{"id":109892,"date":"2017-12-04T15:58:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T15:58:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:56:06","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:56:06","slug":"an-empty-ship-long-way-from-home","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/an-empty-ship-long-way-from-home\/","title":{"rendered":"An Empty Ship, a Long Way From Home"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>Thanks to alert reader Jack D., who found this interesting item in today&#8217;s <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/11\/09\/AR2006110900124.html\">Washington Post<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The  Indian Navy has detained a North Korean-flagged cargo vessel that  entered its waters after &#8220;developing a snag&#8221; late last month. Indian  officials have stated that the DPRK crew has not been able to explain  why the ship&#8211;the MV Omrani II&#8211;was sailing between North Korea and Iran  without any cargo. The crew&#8217;s original explanation, that they were  testing a new ship, apparently won&#8217;t suffice for Indian investigators.  As one official noted, with a touch of irony, that it is &#8220;strange&#8221; the  North Korean crew would sail as far as Iran on a &#8220;shakedown&#8221; cruise. At  last report, the DPRK vessel was still in the Indian port of Mumbai;  there was no indication as to when it might be allowed to proceed.<\/p>\n<p>There is some speculation that the North Korean ship and its crew could be involved in drug smuggling. As detailed in this 2003 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.heritage.org\/Research\/AsiaandthePacific\/bg1679.cfm\">Heritage Foundation study<\/a>,  Pyongyang has a long history of trafficking in illegal narcotics, as a  way of supplementing its moribund economy. North Korea has used cargo  vessels for drug smuggling in the past, so there&#8217;s a real possibility  that the MV Omrani II was heading for a pick-up, or had transferred its  cargo to another vessel. If that was the case, then the Iranian  &#8220;destination&#8221; was probably just a ruse, although corrupt Iranian  officials frequently let drugs pass through their ports and borders, in  exchange for a cut of the profits.<\/p>\n<p>Another possibility is that  the ship was involved in some sort of illegal arms or technology  transfer. In the wake of Pyongyang&#8217;s recent missile and nuclear tests,  there&#8217;s been increased scrutiny of DPRK cargo vessels, in hopes of  preventing the transfer of missile and\/or WMD technology over the high  seas.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wisconsinproject.org\/countries\/nkorea\/north-korea-miles.html\">And there&#8217;s plenty of reason to be suspicious<\/a>.  In 1999, the Indian Navy stopped another NK cargo vessel, the  &#8220;Kuwolsan,&#8221; carrying what inspectors described as &#8220;an entire assembly  line&#8221; for SCUD missiles. The hardware (falsely listed on the ship&#8217;s  manifest as water refining equipment) was apparently bound for Libya.  Three years later, Spanish ships (working with U.S. authorities)  detained a second North Korean freighter, also carrying missile cargo.  The vessel was allowed to continue on its journey when it was learned  that the cargo was heading for Yemen, and not Iran.<\/p>\n<p>However, the  DPRK vessel involved in the latest controversy is said to be relatively  small (45 meters in length), limiting the amount of cargo that could be  carried, and the size of individual components. But the MV Omrani II is  probably big enough to carry most types of missile hardware, including  fuel tanks, engines, and even smaller airframe sections. Of course, that  begs the question of where the missile cargo might be, given the fact  that the DPRK vessel was empty at the time it was boarded and diverted  to India. My guess&#8211;and it&#8217;s only a hunch&#8211;is that the MV Ormani II was  enroute to pick-up defective missile components from an Iranian port,  and return them to NK for repair or replacement.<\/p>\n<p>But if the  Ormani was on its way to pick-up sensitive and\/or high value cargo, why  not dispatch one of North Korea&#8217;s Russian-built IL-76 transports,  similar in size and capacity to the U.S. C-141. The fact that an IL-76  wasn&#8217;t used suggests (a) the cargo was too large for the aircraft; (b)  the destination was beyond the unrefuled range of the &#8220;Candid,&#8221; or (c)  the U.S. has been successful in demanding the examination of North  Korean owned and chartered transport aircraft. In other words, the cargo  may have been so sensitive that Pyongyang couldn&#8217;t afford a third-party  inspection if the aircraft had to refuel on return to the DPRK.<\/p>\n<p>Judging  from the reaction of Indian authorities&#8211;and the vessel&#8217;s continuing  detention in Mumbai&#8211;it looks like the mystery of the MV Omrani II is  far from resolved. Whatever its mission was&#8211;or might be&#8211;one thing is  clear: the NK freighter wasn&#8217;t on a simple &#8220;shakedown&#8221; trip to Iran.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/http\/\/eaglespeak.blogspot.com\/\">Eaglespeak<\/a> is also following this story. His blog is the definitive source for  information relating to port security, piracy and other maritime topics.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thanks to alert reader Jack D., who found this interesting item in today&#8217;s Washington Post. The Indian Navy has detained a North Korean-flagged cargo vessel that entered its waters after &#8220;developing a snag&#8221; late last month. Indian officials have stated that the DPRK crew has not been able to explain why the ship&#8211;the MV Omrani [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109892"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109892"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109892\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109892"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109892"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109892"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}