{"id":109897,"date":"2017-12-04T15:56:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T15:56:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:56:06","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:56:06","slug":"fallout-is-continuing-from-last-month","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/fallout-is-continuing-from-last-month\/","title":{"rendered":"Fallout is continuing from last month&#39;s successful shadowing of the USS Kitty Hawk by a Chinese Song-class"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><p>In Beijing, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newkerala.com\/news4.php?action=fullnews&amp;id=50853\">PRC Defense Ministry is refusing comment on the incident<\/a>, which occurred on 26 October. According to Bill Gertz of the <em>Washington Times<\/em>, the Chinese sub slipped undetected inside the U.S. carrier&#8217;s defensive screen, then surfaced only five miles from the <em>Kitty Hawk<\/em>,  which was operating near Okinawa at the time. China&#8217;s official silence  on the matter is probably an effort to spare further embarrassment to  Admiral Gary Roughead, Commander of the U.S. Pacific Fleet, who is  currently visiting the PRC on a long-planned visit.<\/p>\n<p>Over at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensetech.org\/\">DefenseTech.org<\/a>,  Noah Schactman was kind enough to link to some of our observations on  the incident. He also has an e-mail from a former commander of our sub  force in the Pacific, retired Rear Admiral Hank McKinney, who notes the  difficulty in detecting advanced diesel subs, particularly those fitted  with ultra-quiet AIP (Air Independent Propulsion) systems. Currently,  there is no hard evidence that the Song boat which trailed the Kitty  Hawk was outfitted with an AIP system. However, China has great interest  in this technology, which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.globalsecurity.org\/military\/world\/europe\/type-214.htm\">uses fuel cells (instead of a diesel engine) to recharge the submarine&#8217;s batteries, making an already quiet sub even stealthier<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The  Swedish Navy already has an AIP sub in service (HMS Gortland). For the  past year, that boat has been operating out of San Diego, providing  training for U.S. Navy ASW units. Initial reports suggest that the  Gortland is extremely hard to detect, and the Navy recently announced  that the training agreement would be extended by a year, to provide more  time for training against the AIP boat, and development of tactics for  dealing with that threat. Germany, Italy, Greece and Pakistan all have  AIP boats on order, and it would be relatively easy for the PRC to  obtain the technology, and incorporate it into new attack subs.<\/p>\n<p>Over  at DefenseTech, Admiral McKinney wonders if the Chinese might have  staged the incident to coincide with Admiral Roughead&#8217;s visit. That&#8217;s  possible, but that theory is predicated on a couple of long shots: (a)  that the sub would successfully complete its mission, and (b) word of  the episode would be leaked&#8211;by the U.S. Navy&#8211;while Admiral Roughead  was visiting China.<\/p>\n<p>Bill Gertz, who originally broke the story,  based his reporting on information from unnamed &#8220;defense officials,&#8221;  indicating that the leak came from within the Pentagon. My guess is that  the story was planted by one of Admiral Roughead&#8217;s rivals within the  upper ranks of the Navy. As Commander of the Pacific Fleet, Roughead  holds down one of the plum jobs in the U.S. Navy; his selection for that  post means that other officers were passed over, and one of them might  have viewed the sub incident as a chance to exact a little revenge.  Another source for the leak is a disgruntled former staffer, who served  under Roughead in a previous assignment. You don&#8217;t reach four-star  status without making a few enemies, or leaving a few disappointed  subordinates in your wake.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s also the possibility that  Gertz obtained his information from a senior officer or official in  another branch of the armed services, anxious to illustrate the  &#8220;vulnerability&#8221; of carrier groups, and the potential folly of funding  more capital ships that can be sunk by a single, relatively cheap diesel  sub. Rule #1 in the DoD budget wars: you can get more money for your  stuff by making the other guy&#8217;s system look vulnerable.<\/p>\n<p>I think Admiral McKinney is right. The timing of this story <em>was<\/em> intended to embarrass Admiral Roughead during his visit to China. But  the leak has all the trademarks of an &#8220;inside job,&#8221; originating within  the senior ranks of the Navy, the joint staff, or a rival service.  Regrettably, such leaks are part and parcel of how business gets done in  the Pentagon. That Chinese sub simply provided the event; Roughead&#8217;s  &#8220;rivals&#8221; (for lack of a better term) did the rest, in the pages of the <em>Washington Times<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>In the wake of the sub story, the Navy has released this photo of the <em>USS Asheville<\/em>, a <em>Los Angeles-<\/em>class attack sub, steaming ahead of the <em>Kitty Hawk<\/em> during joint exercises with Japanese defense forces. It would be interesting to know if the Asheville was attached to the <em>Kitty Hawk<\/em> battle group when it was surprised by the PRC sub. As we&#8217;ve noted  before, one of the jobs of an LA-class boat is to keep enemy subs away  from the carrier. If the the Asheville was part of group at the time of  the incident, then the sub&#8217;s skipper may be on his last cruise, although  there&#8217;s plenty of blame to go around.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/blogger\/2242\/853\/1600\/USSAshville.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/photos1.blogger.com\/blogger\/2242\/853\/320\/USSAshville.jpg\" style=\"cursor: hand;\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Beijing, the PRC Defense Ministry is refusing comment on the incident, which occurred on 26 October. According to Bill Gertz of the Washington Times, the Chinese sub slipped undetected inside the U.S. carrier&#8217;s defensive screen, then surfaced only five miles from the Kitty Hawk, which was operating near Okinawa at the time. China&#8217;s official [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109897"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109897\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}