{"id":110084,"date":"2017-12-02T19:17:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T19:17:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:57:38","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:57:38","slug":"the-ultimate-sensor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/02\/the-ultimate-sensor\/","title":{"rendered":"The Ultimate Sensor"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.airforcetimes.com\/news\/2007\/05\/airforce_deptula_070525w\/\">This item<\/a>,  from last Friday&#8217;s on-line edition of Air Force Times, certainly caught  my attention, because it highlights one of the key issues facing our  military. Six years into the Global War on Terror, should the Pentagon  continue its emphasis on gold-plated weapons systems, or begin migrating  toward tools that might be more useful in the fight, namely advanced  sensors.<\/p>\n<p>In a speech last week at Offut AFB in Omaha, Air Force  Lieutenant General Dave Deptula came down squarely in the sensors  camped. Speaking to the annual ISR Symposium sponsored by Offut&#8217;s 55th  Wing (which operates the Air Force RC-135 fleet), General Deptula  described an evolving enemy, and the challenges associated with that  threat:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">\u201cThe enemy is evolving and  adapting, and is highly malleable, like a liquid that gravitates toward  our weakest points and defies our efforts to hold it in our grasp.  Infesting urban areas and hiding among the civilian population, just  finding the enemy has become our greatest challenge.\u201d <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">[snip]<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">Deptula  said the Cold War left the U.S. with a \u201cshooter-heavy footprint,\u201d that  is no longer applicable to today\u2019s fight. What\u2019s needed now, he said, is  an investment that makes ISR platforms and programs the centerpiece of  the \u201cglobal war on terror.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">\u201cToday\u2019s  enemy is not massing on the other side of the Fulda Gap,\u201d he said. \u201cOne  of their primary goals is to deny us a target and negate our firepower  advantage, so ISR now makes up the majority of our current operations.\u201d <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/>General  Deptula currently serves as the Air Force&#8217;s Deputy Chief of Staff for  Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR), so he definitely  has a dog in the fight. A massive investment in advanced sensors would  clearly benefit the service&#8217;s ISR community, which is pressing&#8211;with the  Air Force&#8217;s blessing&#8211;for control of all medium and high-altitude UAVs  in the DoD arsenal. Since many of these sensors would be mounted on  those same UAVs (or Air Force controlled satellites), the proposed  &#8220;sensor revolution&#8221; would give the service a tremendous leg up in  control of ISR systems&#8211;and the intelligence information they provide.<\/p>\n<p>But  Deptula&#8217;s remarks are also telling because the general is not a career  intelligence officer. He spend most of his career flying F-15s and first  gained fame as director of the &#8220;Black Hole&#8221; targeting cell in Saudi  Arabia during Operation Desert Storm. In that position, Deputla played a  major role in developing the air campaign that routed Saddam Hussein&#8217;s  forces. It was the ultimate application of shooter-heavy systems on the  battlefield, an era that, according to General Deptula, has now passed.<\/p>\n<p>However,  it should come as no surprise that Lieutenant General Deptula does  manage to find room for one advanced &#8220;shooter&#8221; his proposed quiver of  sensors and ISR systems. He said the F-22 Raptor and other  fifth-generation fighters &#8220;are still needed&#8221; because their capabilities  run the gamut of Air Force ISR, precision strike and electronic warfare  missions. He also suggested the need to discard the idea that such  aircraft are merely air-to-air combat platforms (yes, those words came  out of the mouth of an F-15 pilot). \u201cIt\u2019s not just an F,\u201d he said. \u201cIt\u2019s  also an F\/A, an EA, an AC, RC and a G.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>General Deptula also  said that the service needs to capitalize on the ISR investment that&#8217;s  already been made. He noted that &#8220;non-traditional&#8221; ISR assets like  targeting pods are not being sufficiently exploited, denying potential  information to the warfighter. He added that the top priority should be  to &#8220;eliminate&#8221; ISR as a low-density, high-demand asset, fielding  adequate numbers of sensors, platforms, support systems and personnel to  meet operational requirements.<\/p>\n<p>As a former member of the Air  Force ISR community, there&#8217;s a natural tendency to jump up and offer an  &#8220;Amen&#8221; to those comments. If ISR is the centerpiece of modern  warfighting, then we need to make the necessary investment to ensure the  availability of those systems. Of course, fitting them into the  acquisition budget (and after that, the POM) are a completely different  matter. The Air Force has a lot of big-ticket items in the pipeline and  while sensors aren&#8217;t as expensive as, say, a new manned bomber, they  aren&#8217;t cheap, either. Factor in the additional budgetary pressures from  the War on Terror, and the fiscal picture becomes even more bleak: those  new sensors should be a priority, but there&#8217;s no guarantee that the Air  Force will get everything it wants&#8211;or needs.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, the  pursuit of new sensor systems should come with a caveat: improvements in  airborne or overhead ISR should be matched with a corresponding  investment in the most important sensor of all, that pair of human eyes  connected to the Mark I brain. As we&#8217;ve learned in Iraq and Afghanistan,  there&#8217;s no substitute for timely, accurate human intelligence (HUMINT)  in fighting an insurgency. Indeed, many of our recent successes against  terrorists have been based on information provided by local residents,  through networks established (and cultivated) by intel officers on the  ground. As Ralph Peters noted a few months ago, there&#8217;s been something  of a revolution in HUMINT in Iraq, and we need to institutionalize that  success. Otherwise, the hard lessons gained in Fallujah, Al Anbar and  Sadr City will be forgotten, and we&#8217;ll be forced to relearn them again,  at a cost of more blood and treasure.<\/p>\n<p>General Deptula is right:  fighting wars in a post-modern world will require a focus on ISR and the  sensors that support it. But as the Air Force (and the other services)  plan for the &#8220;next&#8221; ISR revolution, they would be well advised to  incorporate the ground-based &#8220;human&#8221; sensor into their strategy.  Visiting an Air Force Distributed Common Ground Station (DCGS) Site,  you&#8217;ll find links to various platforms and sensors, scanning the  battlefield around the clock. In many respects, DCGS is the hub for the  ISR-centric warfare described by Lieutenant General Deptula. But the  mission crew at a DCGS site doesn&#8217;t include a HUMINT officer, with  experience in theater, and access to the local networks that provide  such vital information. The absence of that capability needs to be  corrected in order for DCGS (and Deptula&#8217;s ISR vision) to reach their  potential.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This item, from last Friday&#8217;s on-line edition of Air Force Times, certainly caught my attention, because it highlights one of the key issues facing our military. Six years into the Global War on Terror, should the Pentagon continue its emphasis on gold-plated weapons systems, or begin migrating toward tools that might be more useful in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110084"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110084"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110084\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110084"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110084"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110084"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}