{"id":110561,"date":"2017-12-02T09:34:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T09:34:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:01:53","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:01:53","slug":"seizure-in-gulf-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/seizure-in-gulf-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Seizure in the Gulf"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Look for tensions in the Persian Gulf (and Northeast Asia) to ratchet up a notch.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ap9U2VfbfCBs\">According to Bloomberg<\/a>,  the United Arab Emirates recently seized a shipment of North Korean  arms bound for Iran. Diplomatic sources indicate that the UAE notified  the UN of the seizure two weeks ago, shortly after it occurred.<\/p>\n<p>Not surprisingly, the Abu Dhabi government has been rather tight-lipped about the seizure. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.alertnet.org\/thenews\/newsdesk\/N28380600.htm\">But other sources tell Reuters <\/a>that  the intercept occurred on 14 August, and the cargo included rocket  launchers, detonators, munition and ammunition for rocket-propelled  grenades&#8211;the very items Iran has used kill U.S. troops in Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>The  shipment represents a clear violation of UN Security Council Resolution  1874, which bans all arms transfers from Pyongyang. It was passed  earlier this year, after North Korea conducted its second nuclear test.  The measure also authorizes other nations to search suspicious vessels,  and destroy banned items.<\/p>\n<p>Pyongyang used elaborate measures in an  attempt to conceal the shipment. The ship&#8217;s manifest listed its cargo  as &#8220;oil boring machines;&#8221; the intercepted vessel belongs to an  Australian firm that is owned by a French conglomerate, flying the  Bahamian flag. An Italian firm, with offices in Shanghai, reportedly  arranged the shipment.<\/p>\n<p>Under the UN mandate, North Korea and Iran  now have 15 days to offer a detailed explanation for the shipment, but  don&#8217;t hold your breath. Having been caught red-handed, the two rogue  states will likely accuse the U.S. and its allies of &#8220;manufacturing&#8221; the  evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most intriguing element of this episode is  the claim that Abu Dhabi discovered the shipment on its own. That  scenario is plausible; the Emirates spend freely on national defense and  have a credible intelligence service for a country their size.<\/p>\n<p>But  ferreting out a complex arms shipment&#8211;and tracking the vessel on its  journey from North Korea&#8211;required more extensive SIGINT, IMINT and  surveillance resources, something the Emirates currently lack. It  doesn&#8217;t take an intel analyst to see the hand of the U.S. in this  intercept. Indeed, it would be interesting to learn the proximity of the  nearest American naval vessel at the time of the seizure, and the radio  chatter\/information sharing that preceded it.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, that  raises a couple of questions. First, if Washington provided the intel  information that prompted the intercept, why not assign the job to  American naval forces? True, letting the Emirates handle the task  creates the impression of international resolve and a united front  against Pyongyang. But it also suggests that the Obama Administration  was trying to avoid a direct confrontation with North Korea and Iran,  still hoping for negotiations with both regimes.<\/p>\n<p>Such a  &#8220;strategy&#8221; amounts to little more than a fool&#8217;s errand. As Tehran and  Pyongyang have demonstrated&#8211;time and time again&#8211;they are undeserving  of unilateral talks with the United States. Moreover, if Mr. Obama wants  to lead the global effort against banned arms exports, then he must be  prepared to take a more active role militarily.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, naval  forces from the UAE did the heavy lifting in this operation, and that  entails risks for Abu Dhabi. The Emirates have a long-standing dispute  with Iran over islands in the Persian Gulf and its possible that Tehran  may test its rival, in retaliation for the weapons seizure.<\/p>\n<p>And  that brings us to our second question. The UAE has advanced weaponry  (its state-of-the-art F-16s are currently participating in Red Flag at  Nellis AFB, Nevada) and trained personnel, backed by the best contractor  assistance money can buy. However, the Emirates would require help from  the U.S. in fending off certain types of attacks&#8211;say a missile  strike&#8211;or a sustained Iranian campaign against oil targets in the Gulf.<\/p>\n<p>At  what point is the U.S. prepared to support its ally, which took a  calculated risk in boarding that Australian vessel, carrying North  Korean arms to Iran? It&#8217;s a query that is likely being posed in Abu  Dhabi (and other capitals) from the Gulf, to the Far East.  Unfortunately, the answer to that question is anything but clear.<br \/>***<br \/>ADDENDUM:  In light of the recent seizure, you can expect an increase in arms  delivery flights between North Korea and Iran. IL-76 &#8220;Candids&#8221; (similar  to our retired C-141s) regularly transit between Pyongyang and Tehran.  With no restriction on air traffic between the two nations, it will be  relatively easy to fly most of the illicit cargo to Iran.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Look for tensions in the Persian Gulf (and Northeast Asia) to ratchet up a notch. According to Bloomberg, the United Arab Emirates recently seized a shipment of North Korean arms bound for Iran. Diplomatic sources indicate that the UAE notified the UN of the seizure two weeks ago, shortly after it occurred. Not surprisingly, the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110561"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}