{"id":110645,"date":"2017-11-30T16:05:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T16:05:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:02:39","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:02:39","slug":"the-next-disaster","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/11\/30\/the-next-disaster\/","title":{"rendered":"The Next Disaster"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>***<br \/>UPDATE\/10 Nov\/&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>The terms &#8220;backbone&#8221; and &#8220;France&#8221; are rarely mentioned in the same  sentence, but&nbsp;today marks an exception to that general rule.&nbsp; According  to various media accounts, the proposed nuclear deal between Iran, the  United States and the EU powers fell apart when France <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/8301-202_162-57611647\/no-deal-reached-in-iran-nuke-talks\/\">objected to its generous terms<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Think about that for a moment.&nbsp; The socialist government of France is  worried that the U.S. and its allies are going too easy on the mullahs  and their nuclear program, while everyone else couldn&#8217;t wait to sign on  the dotted line.&nbsp;&nbsp;Call it a minor miracle.&nbsp; Call it a triumph of common  sense.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Vive la France.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Incidentally, the nuclear talks are set to resume later this&nbsp;month,  giving Secretary of State John Kerry a little time to &#8220;work&#8221; on his  French counterparts.&nbsp; This &#8220;very bad deal&#8221; isn&#8217;t dead yet.<\/p>\n<p>***&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s scary to contemplate, but there may come a moment&#8211;in a matter of  just weeks or months&#8211;when we&#8217;ll look back on the failed Obamacare  roll-out with a tinge of nostalgia.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>You see, there is another debacle looming on the horizon, in the&nbsp;foreign  policy arena.&nbsp;&nbsp;It&#8217;s a catastrophe that will make a fatally-flawed  health care plan look like a&nbsp;minor policy blunder.&nbsp;&nbsp;Borrowing a phrase  from former President George H.W. Bush, what you &#8220;don&#8217;t know about  domestic policy&#8221;&nbsp;loses elections; what you don&#8217;t know about foreign  policy gets people killed.&nbsp; And a lot of people may die in the Middle  East in relatively short order.<\/p>\n<p>The&nbsp;door to disaster is being opened by an apparent deal between  Washington and Tehran on the Iranian nuclear program.&nbsp; Secretary of  State John Kerry flew to Geneva today to join the talks, amid word that  an agreement is near.&nbsp; While details have yet to be announced, sources  suggest that Iran will be allowed to keep its nuclear efforts, while  giving up virtually nothing in return.&nbsp; At <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/363497\/how-bad-deal-it-ask-bibi-elliott-abrams\">National Review<\/a>, Elliott Abrams explains just how bad the proposed deal would be:<\/p>\n<p>Iran gets billions of dollars in financial relief \u2014 the amount is  unclear but relief from gold-trading sanctions alone is worth billions \u2014  and starts the process of reversing the sanctions momentum. Henceforth  there will be fewer international sanctions, not more. In exchange, does  it pull back from its nuclear-weapons program? From what we know now,  it does not. Not one centrifuge is taken apart, as Netanyahu noted:  There are 18,000 today, and 18,000 under this deal. Natanz and other  sites remain intact. Not one ounce of enriched uranium is shipped  overseas. Apparently Iran won\u2019t enrich beyond 3.5 percent under this  deal, but can build up limitless stocks of low-enriched uranium.<\/p>\n<p>Abandoned here is the test of whether Iran needs any of this for a  genuinely peaceful program; abandoned are the unanimous U.N. Security  Council and IAEA Board resolutions that called for zero enrichment;  abandoned is the test of whether Iran is truly further from a bomb.<\/p>\n<p>[snip]<\/p>\n<p>The Obama administration entered these negotiations from a position of  strength; Iran needs sanctions reflief badly.&nbsp; But it acted as if we  were the weak party, desperately seeking a deal, any dea.&nbsp; The wily  Iranian negotiators smelled this instantly and struck.<\/p>\n<p>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was even more blunt, calling  it &#8220;a very bad deal.&#8221;&nbsp;&nbsp;He also noted that&nbsp;Israel is not bound by any  agreement between the U.S. and Iran, and remains ready to defend its  interests.<\/p>\n<p>In an interview with NBC News, Mr. Obama said&nbsp;the current talks were not  aimed at sanctions relief.&nbsp; But Eli Lake at&nbsp;The Daily Beast discovered  that the&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2013\/11\/08\/exclusive-obama-s-secret-iran-d-tente.html\">U.S. began easing financial restrictions on Iran several months ago.<\/a>&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Bottom line: Iran&#8217;s path to the nuclear club just got a lot easier, and  the Middle East is quickly plunging into chaos.&nbsp; An Israeli strike  against Iranian nuclear facilities is now inevitable, and&nbsp;could lead to a  wider, regional conflict.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>There is also the spectre of a nuclear arms race in the Persian Gulf,  involving some of Tehran&#8217;s neighbors.