{"id":110024,"date":"2017-12-04T13:24:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T13:24:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:57:10","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:57:10","slug":"the-price-of-appeasement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/the-price-of-appeasement\/","title":{"rendered":"The Price of Appeasement"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf apparently isn&#8217;t a student of  history. Before embarking on his disastrous policy of appeasement with  Al Qaida and the Taliban in the western tribal lands, one would have  hoped that Mr. Musharaaf would have reviewed European history from the  past century, for past examples of trying to appease fanatics, and how  those acts ultimately led to a greater conflagration.<\/p>\n<p>We know  what happened when the British and the French tried to placate Hitler in  the 1930s. When his nascent German Army rolled into the Rhineland in  1936, the British and French ignored an opportunity to crush Hitler&#8217;s  legions, and registered only mild diplomatic protests. When the German  dictator demanded Czechoslovakia a few years later, London and Paris  willingly gave away a democratic state, all in hopes of appeasing a  growing menace. By the time Hitler&#8217;s panzers rolled into Poland in 1939,  it was too late. Over the next six years, millions died and vast  stretches of Europe, Africa and Asia were laid to waste, largely because  European politicians of the 1930s believed they could negotiate with a  madman.<\/p>\n<p>There are obvious&#8211;and eerie&#8211;parallels between the  situation in Europe 70 years ago, and events that are now transpiring in  Pakistan. <a href=\"http:\/\/billroggio.com\/archives\/2007\/03\/pakistans_civil_war.php\">Bill Roggio<\/a>,  who has covered the consequences of Musharraf&#8217;s appeasement policies  better than anyone, is now reporting that the situation along Pakistan&#8217;s  western border is growing steadily worse, despite a series of  &#8220;agreements&#8221; between the Islamabad government, and tribal factions that  are loyal or (or controlled) by the Taliban and Al Qaida.<\/p>\n<p>And,  predictably, the terrorists aren&#8217;t satisfied with merely dominating the  vast, rugged lands along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. The influence  of Al Qaida and Taliban elements is now spreading to some of Pakistan&#8217;s  urban centers, posing an even greater security challenge to the  Musharraf. In his latest post, Bill notes that the terrorists are openly  challenging the rule of law in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital. A  pro-Taliban militia is running a Saudi-style fundamentalist madrassa in  the heart of Islamabad, with a reputed enrollment of more than 7,000  students. Members of the group engage in &#8220;moral policing&#8221; around the  city, threatening shop owners who sell DVDs, CDs, or other western  offerings. Reaction from the government has been muted, at best.<\/p>\n<p>Mr.  Roggio describes this as a &#8220;civil war at the peripheries,&#8221; or (at the  very least), the wholesale surrender of territory by the Musharraf  government. In either case, the terrorists have been emboldened by the  recent Waziristan accords, which they view as a sign of weakness. Their  successful efforts at influencing events in Islamabad will likely  accelerate this trend. As Roggio notes, the Islamists are operating  without fear or impunity. The location of the Islamabad  madrassa&#8211;between the Prime Minister&#8217;s office and the headquarters of  Pakistan&#8217;s intelligence service (the ISI)&#8211;would have been almost  unthinkable a few years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Which brings us back to President  Musharaaf, and his &#8220;plans&#8221; for dealing with this threat. The &#8220;X&#8221; factor  is this equation isn&#8217;t the Pakistani public&#8211;or even the United  States&#8211;but rather, the senior officer corps of the nation&#8217;s military.  Musharaaf is, of course, a former general, the fourth who has served as  the nation&#8217;s leader during Pakistan&#8217;s turbulent history. Mr. Musharaaf  meets with the military&#8217;s senior leaders, or more specifically, the  Army&#8217;s ranking officers, on a regular basis. Bottom line: how much  longer will the military allow the unrest to continue before a corps or  field army commander decides that enough is enough, and it&#8217;s time for a  change.<\/p>\n<p>Under normal circumstances, the tipping point for  President Musharaaf might already be at hand. But Taliban penetration of  the ISI makes it more difficult to marshal supporters for a potential  coup; clearly terrorist sympathizers within the intelligence directorate  prefer the status quo, and the continuing slide toward chaos, followed  by a transition to fundamentalist rule. On the other hand, other  elements of the armed services (with a more western orientation) are  clearly concerned about the growing influence of the terrorists, but&#8211;so  far&#8211;seem unable or unwilling to do anything about it.<\/p>\n<p>Clearly,  any comparision between the Pakistan of today and Britain and France of  the 1930s is inexact, at best. The threat posed by a resugent Germany  was an external one; the dangers presented by the Taliban and Al Qaida  are internal to Pakistan. Yet, in many respects, the analogy remains  valid. Like Neville Chamberlain, Mr. Musharraf seems to believe that he  can negotiate his way to security, despite the savage and completely  disreputable nature of his foes. And, the lethargy of Pakistan&#8217;s  military seems oddly reminiscent of the French Army of the the pre-war  era; institutions that appear impressive on paper (and in parades), but  in reality, are little more than paper tigers, unable to meet emerging  threats.<\/p>\n<p>From the U.S. perspective, the deteriorating situation  in Pakistan should be viewed with great alarm. The Bush Administration  still viewed Musharaaf as an &#8220;important&#8221; ally in the War on Terror, even  as his government brokered deals with terrorists in the tribal lands.  Never mind that those agreements created new safe havens for the Taliban  and Al Qaida to launch attacks into Afghanistan; Musharaaf got the  benefit of the doubt, largely because of his past stand against the  terrorists.<\/p>\n<p>Given the current situation in Pakistan, Washington  would be well-advised to keep its options open. Musharraf&#8217;s survival is  hardly assured, and I&#8217;m hoping that the folks at DIA, CIA and the  National Security Council have been keeping track of potential  successors. Obviously, we&#8217;d prefer someone from the &#8220;western&#8221; wing of  the military, capable of restoring security in Islamabad and other key  cities, then (eventually) resuming the fight against terrorists in the  tribal lands. The question, of course, is whether Pakistan&#8217;s general  staff can find someone willing to take on this menace, or if Musharraf&#8217;s  appeasement policies have left the military divided and distracted.<\/p>\n<p>For  the sake of Pakistan&#8217;s future&#8211;and stability on the Asian subcontinent,  we&#8217;d better hope that the answer to that question lies in the former  option, and not the latter. The real prize for control of the country  lies in the heavily-guarded caves and bunkers of the Pakistani  mountains, where the nation&#8217;s nuclear weapons are stored. Imagine an Al  Qaida\/Taliban regime with nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, and  you&#8217;ve got some idea of the nightmare that could emerge in Pakistan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf apparently isn&#8217;t a student of history. Before embarking on his disastrous policy of appeasement with Al Qaida and the Taliban in the western tribal lands, one would have hoped that Mr. Musharaaf would have reviewed European history from the past century, for past examples of trying to appease fanatics, and how [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110024"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110024\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}