{"id":110473,"date":"2017-12-02T10:24:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T10:24:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:01:11","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:01:11","slug":"the-next-test-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/the-next-test-2\/","title":{"rendered":"The Next Test"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/world\/2009-02-11-nkorea-missile_N.htm?csp=34\">North Korea is apparently moving ahead with preparations for another test of its Tapeodong-2 long-range missile<\/a>, which is capable of striking Alaska, Hawaii and other U.S. possessions in the Pacific.<\/p>\n<p>South  Korea&#8217;s semi-official Yonhap news agency reported on Wednesday that  Pyongyang has moved additional equipment to the Musudan-ni test site on  the Sea of Japan. That account comes barely a week after <a href=\"http:\/\/formerspook.blogspot.com\/2009\/02\/comprehensive-approach.html\">media outlets in South Korea and Japan reported that North Korea had transported a TD-2 airframe to the same test facility<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The  Yonhap story suggests that the DPRK is following the same pattern  observed before the 2006 Tapeodong-2 test, which ended in failure after  only 100 seconds of flight. Prior to that event, the North Koreans moved  the missile to Musudan-ni, placed it on the launch pad and assembled  the necessary support equipment to conduct and monitor the test.  Pyongyang made little effort to hide its preparations, despite their  proficiency at denial and deception techniques.<\/p>\n<p>Almost three  years later, North Korea appears equally transparent about its  intentions. Kim Jong-il&#8217;s regime wants the U.S.&#8211;and its allies in the  region&#8211;to know that a TD-2 launch is in the offing. Pyongyang will  certainly use the test&#8211;or the threat of a test&#8211;as a bargaining chip in  future negotiations with Washington, Seoul and Tokyo.<\/p>\n<p>While the  launch of a TD-2 would be a serious provocation, the Obama  Administration has said little about the matter. During yesterday&#8217;s  press conference at the Pentagon, <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/wireStory?id=6849392\">Defense Secretary Robert Gates played down reports of a possible test, and even joked about the missile&#8217;s past failure<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;Since  the first time that they launched the missile it flew for a few minutes  before crashing, the range of the Taepodong-2 remains to be seen,&#8221;  Gates told reporters. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">&#8220;So far, it&#8217;s very short.&#8221; <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">While  Gates&#8217; observation is certainly accurate, there is a certain danger in  dismissing North Korea&#8217;s capabilities&#8211;and its determination to field a  crude ICBM. Over the last 20 years, Pyongyang has advanced from  short-range FROG-7 and SCUD systems, to medium and intermediate-range  systems like the TD-1 and the BM-25. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">With  a successful launch of the TD-2, the DPRK will raise the ante,  demonstrating the ability to strike U.S. facilities across much of the  Pacific. And, at some point, North Korea will develop a missile system  capable of delivering a nuclear, chemical or biological warhead to the  CONUS. While Pyongyang&#8217;s intercontinental strike capabilities will  remain meager (at best), perfection of the TD-2 will change the  geopolitical calculus. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">How  will the Obama team deal with that possibility? At this point, no one  really knows. So far, their plan for dealing with Pyongyang seems to be  based on a continuation of the &#8220;Six Party Talks&#8221; (begun by the Bush  Administration), and a more deliberate approach toward missile defense. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Secretary  of State Hillary Clinton is scheduled to visit the region next week,  for meetings with South Korean and Japanese leaders. While the activity  at Musudan-ni will certainly come up in those conversations, there has  been no indication of how Ms. Clinton will address the matter. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Her  visit comes at a critical time for the region. Both Seoul and Tokyo are  demanding a tougher approach toward North Korea, a position that puts  them (slightly) at odds with the United States. South Korea&#8217;s new,  conservative president has abandoned the &#8220;Sunshine Policy&#8221; of his  predecessors, demanding that North Korea comply with existing agreements  as a condition for further talks and additional aid. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Tokyo  is also tired of Pyongyang&#8217;s games, and is still waiting for a full  accounting of Japanese citizens kidnapped by North Korean agents over  the past 30 years. Reconciling Japanese and South Korean demands with  the U.S. position on North Korea (whatever that might be) will be one of  Ms. Clinton&#8217;s primary tasks during her trip to the Far East. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Meanwhile,  there&#8217;s the matter of how Washington should respond to Pyongyang&#8217;s test  preparations&#8211;a key indicator of how the Obama Administration will deal  with North Korea. Prior to the 2006 TD-2 test, the U.S. announce plans  to intercept the missile, if it threatened our territory. As part of  that plan, land-based missile defenses in Alaska and California were  placed on alert, and Navy ships with the SM-3 interceptor missile moved  into the Sea of Japan. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">Unfortunately,  there are no indications that Mr. Obama will approve similar measures  this time around. And that&#8217;s rather unfortunate; both Japan and South  Korea backed those steps in 2006, viewing them as a measure of America&#8217;s  commitment to the region, and our bi-lateral defense ties to both  nations. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">It&#8217;s  the kind of reassurance that Washington needs to demonstrate once more,  as North Korea readies for another TD-2 test. Failing to provide such  assurances will set the tone for future dealings with Tokyo and Seoul,  and currently, the silence from Washington is deafening. So, don&#8217;t be  surprised if Hillary Clinton gets an extremely cool reception on her  first major trip as Secretary of State. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">***<\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">ADDENDUM:  Secretary Gates&#8217; dismissive comments about the TD-2 suggest there may  be a disagreement between U.S. intelligence services, and their  counterparts in Japan and South Korea. So far, no one in the American  intelligence community&#8211;even those anonymous sources&#8211;have verified the  &#8220;pending test&#8221; reports that have appeared in the regional media. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">In  fairness, we should note that the Japanese and ROK press have sometimes  printed claims about North Korea that had no basis in fact. But in this  case, the media reports are apparently based on information obtained  from U.S.-operated platforms (read: electro-optical imagery satellites),  whose output is shared with U.S. allies, typically at the SECRET level.  <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">In  other words, movement of the airframe container (and the support  equipment) was tracked by overhead platforms, and analyzed by imagery  experts in the U.S., Japan and South Korea. Analysts in Tokyo and Seoul  have reached the conclusion that North Korea is preparing for a TD-2  test; the assessment of their American counterparts remains unclear. We  should note, however, that South Korean and Japanese analysts are  comparing current imagery to what they saw in 2006, and it apparently  fits the same pattern. <\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">On  the other hand, the U.S. doesn&#8217;t share products from some of its more  sophisticated sensors, capable of monitoring DPRK activities in &#8220;other&#8221;  spectral bands, or during periods of bad weather. Does collection from  those platforms support the storyline from Tokyo and Seoul? We&#8217;ll find  out in the coming weeks. With an accelerated effort, North Korea could  attempt a TD-2 launch toward the end of March, to coincide with the end  of its annual Winter Training Cycle. That gives Mr. Obama about five  weeks to prepare for that possibility and respond. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>North Korea is apparently moving ahead with preparations for another test of its Tapeodong-2 long-range missile, which is capable of striking Alaska, Hawaii and other U.S. possessions in the Pacific. South Korea&#8217;s semi-official Yonhap news agency reported on Wednesday that Pyongyang has moved additional equipment to the Musudan-ni test site on the Sea of Japan. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110473"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110473"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110473\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110473"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110473"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110473"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}