{"id":110044,"date":"2017-12-04T13:15:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T13:15:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:57:22","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:57:22","slug":"it-time-to-change-some-laws","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/it-time-to-change-some-laws\/","title":{"rendered":"It&#39;s Time to Change Some Laws"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Yesterday, we faulted officials at Virginia Tech for failing to act on  the growing menace posed by Cho Seung-Hui. As reported in various media  accounts, Cho was accused of stalking female students in 2005, and  interviewed by campus police on at least three occasions. During that  same year, a Virginia judge declared him a public threat, and ordered  Cho confined to a mental hospital. More recently, Cho&#8217;s grotesque  writings and threatening demeanor so alarmed an English professor that  she demanded he be removed from her class.<\/p>\n<p>Despite those apparent  warning signs, administrators and public safety officials at Tech  proved unable to connect the dots; Mr. Cho remained in school and  eventually hatched the plan for Monday&#8217;s murderous rampage that killed  32 other students and faculty members, before he took his own life. In  many respects, Cho&#8217;s continued presence in Blacksburg was a failure of  leadership.<\/p>\n<p>In fairness, we did observe that suspending or  expelling Cho from the university would have been difficult. But we  didn&#8217;t realize just how complex that process was until reading an  informative article from Tamar Lewin in today&#8217;s edition of <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/04\/19\/us\/19protocol.html?hp\">The New York Times<\/a><\/em>.  Lewin&#8217;s reporting reveals a tangled web of anti-discrimination and  privacy laws that severely limit how universities can deal with mentally  ill students. In fact, existing regulations can place institutions of  higher learning in a legal double-bind:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">On  the one hand, they may be liable if they fail to prevent a suicide or  murder. After the death in 2000 of Elizabeth H. Shin, a student at the  Massachusetts Institute of Technology<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"> who had written several suicide notes and used the university  counseling service before setting herself on fire, the Massachusetts  Superior Court allowed her parents, who had not been told of her  deterioration, to sue administrators for $27.7 million. The case was  settled for an undisclosed amount. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><br \/>On  the other hand, universities may be held liable if they do take action  to remove a potentially suicidal student. In August, the City University  of New York<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"> agreed to pay $65,000 to a student who sued after being barred from her dormitory room at Hunter College<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"> because she was hospitalized after a suicide attempt.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">Also last year, George Washington University<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"> reached a confidential settlement in a case charging that it had  violated antidiscrimination laws by suspending Jordan Nott, a student  who had sought hospitalization for depression. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">And,  making matters worse, universities are prohibited from screening  students with potentially serious mental illnesses (that would violate  the Americans With Disabilities Act); releasing their medical records  (barred under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act),  and even disclosing medical conditions to family members without the  student&#8217;s permission (prohibited by a 1974 education rights and privacy  law).<\/p>\n<p>Such legal requirements, coupled with institutional  policies and the pervasive &#8220;tolerance&#8221; attitude on college campuses,  have created a procedural nightmare for university officials. That  doesn&#8217;t totally excuse the leadership failures at Virginia Tech; Cho&#8217;s  history of stalking, followed by the professor&#8217;s request to remove him  from class, should have triggered alarm bells within the English  Department and convened a wider inquiry into whether he posed a  legitimate safety threat. Instead, the department elected to muddle  through; Cho got a tutor and remained in school. Additionally, there&#8217;s  no evidence that administrators and campus police bothered to follow  through on complaints about Mr. Cho, despite their knowledge of his  troubled past.<\/p>\n<p>But the labyrinth depicted by the <em>Times <\/em>does  cast the situation in a slightly different light. Professors,  administrators and security officials still have an obligation to ensure  student safety, no matter how tough it may be. It&#8217;s regrettable that  various statutes (no matter how well-intentioned) have made that effort  even more difficult. In the aftermath of the Virginia Tech massacre, it  may be time to amend some of those laws.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, we faulted officials at Virginia Tech for failing to act on the growing menace posed by Cho Seung-Hui. As reported in various media accounts, Cho was accused of stalking female students in 2005, and interviewed by campus police on at least three occasions. During that same year, a Virginia judge declared him a public [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110044"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}