{"id":109994,"date":"2017-12-04T13:38:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T13:38:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:56:59","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:56:59","slug":"predator-down","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/predator-down\/","title":{"rendered":"Predator Down"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Here&#8217;s another headline from Air Force Times, which (at first glance) appears troubling:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.airforcetimes.com\/news\/2007\/02\/AFpredatorlosses070223\/\">Half of Predators fielded have been lost<\/a>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In  recent testimony before Congress, the Air Force Chief of Staff, General  T. Michael Moseley, reported that the service has lost &#8220;48 or 49&#8221; of  the 90 Predator drones it has received. Even those with an aversion to  math&#8211;your humble correspondent included&#8211;can figure out that the  cumulative loss rate is better than 50%, far higher than any other  airframe in the DoD inventory.<\/p>\n<p>So the Predator program is a  disaster, right? Each of these unmanned aerial vehicles cost roughly $1  million each. Add on the sensor package&#8211;which is also lost when a  Predator goes down&#8211;and the price doubles. So, these UAV losses have  cost the U.S. taxpayer almost $100 million in destroyed airframes and  sensors.<\/p>\n<p>But some elements are missing from the <em>Times<\/em>  report. First, the paper neglects to mention that the Predator has been  in operation for more than a decade. Divide the cumulative losses by the  number of years in service, and the &#8220;average&#8221; number of Predator losses  is about five a year.<\/p>\n<p>Then, factor in the platform&#8217;s combat service during that period. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalsecurity.org\/intell\/systems\/predator.htm\">According to limited data from GlobalSecurity.org,<\/a> at least four Predators were lost in Kosovo, and nine more crashed in  the first year after 9-11. In other words, about 25% of the UAVs were  lost in combat operations, in a relatively short span, encompassing the  88-day campaign of Operation Allied Force (1999), and first year of  Enduring Freedom, which also coincided with the run-up to the invasion  of Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>In support of combat operations in the Middle East, the number of flight hours logged by Predator is &#8220;off the charts.&#8221; In 2005, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalsecurity.org\/intell\/library\/news\/2005\/intell-050913-afpn01.htm\">a  single Predator squadron, then based at Nellis AFB, NV, logged an  amazing 27,000 flying hours, far more than any other Air Force flying  unit<\/a>. The Air Force has at least three operational Predator  squadrons; all are busy in support of training and contingency missions  around the world, and they log a lot of flying hours. As we&#8217;ve noted  before, loss rates are typically calculated per 100,000 flying hours;  using that barometer, the number of Predators lost is still above manned  aircraft, but more &#8220;acceptable&#8221; in terms of hours flown, and the  conditions that UAVs typically operate under.<\/p>\n<p>As one Predator  squadron commander observered, the platform&#8217;s biggest problem is its  popularity. Demand for UAV support from combat units&#8211;particularly  ground forces&#8211;has increased geometrically over the past five years.  That means more missions, more flying hours, and a greater strain on  operators and maintenance personnel to keep Predators in the air. That  strain is further compounded by weather and altitude  conditions&#8211;particularly in Afghanistan, and the fact that the enemy  fires on our UAVs, and he gets lucky from time-to-time. We&#8217;ve also lost  Predators due to operational and mechanical problems, ranging from pilot  error (flying an aircraft by remote control, from thousands of miles  away is more difficult than you might think), to system failures&#8211;the  same issues associated with manned aircraft.<\/p>\n<p>Even in an era of  $600 billion defense budgets, $100 million in lost UAVs is a major chunk  of change. So, the Air Force carefully analyzes each Predator crash,  learns from it, and incorporates those lessons into future operations.  More importantly, a more detailed analysis of Predator&#8217;s history reveals  that the service, its &#8220;operational&#8221; customers and the taxpayer&#8211;have  received a good deal of bang for their buck. By pushing the limits of  system performance and operations, the Air Force has delivered a  genuine, persistent ISR (intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance)  capability for troops on the ground, resulting in the discovery of  countless IEDs, weapons caches, terrorist movements and other details  that would have otherwise gone unnoticed. That, in turn, has saved the  lives of countless troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. And it&#8217;s hard to put a  price tag on that type of &#8220;savings.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>Like the blind hog finding the proverbial acorn, the <em>Times<\/em> does somehow manage to highlight an important element of the UAV debate  in its coverage. As General Moseley reminded that Congressional  committee, the skies over Iraq and Afghanistan are increasingly crowded  with UAVs, operated by all the services. He is correct in advocating  that all drones above 3700 feet be controlled by a single manager&#8211;the  USAF. The Big Sky\/Little Aircraft theory goes only so far, even in the  (relatively) wide open spaces of the Middle East.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here&#8217;s another headline from Air Force Times, which (at first glance) appears troubling: &#8220;Half of Predators fielded have been lost.&#8221; In recent testimony before Congress, the Air Force Chief of Staff, General T. Michael Moseley, reported that the service has lost &#8220;48 or 49&#8221; of the 90 Predator drones it has received. Even those with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109994"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}