{"id":110710,"date":"2017-11-30T15:35:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T15:35:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:03:16","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:03:16","slug":"boots-already-on-ground","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/boots-already-on-ground\/","title":{"rendered":"Boots Already on the Ground?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Since deciding that ISIS isn&#8217;t the terrorist &#8220;jayvee team&#8221;&#8211;and  determining that it does pose a serious threat to our national  security&#8211;President Obama and members of his administration have been  steadfast in one claim:&nbsp;our battle against the insurgent army will not  involve &#8220;boots on the ground.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Until today.<\/p>\n<p>Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, General Martin  Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he would  &#8220;recommend deploying United States combat forces against Islamic  extremists in specific operations if the current strategy of airstrikes  was not successful.&#8221;&nbsp; As <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/09\/17\/world\/middleeast\/isis-airstrikes-united-states-coalition.html?_r=0\">The New York Times<\/a><\/em> observed,&nbsp;Dempsey&#8217;s scenario&nbsp;&#8220;raises the possibility of escalation that President Obama has flatly ruled out.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">General Dempsey&nbsp;said that while he was  confident in the ability of the coalition of American, European and  Middle Eastern governments to stop the Islamic State, he could not  completely close the door to eventually asking Mr. Obama to commit  ground troops to fight the group, known as ISIS or ISIL.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">\u201cMy view at this point is that this  coalition is the appropriate way forward. I believe that will prove  true,\u201d he said. \u201cBut if it fails to be true, and if there are threats to  the United States, then I of course would go back to the president and  make a recommendation that may include the use of U.S. military ground  forces.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><span style=\"font-size: x-small;\">But what if that escalation has already begun?&nbsp; <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Currently, just over 1,000 American troops are serving in Iraq.&nbsp;  Officially, most are assigned to security duties at the U.S. Embassy in  Baghdad, or protecting the city&#8217;s airport.&nbsp; But others are serving as  advisers to the Iraqi Army, or performing specialized&nbsp;medical,  maintenance and intelligence tasks.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>However, the U.S. military mission doesn&#8217;t end at the Baghdad city  limits.&nbsp; Last month, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told reporters  that&nbsp;260 U.S. special forces personnel are serving as military advisers  in northern Iraq, but cautioned it was not a &#8220;combat boots on the ground  kind of operation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Yet there are indications that some SOF personnel are in the combat  zone.&nbsp;&nbsp;Earlier this month,&nbsp;a reporter for the Daily Beast, Ford Sypher, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2014\/09\/02\/are-american-troops-already-fighting-on-the-front-lines-in-iraq.html\">reported seeing individuals who appeared to be western SOF operators near the strategic Mosul Dam<\/a>&nbsp;as he attempted to cover the&nbsp;Kurdish advance:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">At around 10 a.m., the Peshmerga  halted our movement. Fearing that the situation was changing rapidly, we  asked the Kurdish security element accompanying us what was happening.  \u201cWe don\u2019t know,\u201d they said, \u201cwe just got information that you cannot  move forward.\u201d Repeated calls were met with the same firm statement that  we could not move forward.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Stuck out in the open with no clear  sense of what was occurring in the battle that required us to be  stopped, we made contact with high-level Peshmerga ministries, both in  Erbil and on the ground in Zumar. \u201cYes, we want to let you in, but we  can\u2019t,\u201d said one high-level Kurdish government official. \u201cWe have  visitors, you\u2019ll see them,\u201d he stated. As we tried to decipher his  cryptic response our answer came: multiple armored Toyotas swept down  the mountain, passing within feet of us. The Toyotas were packed with  what appeared to be bearded Western Special Operations Forces. I watched  the trucks pass and saw for myself the crews inside them. They didn\u2019t  wear any identifying insignia but they were visibly Western and appeared  to match all the visual characteristics of American special operations  soldiers.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Contacts in the Kurdish intelligence  service and Peshmerga leadership confirmed what we saw. \u201cYes,\u201d one  commander replied to our questions. \u201cGerman and American forces are on  the ground here. \u201cThey are helping to support us in the attack.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\"><\/span><br \/>As the U.K. <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/news\/article-2740793\/American-forces-ground-Kurds-say-US-commandos-fighting-ISIS-northern-Iraq-Obama-said-no-combat-troops-fight.html\">Daily Mail<\/a><\/em> noted, Mr. Sypher knows&nbsp;quite a bit about special forces and the men  who make up those elite units.&nbsp; He is a former Army Ranger who served  multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>The Pentagon has repeatedly denied that any troops are&nbsp;directly involved in the fight against ISIS, but the <em>Daily Beast<\/em> account clearly contradicts that, and it begs an obvious question: why  continue the charade?&nbsp; It doesn&#8217;t take a military genius to know that  American airpower is much more effective when its coordinated from the  ground, and it&#8217;s quite likely that many of the air strikes you see on  cable news are being directed by western SOF personnel.<\/p>\n<p>And they may soon have plenty of company.&nbsp; Former NSA and CIA Director General Mike Hayden told Fox News Sunday <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsmax.com\/Newsmax-Tv\/hayden-5000-covert-forces\/2014\/09\/14\/id\/594505\/\">there could be as many as 5,000 covert boots on the ground <em>in Syria<\/em> (emphasis ours) by the end of this year<\/a>,&nbsp;and the&nbsp;first elements of that force&nbsp;are apparently now engaged in northern Iraq.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>SOF personnel and CIA covert ops specialists are accustomed to being in  places they&#8217;re not supposed to be, without the public sanction of our  political and military leaders.&nbsp; In some cases, that&#8217;s necessary for  operational security and the ultimate success of the mission.&nbsp; But in  this case, denials are little more than political cover for an  administration that pledged &#8220;no more boots on the ground&#8221; in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>So what happens when one of those brave men is wounded or gives their  life&nbsp;in a battle&nbsp;purportedly being fought by others?&nbsp; As in the past,  such casualties will probably be described as &#8220;training accidents&#8221; and  the truth will dribble out years&#8211;or even decades&#8211;later. <\/p>\n<p>If our troops are already engaged on the ground in Iraq (and elsewhere)  the administration might try something novel: the truth.&nbsp;&nbsp;Developing the  support required for a long fight against ISIS means leveling with the  American people and telling them it can&#8217;t be won through airpower  alone.&nbsp; We will need boots on the ground for the hard, dirty work of  disrupting terrorist networks and killing their fighters&#8211;with the full  knowledge and support of the nation that sends them&nbsp;in harm&#8217;s way.<\/p>\n<p>Surely those anonymous men in those armored Toyotas deserve that much.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since deciding that ISIS isn&#8217;t the terrorist &#8220;jayvee team&#8221;&#8211;and determining that it does pose a serious threat to our national security&#8211;President Obama and members of his administration have been steadfast in one claim:&nbsp;our battle against the insurgent army will not involve &#8220;boots on the ground.&#8221; Until today. Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, General [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110710"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110710"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110710\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110710"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110710"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110710"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}