshold state, never more than a year away from the bomb&#8211;but  only for the first decade of the agreement.&nbsp; After that, as President  Obama told NPR, breakout times &#8220;would have shrunk to almost zero.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In other words, Tehran&#8217;s membership in the nuclear club is inevitable.&nbsp;  At some point, the Iranian regime will find a convenient reason to scrap  the pending agreement and quickly build a bomb.&nbsp; And that assumes that  Iran will actually abide by a diplomatic agreement for at least a few  years&#8211;something it has never done in the past.<\/p>\n<p>It also presumes that Tehran does not have a covert development  effort&#8211;a very real possibility&#8211;that could produce weapons while its  leaders perpetuate the fiction of compliance.&nbsp; Lest we forget, a  half-dozen previously undisclosed sites have been uncovered in Iran  since 2000.&nbsp; Virtually all were revealed by Iranian opposition groups  and not western intelligence agencies.&nbsp; Their ability to ensure Iranian  compliance is suspect at best.&nbsp; The same can be said for the  International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). <\/p>\n<p>But history may ultimately judge that the final step in Tehran&#8217;s nuclear  march wasn&#8217;t the diplomatic agreement; the move that ultimately sealed  the deal came just a few days later, when <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/russia-lifts-ban-delivery-300-missiles-iran-130022298.html;_ylt=A0LEVjtS2i1VtwMAbQ8nnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTEzaHUycmc2BGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDWUhTMDAxXzEEc2VjA3Nj\">Russia lifted its long-standing ban <\/a>on selling the S-300 air defense system to the Iranians.<\/p>\n<p>Actually, Vladimir Putin didn&#8217;t need much arm-twisting to renew the  contract; Moscow has been chomping at the bit to provide the S-300 to  Iran, and the system may be delivered very quickly.&nbsp; Iranian officials  have stated they believe the advanced air defense system could be  operational in their country by the end of this year&#8211;and possibly, even  sooner.&nbsp; Tehran could arrange to have S-300 radars, missile launchers,  C2 units and support equipment flown in from Russia and manned  (initially) by Russian crews.&nbsp; That means Iran could have an initial  S-300 capability in a matter of weeks, rather than a matter of months.<\/p>\n<p>As we&#8217;ve written before, deployment of the S-300 in Iran represents a  game-changer, particularly in terms of a potential Israeli air strike.&nbsp;  The S-300 (or, if you prefer the NATO designation, SA-20) is one of the  most advanced surface-to-air missile systems in the world, with  excellent capabilities against both aircraft and ballistic missiles,  with a maximum range between 120-250 NM, depending on which interceptor  missile variant is employed.&nbsp; Think of the S-300 as an advanced version  of the U.S. Patriot and you&#8217;ve got the right idea; it&#8217;s a  state-of-the-art system that can provide overlapping coverage of Iranian  nuclear facilities, from a variety of threats.<\/p>\n<p>The S-300 is not invincible, but suppressing that type of system  requires significant investments in resources and time.&nbsp; The U.S., for  example, would employ salvos of cruise missiles to eliminate deployed  SAM batteries and eliminate support infrastructure.&nbsp; Cyber attacks would  be employed against the early warning and command-and-control networks  that support the S-300, in an effort to reduce situational awareness and  force individual batteries into autonomous or semi-autonomous  operations.&nbsp; As the S-300 network becomes increasingly fragmented,  stealth platforms like the F-22 would lead missions aimed at eliminating  most of the remaining launchers and radars, providing support and cover  for E\/F-18 Growlers (providing jamming support) and F-16CJs in the Wild  Weasel role. <\/p>\n<p>At a minimum, this effort would take dozens of cruise missile strikes  and scores of sorties over a period of several days.&nbsp; And that&#8217;s a  luxury that Israel doesn&#8217;t have.&nbsp; Even with forward basing in places  like Azerbaijan, or access through Saudi airspace, the Israeli Air Force  would be looking at complex, long-range missions and they would be  asset-limited by their small tanker fleet.&nbsp; Most estimates of an IAF  first strike against Iranian nuclear targets put the number of tactical  aircraft at somewhere between 24-36, roughly the maximum number that  could be refueled by six or seven Israeli tankers. <\/p>\n<p>That is not to say Israel is without options.&nbsp; With accurate  intelligence, they could take out the missiles shortly after delivery&#8211;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nydailynews.com\/news\/world\/syria-destroys-chemical-arms-equipment-day-watchdog-deadline-article-1.1502465\">as they did in Syria during the fall of 2013<\/a>.&nbsp;  But getting to southern Syria is a much easier proposition than flying  all the way to Iran and back.&nbsp; And, if the Russians opted for multiple  deliveries (by air) to several different locations, the IAF&#8217;s targeting  problems would be infinitely more complex. <\/p>\n<p>This much is certain: Israel&#8217;s &#8220;window&#8221; for eliminating the S-300 threat  (and bombing Iranian nuclear sites) is growing quite narrow.&nbsp; Russia  and Iran won&#8217;t rest until the air defense system is operational, and  Tehran always has the option of ratcheting up covert development  efforts, in facilities unknown to both the U.S. and Israel.&nbsp; The  Iranians know the IAF has only a limited ability to sustain a  long-distance air campaign against targets in their country, and arrival  of the S-300 will force the Israelis to rethink their options.&nbsp;  Meanwhile, the world power capable of sustaining an air campaign against  Iran (the United States) is firmly wedded to a &#8220;diplomatic solution&#8221;  that effectively gives Tehran the bomb. <\/p>\n<p>Put another way: Iran is no longer worried about a U.S. attack, and they  view the advanced SAM system as an effective insurance policy against  an Israeli strike.&nbsp; You might say Iran&#8217;s status as a nuclear power will  be secured by those first FLAP LID emissions and battery deployments  inside the Islamic Republic.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>****<br \/>ADDENDUM:&nbsp; If you need further proof that Iran isn&#8217;t worried about  American military action, consider President Obama&#8217;s comments about the  S-300 deal.&nbsp; According to Channel 10 in Israel, Mr. Obama said he was  surprised that Russia&#8217;s suspension of the missile sale &#8220;held this long,&#8221;  since <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesofisrael.com\/israel-analysts-shocked-by-obamas-comments-on-sanctions-s-300-supply\/\">Moscow was not barred from selling those &#8220;defensive&#8221; weapons<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Translated, Obama is privately pleased that Russia is going ahead with  the sale.&nbsp; He figures it will discourage an Israeli military strike, and  force everyone to go along with the so-called framework, recently  worked out in Switzerland.&nbsp; Meanwhile, Iran will remain on the cusp of  getting a nuclear weapon, with a greatly reduced threat to its nuclear  facilities, thanks to pending deployments of the S-300.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The expected deal between Iran and the U.S. has been widely condemned as &#8220;paving the road&#8221; for Tehran to get the bomb.&nbsp; And rightfully so.&nbsp; Talks that began years ago with the goal of preventing the mullahs from enriching uranium will conclude with an &#8220;agreement&#8221; that makes Iran a nuclear threshold state, never more than [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110777"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110777\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}