&nbsp; The BBC reported &nbsp; earlier this  week that Saudi&nbsp;Arabia has already &#8220;ordered&#8221; nuclear weapons from  Pakistan and could take delivery shortly after Iran&nbsp;joins the nuclear  club.&nbsp; The Saudis have been silent partners in Islamabad&#8217;s nuclear  program for years, with the understanding that the Paks would provide  nuclear arms (and expertise)&nbsp;if Riyadh&nbsp;deems it necessary.&nbsp; Other Gulf  states&#8211;including the United Arab Emirates and Qatar&#8211;might embark on  similar efforts, to protect their own interests.<\/p>\n<p>What about the U.S. nuclear umbrella?&nbsp; At this point, American  credibility in the region is at a low ebb and many leaders have no faith  in U.S. promises to defend them.&nbsp; That&#8217;s why a senior Saudi official  paid a highly-publicized visit to Moscow earlier this year and there  have been recent overtures from the&nbsp;Egyptian military to their Russian  counterparts,&nbsp;five decades&nbsp;after Anwar Sadat&nbsp;severed ties with the  Soviet Union.&nbsp;&nbsp;No wonder Vladimir Putin is so anxious to conclude a  nuclear deal with Iran; not only does his ally get a clear path to a  nuclear capability, his own influence (and that of Russia) will grow  significantly, as various Arab states look to Moscow for military  hardware and security guarantees.<\/p>\n<p>Why is the U.S. so intent on signing on to a very bad deal?&nbsp; Part of the  answer can be found in Barack Obama&#8217;s almost limitless faith in  negotiations;&nbsp;if you can reach a deal (he apparently believes), you can  somehow persuade the other side to live up to the agreement, no matter  what their track record.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>Consider the nuclear accord between the United States and North Korea,  reached during the tenure of President George W. Bush.&nbsp; The agreement  was supposed to curb Pyongyang&#8217;s nuclear ambitions;&nbsp;instead, it allowed  North Korea to covertly pursue a nuclear weapons capability while  receiving energy aid and other forms of assistance for supposedly  &#8220;complying&#8221; with the deal.&nbsp; There is no evidence that Iran will be any  more compliant with any agreement it might reach with the U.S. and its  allies.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, the White House and the State Department are plunging blindly  ahead, in part to satisfy the egos of the commander-in-chief and his  secretary of state.&nbsp;&nbsp;Mr. Obama has long viewed himself as a  transformational figure on the world stage, an image that was reinforced  by his receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize early in his first term.&nbsp; Never  mind that President Obama had done nothing to actually earn&nbsp;the award;  when&nbsp;read your press clippings long enough, you will finally start  believing&nbsp;in your &#8220;powers.&#8221;&nbsp; Besides, with the president&#8217;s popularity in  decline (thanks to Obamacare), a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran  can&nbsp;certainly change the conversation.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, Secretary of State John Kerry is also in search of a  legacy.&nbsp;&nbsp;Having failed to generate an agreement between Israel and the  Palestinians, Mr. Kerry now has his sights on Iran, with no regard for  the wider consequences.&nbsp; Perhaps he thinks the inevitable war, the  regional nuclear arms race and the other, inevitable reprecussions can  be delayed until 2017&#8211;or until Mr. Kerry retires to&nbsp;write his memoirs.<\/p>\n<p>Worse yet, you can make a case that President Obama and John Kerry  really don&#8217;t care.&nbsp; Along with former Secretary of State Hillary  Clinton, they have presided over&nbsp;an administration that has been openly  hostile to Israel, to the point of&nbsp;openly complaining about having to  deal with Prime Minister Netanyahu.<\/p>\n<p>Against that backdrop, is it any wonder that President&nbsp;Obama and our  Secretary of State are rushing headlong into the worst diplomatic deal  since Munich?&nbsp; One recalls Winston Churchill&#8217;s famous reaction to that  agreement, noting that England and France had a choice between dishonour  and war; you &#8220;chose dishonour and you shall have war.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Then again, the current administration doesn&#8217;t have much use for Mr.  Churchill, either.&nbsp; As you&#8217;ll recall, one of Mr. Obama&#8217;s first  &#8220;decorating&#8221; acts at the White House was to remove the bust of the&nbsp;late  Prime Minister, which was unceremoniously returned to the British  Embassy in 2009.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Churchill knew a few things about fixing disasters.&nbsp; We can only hope Mr. Obama&#8217;s successor has similar skills.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>***UPDATE\/10 Nov\/&nbsp; The terms &#8220;backbone&#8221; and &#8220;France&#8221; are rarely mentioned in the same sentence, but&nbsp;today marks an exception to that general rule.&nbsp; According to various media accounts, the proposed nuclear deal between Iran, the United States and the EU powers fell apart when France objected to its generous terms. Think about that for a moment.&nbsp; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110645"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110645\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}