{"id":110379,"date":"2017-12-02T15:49:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T15:49:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T11:00:20","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T11:00:20","slug":"heading-to-court-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/heading-to-court-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Heading to Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>The bizarre case of two Army officers who tried to alter a paternity  test to avoid paying child support is expected to be settled in a  Pennsylvania court room, possibly as early as next month.<\/p>\n<p>Cumberland County Assistant District Attorney Derek Clepper tells <em>In From the Cold<\/em> that Army Colonel Scott Carlson and Lt Col Bruce Adkins could face  trial in late March, on felony and misdemeanor charges relating to the  phony paternity test.<\/p>\n<p>Clepper says he does not believe the case  against Carlson and Adkins will be settled through a plea bargain, due  to the number of charges filed against the two officers, and the  severity of the alleged crimes. Mr. Clepper says that Adkins\u2019 attorney  inquired about a possible plea deal for his client in December, shortly  after the Lt Col was arraigned on eight different charges in the case.<\/p>\n<p>However,  discussions about a potential deal broke off after prosecutors insisted  that Adkins plead guilty to felony, rather than misdemeanor charges.  Lieutenant Colonel Adkins is accused of obstruction of justice,  conspiracy to tamper with evidence, conspiracy theft by deception,  forgery, solicitation of forgery, and three other charges for his role  in the alleged scheme. Adkins entered a not guilty plea to all charges  at his arraignment in December.<\/p>\n<p>Carlson, the alleged mastermind  of the scheme, is facing ten different felony and misdemeanor charges,  ranging from criminal solicitation to tamper with public records and  solicitation to fabricate evidence, to obstruction of justice, forgery  and theft by deception. If convicted on all counts, both Carlson and  Adkins could be sentenced to more that 50 years in prison.<\/p>\n<p>According  to the Cumberland County District Attorney\u2019s Office, Colonel Carlson is  currently completing a \u201cmail-in\u201d arraignment through his local  attorney. Prosecutors also expect Carlson to enter a not guilty plea,  setting the stage for his court date later this spring. If the mail-in  arraignment is concluded in the next 2-3 weeks (as expected), Mr.  Clepper believes the case against the two officers could go to trial at  the end of March.<\/p>\n<p>Carlson and Adkins were classmates at the U.S.  Army War College at Carlisle Barracks in Cumberland County (near  Harrisburg), when the plot unfolded last spring. The mother of Carlson\u2019s  nine-year-old daughter requested an increase in child support, from  $400-$600 a month. Due to Carlson\u2019s assignment at the war college, the  case wound up in the Pennsylvania court.<\/p>\n<p>While Colonel Carlson  had paid support in the past, he claimed that the child was not his, and  asked for genetic testing to prove paternity. However, when Adkins  showed up to provide a DNA sample, court personnel determined that he  was not the same man who requested the paternity test. Fingerprints and  other military records confirmed the attempted deception.<\/p>\n<p>By the  time investigators concluded their probe, both officers had completed  the prestigious war college and moved on to other assignments, Adkins at  Ft McPherson, Georgia, and Carlson in Egypt. While Mr. Clepper reports  that Pennsylvania authorities had \u201cinitial difficulty\u201d in getting  Colonel Carlson back to the states for arraignment, he apparently  returned from Egypt in early November. Carlson\u2019s current assignment is  also at Ft McPherson.<\/p>\n<p>Despite his \u201cnot guilty\u201d plea, Adkins has  provided a statement to prosecutors, and Clepper said it is possible  that the Lt Col may be called to testify against Carlson. Mr. Clepper  indicated that Adkins\u2019 information provided a better \u201ctimeline\u201d of  events associated with the case.<\/p>\n<p>By comparison, Colonel Carlson  has not offered information to Pennsylvania officials, and Clepper  doesn\u2019t expect him to. \u201cThat\u2019s his right,\u201d the prosecutor observed.<\/p>\n<p>The  assistant district attorney claims that the state will present  compelling evidence when the case goes to trial. \u201cI believe I can prove  every element of these crimes, \u201c Clepper said in an interview, \u201cif the  defendants testify, or even if they don\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers representing  Carlson and Adkins did not immediately respond to e-mail requests for  comment. However, Colonel Carlson and his attorney outlined a possible  defense in December, at a court hearing on the child support issue.<\/p>\n<p>During  that proceeding, Carlson produced a letter that requested cancellation  of last April\u2019s DNA test. Mr. Clepper and court officials said it was  the \u201cfirst time\u201d they had seen the letter. The Colonel did not explain  why Adkins still appeared on the referenced date\u2014posing as Carlson&#8211;and  provided the DNA sample.<\/p>\n<p>Adkins\u2019 motivation for taking part in  the scheme remains murky. In his statement to authorities, Lt Col Adkins  said that he agreed to participate \u201cto help [Colonel] Carlson save his  marriage.\u201d Prosecutor Clepper says he is unsure if Adkins had \u201cother  reasons\u201d for assisting Carlson.<\/p>\n<p>The two Army officers could go on  trial as early as March 24th, based on the current court calendar\u2014and  the expected completion of Carlson\u2019s mail-in arraignment. If that  process is delayed, Clepper says the trial would begin on April 17th or  May 19th.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond their Pennsylvania court date, Carlson and  Adkins could also face criminal prosecution from the Army. A decision on  military charges is expected after completion of civilian proceedings  against the two men.<\/p>\n<p>Clepper describes the case as \u201cone of the  strangest\u201d he&#8217;s handled during his years as a prosecutor. The assistant  district attorney says he can\u2019t remember the last time an Army War  College student faced felony charges in Cumberland County.<\/p>\n<p>The  program is considered the \u201ccapstone\u201d of an officer\u2019s military education.  Selection for the course is highly competitive, and typically reserved  for best and brightest officers in the armed forces. Many war college  graduates go on to reach flag rank in their respective services.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cumberlink.com\/articles\/2008\/01\/15\/news\/news483.txt\">But,  a preliminary hearing in the Carlson-Adkins case raised questions about  the officers&#8217; past conduct, and why they were selected for the course. <\/a>A  Cumberland County Domestic Relations Officer testified that the mother  of Carlson&#8217;s daughter&#8211;who filed the request for increased child  support&#8211;was a soldier in the Colonel&#8217;s battalion when their affair  began.<\/p>\n<p>Improper relationships between superiors and subordinates  are prohibited under Army regulations, and may result in punishment  under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Testimony at the January  hearing also revealed that another soldier once accused Adkins of  assault&#8211;a claim that was reflected in the Lieutenant Colonel&#8217;s military  records.  The board that selected Adkins for the war college was almost  certainly aware of the purported assault; it&#8217;s unclear if Carlson&#8217;s  superiors were aware of his past affair with a subordinate.     <\/p>\n<p>Adkins  and Carlson are not the first defendants accused of faking a paternity  test in Cumberland County. In an earlier case, a man was charged with  providing DNA to help his brother &#8220;beat&#8221; a paternity suit. Their plan  eventually unraveled, and both men wound up in prison, after being  convicted on lesser charges than those facing the Army officers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The bizarre case of two Army officers who tried to alter a paternity test to avoid paying child support is expected to be settled in a Pennsylvania court room, possibly as early as next month. Cumberland County Assistant District Attorney Derek Clepper tells In From the Cold that Army Colonel Scott Carlson and Lt Col [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110379"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110379\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}