{"id":109852,"date":"2017-12-04T16:25:00","date_gmt":"2017-12-04T16:25:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2023-01-08T10:55:46","modified_gmt":"2023-01-08T10:55:46","slug":"mary-mapes-have-we-got-job-for-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/2017\/12\/04\/mary-mapes-have-we-got-job-for-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Mary Mapes: Have We Got a Job for You"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;\" class=\"sharethis-inline-share-buttons\" ><\/div><h3 class=\"post-title entry-title\" itemprop=\"name\"><\/h3>\n<div class=\"post-header\"> <\/div>\n<p>In the event her new producing gig at HDNet TV doesn&#8217;t work out, we&#8217;ve  found another potential job for Mary Mapes, the disgraced ex-CBS news  staffer who was the driving force behind the &#8220;docu-gate&#8221; scandal.<\/p>\n<p>From  what we can tell, the &#8220;official&#8221; Iranian news agency (FARS) could use a  little editorial help. Journalistic accuracy and objectivity are  apparently not required, and the bashing of America (and President Bush)  are highly encouraged. True, Ms. Mapes would have to relocated to  Tehran&#8211;and make some major wardrobe adjustments&#8211;but I&#8217;m sure FARS  would welcome someone of her stature. Heck, they might even offer a job  to Dan Rather, if he could learn to say &#8220;courage&#8221; in Farsi.<\/p>\n<p>Finding  accuracy in a FARS news report is about as difficult as locating a  viable Democratic plan for national security. But FARS is hardly  deterred; they&#8217;re more than willing to print (or post) almost anything,  in support of Iran&#8217;s glorious theocracy. Apparently, their greatest  weakness is a tendency to publish almost any sort of picture to  illustrate their &#8220;news coverage.&#8221; Consider this recent headline, and the  accompanying photo:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Iranian F14s Carry Hawk Missiles Successfully&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Now, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.farsnews.com\/English\/newstext.php?nn=8506130205\">take a look at an image of those missiles <\/a>(sorry  for using a link; Blogger&#8217;s photo upload feature isn&#8217;t working at the  moment). It doesn&#8217;t take a military expert to realize that the FARS  picture is actually a shot of a Russian space launch vehicle, a bit too  large to be carried by an F-14 (or any other fighter). But that  inconvenient fact doesn&#8217;t bother the editors at FARS; they seem to have  the best &#8220;transcription&#8221; service this side of <em>The New York Times, <\/em>faithfully publishing anything their political bosses wish to see in print.<\/p>\n<p>A  little sidenote about this HAWK experiment. An I-HAWK is actually a  medium range, surface-to-air missile. Iran bought a large number of  I-HAWKS from the U.S. during the days of the Shah, the same era when  they purchased the F-14. Thirty years later, the F-14s are on their last  legs; only a handful are flyable, and their long-range AIM-54 PHOENIX  air-to-air missiles reached the end of their service life about a decade  ago. So, what can Iran do to restore a semblance of the F-14&#8217;s  long-range missile capability? Try hanging a pair of I-HAWKs on the jet.  Turns out that the missile will work with the Tomcat&#8217;s AWG-9 radar  system, and (in an air-to-air mode) the HAWK might be capable of hitting  targets 30 miles away (by comparison, the AIM-54 had a maximum range of  100 NM).<\/p>\n<p>But there are some significant problems with this  little science project, too. First of all, the HAWK is so large that you  can only mount two on the jet, staggered on the belly of the Tomcat.  Then, there&#8217;s the HAWK&#8217;s nasty habit of igniting as soon as you press  the trigger button (necessary for getting large surface-to-air missile  into the air). Firing from a rugged ground launcher, that&#8217;s no problem,  but from an aircraft, that&#8217;s a disaster waiting to happen. In fact, I&#8217;m  told that Iran tried this experiment a few years ago and gave up because  the HAWK&#8217;s motor fired as soon as the F-14 crew pressed the &#8220;pickle&#8221;  button. The missile&#8217;s large exhaust plume caught the jet on fire,  causing it to crash. For the HAWK t have any hope of success in an  air-to-air role, the Iranians would have to install some sort of  ejection system (to push the missile away from the aircraft), and a  delay mechanism, to prevent the rocket motor from firing too soon.