{"id":110210,"date":"2017-12-02T17:11:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T17:11:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:58:44","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:58:44","slug":"deferred-until-december-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/deferred-until-december-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Deferred Until December"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_Y7kQSOBuEJw\/Rskn17B26II\/AAAAAAAAAEk\/sOkjO8pL7fo\/s1600-h\/KC-30.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"320\" height=\"231\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5100651860305832066\" src=\"http:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/kc-30-2.jpg\" class=\"wp-image-110211\" style=\"cursor: hand;\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>The Airbus\/Northrup-Grumman KC-30 [and]<\/em><br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_Y7kQSOBuEJw\/Rsknq7B26HI\/AAAAAAAAAEc\/VpZqPUB9vas\/s1600-h\/KC-767.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"250\" height=\"167\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5100651671327271026\" src=\"http:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/12\/kc-767-1.jpg\" class=\"wp-image-110212\" style=\"cursor: hand;\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Boeing&#8217;s  KC-767. One of these aircraft will win the Air Force KC-X competition,  and a contract to build the service&#8217;s next-generation tanker aircraft.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The  Air Force will wait until the end of the year to announce the winner of  a $40-billion tanker contract, extending talks with bidders beyond the  original, October deadline.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.airforcetimes.com\/news\/2007\/08\/airforce_tankercontract_070819\/\">According to the AP<\/a>,  the two-month delay is viewed as a cautionary move by defense industry  analysts, given the controversy the contract has created. Rivals Boeing  and Northrup-Grumman are competing to provide 179 new tanker aircraft  for the Air Force. The so-called KC-X program will form the backbone of  the service&#8217;s tanker fleet well into the 21st Century.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing, which boasts that it has built refueling aircraft for 75 years, is offering <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Boeing_KC-767\">a military version of its 767 jetliner, which has been in wide service for more than 20 years<\/a>. The Northrup-Grumman entrant, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/KC-30\">the KC-30<\/a>,  is a tanker variant of the European Airbus A330. If Northrup-Grumman  wins the contract, the new tankers would be built at an assembly plant  in Mobile, Alabama, to blunt criticism about the Pentagon&#8217;s possible  purchase of a &#8220;foreign&#8221; tanker.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing&#8217;s 767 has been in service  for more than a quarter-century, gaining a reputation as a reliable,  long-range jetliner. The A330 first flew a decade later, and 480 have  been produced&#8211;about half as many as the more popular 767.  Northrup-Grumman claim that the KC-30 can off-load 20% more fuel than  the KC-767 and haul significantly more cargo than its Boeing-built  rival.<\/p>\n<p>However, Boeing notes that its tanker is cheaper than the  Airbus jet (about $40 million a copy), and it can access a wider network  of spare parts and maintenance facilities, given the larger number of  767s in operational service. Parts &#8220;commonality&#8221; was one of the key  considerations when the USAF acquired 55 McDonnell-Douglas KC-10s in the  1980s; each of those tanker\/cargo aircraft can use roughly 88% of the  parts found on DC-10\/MD-11 aircraft, which are now produced by Boeing,  thanks to a corporate merger with McDonnell-Douglas.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically,  the current competition between Boeing and Northrup-Grumman might not  have materialized, except for the infamous &#8220;tanker scandal&#8221; which  engulfed the service&#8211;and the Chicago-based defense contractor&#8211;a few  years back. In mid-2002, the Air Force approved a plan to lease KC-767s  from Boeing; however, that deal collapsed when it was discovered that  the service&#8217;s senior civilian contracting official&#8211;Darlene Druyun had  negotiated a job with the contractor while overseeing the tanker deal.  Druyun was eventually sentenced to nine months in prison.<\/p>\n<p>Congressional  reaction to the tanker scandal all-but-ensured that Boeing would have a  competitor when the contract was re-opened for bidding. Enter the  KC-30, built upon Airbus&#8217;s initial success in selling the tanker to  Britain, Australian, the United Arab Emirates and most recently, Saudi  Arabia. While the number of tankers purchased is rather small, it gave  Airbus (and its <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/EADS\">European defense partner, EADS<\/a>)  a toehold in the tanker market, which it quickly parlayed into USAF  tanker competition, through the alliance with Northrup-Grumman.<\/p>\n<p>Boeing  has also sold small numbers of KC-767s to other countries; the Italian  Air Force became the new tanker&#8217;s &#8220;launch customer&#8221; in 2005, and plans  to purchase four aircraft. Additionally, Japan&#8217;s Air Force is also  acquiring four KC-767s, to complement an equal number of AWACS aircraft,  also based on the 767 airframe.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, Boeing&#8217;s years of  tanker experience, long relationship with the USAF, and the implied  pressure to &#8220;buy American&#8221; will likely carry the day. The KC-30 is a  fine aircraft, but it carries an 81% greater &#8220;ground footprint&#8221; than the  older KC-135, meaning that you can&#8217;t fit as many of the Airbus tankers  onto small airfields in combat zones. A USAF analysis also suggests that  the KC-30 would require more extensive logistical and infrastructure  support, limiting its ability to deploy worldwide.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever the  outcome, the Air Force&#8217;s December decision on the tanker contract will  certainly generate controversy, and (possibly) more delays. Late last  year, the service awarded Boeing a multi-billion dollar deal to build  its new Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) helicopter, prompting protests  from other contractors. As a result, the contract was re-opened for  bids, giving rivals Sikorsky and Lockheed-Martin another crack at Boeing  and its winning CH-47 design.<\/p>\n<p>While that process may ensure  fairness, it will also delay deliveries of needed choppers to rescue  units now equipped with the HH-60 Pave Hawk. A similar delay in the  tanker competition will slow replacement of aging KC-135s, at a time  when some of the oldest variants have been grounded due to structural  problems. Not too many years ago, announcement of a winner meant just  that: a defense firm had submitted a proposal that met price and  performance standards, putting it ahead of the competition. At that  point, the losers (typically) dusted themselves off and moved on,  concentrating their products on other programs up for bids.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s  not how the game is played today. The recent CSAR helicopter  controversy illustrates had competitors can persuade DoD to re-open a  contract. essentially giving them another shot&#8211;and forcing the original  &#8220;winner&#8221; to restate its case. In some cases, there are legitimate  performance and cost issues that require reconsideration. However, the  precedent established by CSAR-X suggests that the future award of major  defense contracts will only be a prelude to continued wrangling,  lobbying and rebidding.<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line for the acquisition  process is delivering the best hardware and services to our military, at  a fair price. Unfortunately, we are approaching a day when the  &#8220;politics&#8221; of the process trump everything else, resulting in  significantly longer lead times and potentially higher prices for  critical defense systems.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Airbus\/Northrup-Grumman KC-30 [and] Boeing&#8217;s KC-767. One of these aircraft will win the Air Force KC-X competition, and a contract to build the service&#8217;s next-generation tanker aircraft. The Air Force will wait until the end of the year to announce the winner of a $40-billion tanker contract, extending talks with bidders beyond the original, October [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":110211,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110210"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110210\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/110211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}