{"id":109925,"date":"2017-12-04T15:43:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T15:43:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:56:22","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:56:22","slug":"what-you-didn-hear-at-gates","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/what-you-didn-hear-at-gates\/","title":{"rendered":"What You Didn&#39;t Hear at the Gates Confirmation Hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>A tip of the hat to John Hinderaker at <a href=\"http:\/\/powerlineblog.com\/archives\/016122.php\">Powerline<\/a>,  who notes a glaring omission during yesterday&#8217;s confirmation love-fest  between Defense Secretary nominee Robert Gates, and members of the  Senate Armed Services Committee. As part of the confirmation process,  Mr. Gates provided written responses to questions on a wide range of  military-related issues, including the Iran&#8217;s geopolitical intentions,  and the growing military threat posed by China. Unfortunately, Mr.  Gates&#8217; answers generated no follow-up questions during his appearance on  Tuesday, making one wonder if anyone on the committee&#8211;senators or  staffers&#8211;actually bothered to read the questionnaire.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/12\/05\/AR2006120501239_2.html\">Dana Milbank&#8217;s account of the hearing <\/a>(in today&#8217;s <em>Washington Post)<\/em> suggests a committee that was largely going through the motions. When  Mr. Gates told Michigan&#8217;s Carl Levin that the U.S. is not &#8220;winning&#8221; in  Iraq,&#8221; and that he is &#8220;open to all options,&#8221; well, that was all the  committee needed to hear. Smiles all around, and a ringing endorsement  from the senators, who, in Milbank&#8217;s words, viewed Gates as &#8220;a prophet  [who] came forth to deliver us from the war in Babylon.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Fortunately,  there are a few analysts who have bothered to read Mr. Gates response  to the questionnaire, and they find his answers troubling, in several  respects. On the issue of Iran, Gates was asked about his recommendation  to &#8220;negotiate&#8221; with Tehran (in an effort to help stabilize Iraq) and  how to deal with other areas of concern, namely the Iranian nuclear  program. Thomas Joscelyn of The Claremont Institute finds <a href=\"http:\/\/www.claremont.org\/weblog\/005404.html\">Gates&#8217; response to be only &#8220;marginally better&#8221; than his previous writings on the topic.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>On  a related note, there was an exchange during the hearing that  Claremont&#8217;s Seth Leibsohn finds absolutely astounding. Gates was asked  by South Carolina&#8217;s Lindsey Graham whether Iran would actually use  nuclear weapons against Israel. His reply? &#8220;I don&#8217;t know if they would  do that, Senator.&#8221; When Graham reminded Mr. Gates of comments from  Iran&#8217;s president that Israel should be &#8220;wiped off the map,&#8221; the nominee  opined that &#8220;there are higher powers in Iran&#8221; who might view nuclear  weapons are more of a deterrent.<\/p>\n<p>Mr. Liebsohn believes that Gates  is underestimating Iranian rhetoric and intent, and I tend to agree.  However, Gates&#8217; views are consistent with his cohorts on the Iraq Study  Group, who are pressing for &#8220;engagement&#8221; with Tehran, to help facilitate  our exit from Iraq.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll be taking an expanded look at Mr.  Gates&#8217; questionnaire response in a future post. Given the pressing  challenges facing our military (in Iraq and elsewhere), his answers  deserve more than the cursory look afforded by the Senate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A tip of the hat to John Hinderaker at Powerline, who notes a glaring omission during yesterday&#8217;s confirmation love-fest between Defense Secretary nominee Robert Gates, and members of the Senate Armed Services Committee. As part of the confirmation process, Mr. Gates provided written responses to questions on a wide range of military-related issues, including the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109925"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}