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom  line: attempting to hang an I-HAWK on an F-14 as an air-to-air missile  is a sign of desparation, not a show of military strength. The real  question is how many additional F-14s Iran will destroy in this latest  version of their experiment.<\/p>\n<p>But back to FARS. Take a look at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.farsnews.com\/English\/newstext.php?nn=8506130203\">another story<\/a>,  touting the &#8220;complicated dogfight tactics&#8221; used in recent Air Force  wargames. Notice anything odd about the accompanying photo? Well, for  starters, the planes in the picture are U.S. Air Force F-22s; and, since  the Iranian news agency makes no effort to identify them as &#8220;enemy&#8221;  aircraft, the casual reader is left with the impression that Tehran&#8217;s  fighter aircraft are state-of-the art. Memo to FARS: next time you run a  picture of a U.S. fighter, you might want to use &#8220;Photoshop&#8221; and  eliminate those annoying little give-aways, like the USAF star on the  wing.<\/p>\n<p>Want more? Here&#8217;s a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.farsnews.com\/English\/newstext.php?nn=8506150279\">FARS report on Iran&#8217;s efforts to develop and test a 2,000-pound, laser-guided bomb<\/a>.  However, the &#8220;test aircraft&#8221; in the photo is actually a U.S. Air Force  F-15E Strike Eagle, dropping what appears to be Paveway series LGB. The  &#8220;LN&#8221; on the tail identifies the jet as part of the 48th Fighter Wing,  based at RAF Lakenheath in the United Kingdom. Needless to say, Iran  doesn&#8217;t have any Strike Eagles&#8211;let alone any with USAF markings&#8211;and  they don&#8217;t have any advanced LGBs.<\/p>\n<p>But even the crack photo team  at FARS managed to top that one. In a recent story on the start of air  service to Lahore, the aircraft depicted was a NATO AWACS, its large  radardome clearly visible in the photograph.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s easy to laugh  at these &#8220;mistakes,&#8221; but there&#8217;s a method behind FARS&#8217; journalistic  madness. Coverage of recent &#8220;military developments&#8221; is aimed at creating  an image of a resurgent, powerful, Iran, equipped with the latest in  military weaponry. The editors at FARS are quite aware that most of its  readers have little knowledge of military weaponry, and are inclined to  accept its &#8220;coverage&#8221; as the gospel truth. The same holds true for  western press organizations. I haven&#8217;t seen Reuters or the AP use one of  Iran&#8217;s re-cycled U.S. military photos (yet), but there has been plenty  of coverage of recent Iranian exercises, dutifully reporting the testing  of &#8220;new&#8221; Iranian&#8221; missiles and torpedoes. Never mind that at least one  of the recent missile tests has never been confirmed, and that high  speed torpedo is marginally effective against maneuvering targets, or  vessels with counter-measures systems. When it comes to Iranian military  power, the western media is also a transcription service, only to a  lesser degree.<\/p>\n<p>I think Ms. Mapes would be a welcome addition to  the FARS staff. One wonders why Al Jazerra didn&#8217;t sign her up for their  fledgling English-language service.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the event her new producing gig at HDNet TV doesn&#8217;t work out, we&#8217;ve found another potential job for Mary Mapes, the disgraced ex-CBS news staffer who was the driving force behind the &#8220;docu-gate&#8221; scandal. From what we can tell, the &#8220;official&#8221; Iranian news agency (FARS) could use a little editorial help. Journalistic accuracy and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109852"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=109852"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/109852\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=109852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cvnextjob.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=109852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}