{"id":109904,"date":"2017-12-04T15:52:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T15:52:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:56:11","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:56:11","slug":"ike-skelton-knows-better-or-at-least-he","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/ike-skelton-knows-better-or-at-least-he\/","title":{"rendered":"Ike Skelton Knows Better (Or, At Least He Should)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>In recent years, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.house.gov\/skelton\/about.html\">Democratic Congressman Ike Skelton of Missouri <\/a>has  been something of a rarity in his party&#8211;a voice of moderation and  sanity on defense issues. Over the course of a 30-year career in the  House, Mr. Skelton has been a consistent champion of the armed services  (and those who serve) supporting the weapons modernization programs,  along with pay and benefit increases for those who wear the uniform.<\/p>\n<p>But,  apparently, even Congressman Skelton knows when to toe the party line.  Appearing on Lou Dobbs&#8217; CNN program last night, Skelton paid deference  to the incoming chair of the House Ways and Means Committee (Charlie  Rangel of New York), and his warped ideas about those who serve in the  U.S. military and make the sacrifices that come with service. While  acknowledging that the all-volunteer military has been a tremendous  success, Skelton quickly echoed Rangel&#8217;s talking points about who  serves&#8211;and who may be called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">The  downside, of course, is &#8212; and I recently ran the statistics &#8212; the  downside on this, as most of the deaths that have occurred in Iraq are  young people that come from small-town America or from the inner city.  Charlie Rangel should be credited with pointing out the fact that people  in the military do not represent a broad spectrum of America.&#8221;<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">What  rubbish. First of all, Congressmen Skelton didn&#8217;t offer any of the  &#8220;numbers&#8221; he recently ran, so the validity of his casualty analysis is  suspect, at best. Moreover, his assertion that the military does not  represent a broad spectrum of America is a downright lie, as evidenced  by the often-cited, 2005 study by the Heritage Foundation. Studying  demographic data of U.S. military recruits over a three-year period  (2003-2005), Dr. Tim Kane found that today&#8217;s enlistees are a reflection  of society at large. Among the key findings from his study:<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\"><\/span><\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\">In  summary, the additional years of recruit data (2004\u00c2\u20132005) sup\u00adport the  previous finding that U.S. military recruits are more similar than  dissimilar to the American youth population. The slight dif\u00adferences are  that wartime U.S. mil\u00aditary enlistees are better educated, wealthier,  and more rural on aver\u00adage than their civilian peers.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-size: 85%;\"><br \/>Recruits  have a higher percent\u00adage of high school graduates and representation  from Southern and rural areas. No evidence indicates exploitation of  racial minorities (either by race or by race-weighted ZIP code areas).  Finally, the distri\u00adbution of household income of recruits is noticeably  higher than that of the entire youth population.<\/p>\n<p>Demographic  evidence discredits the argument that a draft is necessary to enforce  representation from racial and socioeconomic groups. Addition\u00adally,  three of the four branches of the armed forces met their recruiting  goals in fiscal year 2005, and Army reenlistments are the highest in the  past five years. A draft is not necessary to increase the size of the  active-duty forces. Our analysis using Pentagon data on wartime  volunteers effectively shatters the case for reinstating the draft.<br \/><\/span><span style=\"font-size: 100%;\">In  fact, Kane&#8217;s analysis found that poor neighborhoods are  underrepresented in today&#8217;s military, negating Skelton&#8217;s claims that the  sons and daughters of the needy are dying in disproportionatee numbers  in Iraq. Indeed, the only group that seems to bear a greater burden (in  terms of military service) are southerners, and in particular, those  from rural areas below the Mason-Dixon line. However, southerners have  long answered the call of the armed services (for a variety of reasons)  including the fact that a military career has long been viewed as a  honorable calling in that region. In other words, many recruits from the  south sign up because they choose to, not because they have to. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Congressman  Skelton ought to know better&#8211;and probably does&#8211;but there is clearly a  limit on how far he&#8217;ll go in bucking Charley Rangel. As the Ways and  Means chairman, Mr. Rangel will exert considerable power, influencing  issues that affect Mr. Skelton&#8217;s rural district. Calling Rangel an idiot  on national TV would be poor form (if not accurate), and have a  decidedly negative impact on programs that would benefit Skelton&#8217;s  Missouri constituents.  So, we can only hope that Skelton&#8217;s ill-advised  comments were nothing more than a sop to his fellow Democrat, and not a  reflection of his own views on the military. If a genuine Democratic  &#8220;defense expert&#8221; believes blatant lies about those who serve and bear  the brunt of combat casualties, then our Congress&#8211;and the military&#8211;are  in real trouble come January.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;d like to let Mr. Skelton know how wrong he is on these issues, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.house.gov\/skelton\/contact.html\">here is contact information <\/a>for his office in D.C., and his district office in Missouri.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In recent years, Democratic Congressman Ike Skelton of Missouri has been something of a rarity in his party&#8211;a voice of moderation and sanity on defense issues. Over the course of a 30-year career in the House, Mr. Skelton has been a consistent champion of the armed services (and those who serve) supporting the weapons modernization [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109904"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109904"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109904\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}